Daihatsu YRV MOT Results

Registered in 2004
46.1% pass rate
from 154 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 cars and highlighted areas where the Daihatsu YRV is unusually good or bad.

  • 28% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 11% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 9.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 9.1% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.65% fail on Rear lamps
    • 8.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 6.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.2% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 2.6% fail on Fog lamp
    • 2.6% fail on Horn (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Battery
    • 0.65% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.65% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.65% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.65% fail on All direction indicators
  • 23% fail on Suspension
    • 16% fail on Prescribed areas (10 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 14% fail on Component mounting (11 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Subframe mounting (9 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Spring mounting
    • 2.6% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 2.6% fail on Rear
    • 2.6% fail on Drive shafts
      • 2.6% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 2.6% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 1.3% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.65% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.65% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.65% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.65% fail on Condition
    • 0.65% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
    • 0.65% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.65% fail on Condition
  • 19% fail on Brakes
    • 9.7% fail on Brake performance
      • 7.8% fail on Front wheels (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.3% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 8.4% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 6.5% fail on Components
        • 5.8% fail on Pipes
        • 0.65% fail on Cylinders
      • 1.9% fail on Operation (22 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.65% fail on Leaks
    • 3.2% fail on Hub components
      • 1.9% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.3% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.3% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
    • 1.3% fail on ABS
    • 0.65% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.65% fail on Pedal
        • 0.65% fail on Condition
    • 0.65% fail on Restricted movement
  • 14% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (120% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 9.7% fail on Exhaust system (150% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Emissions
    • 2.6% fail on Emissions not tested (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.65% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.65% fail on Pipe
  • 9.1% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 7.8% fail on Wipers
    • 0.65% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.65% fail on Washers
  • 7.1% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (140% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 7.1% fail on Seat belts (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 5.8% fail on Prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Requirements
      • 0.65% fail on Condition
  • 5.2% fail on Tyres
    • 2.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.9% fail on Condition
    • 0.65% fail on Size/type
    • 0.65% fail on Valve stem
  • 4.5% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 2.6% fail on Body condition (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.3% fail on Chassis
    • 0.65% fail on Seats
      • 0.65% fail on Drivers
    • 0.65% fail on Load security
      • 0.65% fail on Tailgate
  • 2.6% fail on Steering
    • 1.9% fail on Steering system
      • 1.3% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.65% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.65% fail on Power steering
      • 0.65% fail on Drive system
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages