Daihatsu YRV MOT Results

Registered in 2002
45.1% pass rate
from 266 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Daihatsu YRV is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 8.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 7.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 6.8% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 6.0% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.3% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.75% fail on Rear lamps
    • 4.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.1% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.5% fail on Battery
    • 1.5% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.5% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.1% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.38% fail on Individual lamps
    • 1.1% fail on Horn
    • 0.38% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.38% fail on Fog lamp
  • 19% fail on Brakes
    • 9.4% fail on Brake performance
      • 7.1% fail on Front wheels (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.75% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.38% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 8.3% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 7.1% fail on Components
        • 6.4% fail on Pipes
        • 0.75% fail on Hoses
        • 0.38% fail on Reservoirs
      • 1.9% fail on Operation (16 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.38% fail on Leaks
    • 3.8% fail on Hub components
      • 2.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.5% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.75% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.38% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.38% fail on Pedal
        • 0.38% fail on Condition
  • 18% fail on Suspension
    • 15% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 13% fail on Component mounting (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Subframe mounting
      • 0.75% fail on Spring mounting
    • 1.1% fail on Suspension arms (76% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (75% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.75% fail on Rear
      • 0.38% fail on Front
    • 0.75% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.75% fail on Condition
    • 0.38% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.38% fail on Condition
    • 0.38% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.38% fail on Condition
    • 0.38% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.38% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.38% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 0.38% fail on Constant velocity joints
  • 13% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (61% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 7.1% fail on Exhaust system
    • 4.9% fail on Emissions
    • 3.4% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.1% fail on Pipe (11 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Cap
      • 0.38% fail on System
  • 12% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 8.3% fail on Wipers
    • 2.3% fail on Washers
    • 1.1% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.38% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.38% fail on Mirrors
  • 9.8% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Body condition (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Vehicle structure (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Chassis (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.38% fail on Seats
      • 0.38% fail on Passengers
  • 8.3% fail on Tyres
    • 4.9% fail on Condition
    • 3.8% fail on Tread depth
  • 4.1% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 4.1% fail on Seat belts
      • 4.1% fail on Prescribed areas (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Condition
  • 1.1% fail on Steering (77% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Steering system (74% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Track rod end
  • 0.38% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.38% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages