Daihatsu Terios MOT Results

Registered in 2005
51.3% pass rate
from 807 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Daihatsu Terios is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Body, chassis, structure (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 8.4% fail on Transmission (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 7.8% fail on Drive shafts (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 7.8% fail on Joints (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.62% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.9% fail on Exhaust system (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Chassis (19 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 5.1% fail on Chassis condition (19 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.62% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.50% fail on Tank (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.37% fail on Body
      • 0.25% fail on Panel
      • 0.12% fail on Other body component
    • 0.25% fail on Towbar (9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Vehicle structure (19 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Cabs (18 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Prescribed areas (20 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.12% fail on Doors
      • 0.12% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.12% fail on Door condition
    • 0.12% fail on Seats
      • 0.12% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 19% fail on Suspension
    • 13% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.1% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.87% fail on Pins and bushes (68% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.62% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.9% fail on Springs (56% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Coil springs (67% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Coil spring (67% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (18 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Anti-roll bars (75% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.87% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.37% fail on Linkage
      • 0.12% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.12% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.99% fail on Sub-frames (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Sub-frame (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.12% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.74% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.62% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.37% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.12% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.25% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.12% fail on Suspension rod
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.12% fail on Axles
      • 0.12% fail on Axle
  • 15% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 15% fail on Exhaust emissions (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 15% fail on Spark ignition (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 7.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 7.3% fail on Catalyst emissions (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 2.6% fail on Emissions not tested (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.12% fail on NOx sensor
      • 0.99% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.74% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.12% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.12% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (37% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.9% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.9% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim (54% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim (50% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.2% fail on Horn (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 1.4% fail on Headlamps (74% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.99% fail on Headlamp (80% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.2% fail on Stop lamp (74% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.99% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.99% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.99% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.37% fail on Direction indicators (86% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Flashing type (86% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.37% fail on Individual direction indicators (80% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 10% fail on Brakes (26% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes (59% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Brake performance (52% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.4% fail on Rbt
          • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.74% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.12% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.12% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.37% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.37% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.25% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.25% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.12% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.37% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (91% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Rbt (sp) (94% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.25% fail on Parking brake performance (86% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Rbt (85% better than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.25% fail on Parking brake performance (83% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.2% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.2% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.62% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.62% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.99% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.99% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.37% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.25% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.12% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.25% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.12% fail on Pedal
      • 0.12% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.12% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 8.7% fail on Visibility
    • 5.6% fail on Wipers (50% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Washers
    • 0.12% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.12% fail on Windscreen
  • 6.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Seat belts (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 5.5% fail on Prescribed areas (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Condition
      • 0.12% fail on Attachment
  • 5.5% fail on Steering
    • 5.2% fail on Steering linkage components (66% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Track rod end (71% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.12% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.12% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.12% fail on Power steering
      • 0.12% fail on Other components
  • 4.6% fail on Tyres (39% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.12% fail on Size/type
  • 1.1% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.37% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.37% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages