Daihatsu Terios MOT Results

Registered in 2009
75.8% pass rate
from 652 tests in 2020
(33% better than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Daihatsu Terios is unusually good or bad.

  • 8.7% fail on Brakes
    • 3.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.9% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.9% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.15% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.15% fail on Brake discs
    • 3.1% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.31% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.92% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.31% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.92% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.92% fail on Rbt
          • 0.77% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.15% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.31% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.31% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.31% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.31% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 0.31% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.31% fail on Lever
    • 0.31% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.15% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.15% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.15% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.15% fail on Pedal
    • 0.15% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.15% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 7.4% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (48% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim (62% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim (59% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.2% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.77% fail on Headlamps (76% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.77% fail on Headlamp (75% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.46% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (79% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Direction indicators (83% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Flashing type (83% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.15% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.31% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.31% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.31% fail on Rear fog lamp
  • 6.1% fail on Visibility
    • 4.9% fail on Wipers (91% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Washers
    • 0.31% fail on View to rear
      • 0.31% fail on Mirrors
  • 3.2% fail on Suspension (75% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.92% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (13 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.77% fail on Suspension arms (81% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.61% fail on Ball joint (69% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Pins and bushes (82% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.77% fail on Anti-roll bars (79% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.61% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Linkage
      • 0.15% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 0.61% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.15% fail on Springs
      • 0.15% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.15% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.15% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.15% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.15% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.15% fail on Sub-frame
  • 2.5% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 1.8% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.15% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.15% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.15% fail on Towbar
      • 0.15% fail on Towbar condition
    • 0.15% fail on Transmission
      • 0.15% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.15% fail on Joints
    • 0.15% fail on Seats
      • 0.15% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 2.1% fail on Steering
    • 2.1% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.1% fail on Track rod end
  • 1.2% fail on Tyres (81% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.77% fail on Tread depth (80% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.46% fail on Condition (85% better than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.77% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.61% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.31% fail on Prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Condition
    • 0.15% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.77% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (80% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.77% fail on Exhaust emissions (78% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.77% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.46% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.31% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.15% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.15% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages