Daihatsu YRV MOT Results

Registered in 2004
47.7% pass rate
from 107 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 cars and highlighted areas where the Daihatsu YRV is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Suspension
    • 16% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (8 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.9% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.9% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.93% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.93% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.9% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.93% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.93% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.93% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.93% fail on Springs
      • 0.93% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.93% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.93% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.93% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 19% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 8.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.7% fail on Headlamp
    • 4.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.7% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.93% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.93% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.93% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.93% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.93% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.93% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.93% fail on Main beam tell-tale
    • 0.93% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.93% fail on Horn
  • 16% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 10% fail on Exhaust system (200% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Transmission
      • 1.9% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.9% fail on Joints
    • 0.93% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.93% fail on Pipe
  • 13% fail on Brakes
    • 7.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 5.6% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.8% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.8% fail on Rbt
          • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.93% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.9% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.9% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt
          • 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 2.8% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.9% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.9% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.93% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.93% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.93% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.93% fail on Pedal
  • 12% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 11% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 11% fail on Spark ignition
        • 8.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (150% worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 2.8% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 2.8% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.93% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.93% fail on Oxygen sensor
    • 0.93% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.93% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 9.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (200% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 9.3% fail on Seat belts (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 9.3% fail on Prescribed areas (8 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.93% fail on Requirements
  • 5.6% fail on Tyres
    • 2.8% fail on Condition
    • 2.8% fail on Tread depth
  • 4.7% fail on Visibility
    • 2.8% fail on Wipers
    • 1.9% fail on Washers
    • 0.93% fail on View to rear
      • 0.93% fail on Mirrors
  • 0.93% fail on Steering
    • 0.93% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.93% fail on Track rod end
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages