Daihatsu Terios MOT Results
Registered in 200973.2% pass rate
from 609 tests in 2021
(33% better than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Daihatsu Terios is unusually good or bad.
-
9.7% fail on
Brakes
-
5.4% fail on
Brake performance
-
3.8% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.8% fail on
Rbt
- 3.4% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.99% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
3.8% fail on
Rbt
-
1.8% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.66% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.82% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.82% fail on
Rbt
- 0.82% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.82% fail on
Rbt
-
0.49% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.49% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.49% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.49% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
3.8% fail on
Service brake performance
- 3.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
3.0% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.5% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.5% fail on Brake pads
-
0.66% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.66% fail on Brake discs
-
0.33% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.33% fail on Cable
-
2.5% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.16% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.16% fail on Lever
-
0.16% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.16% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.16% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.16% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
5.4% fail on
Brake performance
-
6.6% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(48% better than other 2009 cars)
- 4.9% fail on Stop lamp
-
0.99% fail on
Headlamp aim
(69% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.99% fail on Headlamp aim (65% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.33% fail on
Headlamps
(90% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Headlamp (89% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (83% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.16% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.16% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.16% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.16% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.16% fail on Horn
-
6.2% fail on
Suspension
(57% better than other 2009 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.0% fail on Ball joint
- 0.66% fail on Pins and bushes
-
1.6% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(58% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.82% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.16% fail on Linkage
- 0.16% fail on Ball joint
- 0.16% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 1.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.66% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.49% fail on
Springs
(91% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.49% fail on
Coil springs
(91% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Coil spring (91% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.49% fail on
Coil springs
(91% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.33% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.33% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.16% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.16% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.16% fail on Pins and bushes
-
2.6% fail on
Suspension arms
-
4.8% fail on
Visibility
- 3.9% fail on Wipers
- 0.82% fail on Washers (73% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.16% fail on Windscreen
-
3.4% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 2.3% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.82% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.82% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Chassis
- 0.16% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.16% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.16% fail on Pipe
-
0.16% fail on
Transmission
-
0.16% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.16% fail on Joints
-
0.16% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.16% fail on
Body
- 0.16% fail on Other body component
-
2.5% fail on
Steering
-
2.5% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 2.5% fail on Track rod end
-
2.5% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
2.5% fail on
Tyres
(60% better than other 2009 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Tread depth
- 0.49% fail on Condition (83% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.66% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.66% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.66% fail on Prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.66% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.66% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(85% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.66% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(84% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.66% fail on
Spark ignition
(76% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.16% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.16% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.16% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.16% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
-
0.66% fail on
Spark ignition
(76% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.66% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(84% better than other 2009 cars)
Read the Honest John Review
-
Daihatsu Terios (2006 - 2009)
Better than the previous Terios model and decent off road.