Daihatsu Terios MOT Results
Registered in 200558.9% pass rate
from 803 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Daihatsu Terios is unusually good or bad.
-
16% fail on
Suspension
-
7.3% fail on
Prescribed areas
(7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 6.5% fail on Component mounting (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Subframe mounting (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.00% fail on Spring mounting (21 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
5.0% fail on
Drive shafts
-
5.0% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 4.9% fail on Constant velocity joints
- 0.12% fail on Couplings
-
5.0% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
1.7% fail on
Suspension arms
(60% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (67% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.50% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(77% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.50% fail on Linkage condition
- 0.25% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (94% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Attachment
- 0.12% fail on Condition
- 0.12% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
1.1% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 1.00% fail on Front
- 0.12% fail on Rear
-
1.00% fail on
Coil springs
(80% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.87% fail on Condition (83% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Location
- 1.00% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.50% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.50% fail on Condition
-
0.37% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.25% fail on Condition (13 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.25% fail on
Panhard rods
(51 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Attachment (275 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.25% fail on Condition
-
7.3% fail on
Prescribed areas
(7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
13% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(46% better than other 2005 cars)
- 6.1% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
4.6% fail on
Position lamps
- 4.4% fail on Front lamps
- 0.25% fail on Rear lamps (82% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim (81% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Horn
-
0.75% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.75% fail on Fog lamp
-
0.75% fail on
Direction indicators
(74% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.75% fail on
Flashing type
(74% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Individual lamps (81% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.12% fail on Tell tales
-
0.75% fail on
Flashing type
(74% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.62% fail on Stop lamp (87% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.50% fail on Battery
-
0.37% fail on
Headlamps
(91% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Headlamp (91% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Rear reflectors
-
12% fail on
Brakes
-
4.1% fail on
Hub components
- 4.0% fail on Brake pads
- 0.25% fail on Brake discs
-
4.0% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
4.0% fail on
Components
- 3.9% fail on Pipes
- 0.62% fail on Hoses
-
4.0% fail on
Components
-
3.5% fail on
Brake performance
(49% better than other 2005 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Front wheels
- 0.62% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.62% fail on Brake operation (14 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Service brake performance
- 2.2% fail on ABS (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.62% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.12% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.12% fail on Condition
-
0.12% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.12% fail on
Pedal
- 0.12% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.12% fail on
Pedal
-
4.1% fail on
Hub components
-
11% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(100% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 7.0% fail on Emissions (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.6% fail on Exhaust system
- 1.5% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.50% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.12% fail on Tank
- 0.12% fail on Pipe
- 0.12% fail on Cap
- 0.12% fail on System
-
7.3% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 5.7% fail on Wipers
- 2.0% fail on Washers
- 0.12% fail on Bonnet
-
6.0% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(150% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
5.9% fail on
Seat belts
(4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 5.0% fail on Prescribed areas (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.87% fail on Condition
- 0.12% fail on Requirements
-
0.12% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.12% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
5.9% fail on
Seat belts
(4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
5.0% fail on
Tyres
(43% better than other 2005 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Tread depth (49% better than other 2005 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Condition (45% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Valve stem
-
3.2% fail on
Steering
-
3.0% fail on
Steering system
- 3.0% fail on Track rod end
-
0.25% fail on
Power steering
- 0.12% fail on Operation
- 0.12% fail on Pipes and hoses
-
3.0% fail on
Steering system
-
3.1% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(130% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Vehicle structure
(11 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Chassis (11 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Body condition (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Seats
- 0.12% fail on Passengers
-
1.9% fail on
Vehicle structure
(11 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Towbars
(19 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Towbar
- 0.12% fail on Vehicle structure
-
0.25% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.25% fail on Attachment
-
0.25% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.25% fail on Registration plate