Daihatsu Terios MOT Results

Registered in 2005
58.9% pass rate
from 803 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Daihatsu Terios is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Suspension
    • 7.3% fail on Prescribed areas (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 6.5% fail on Component mounting (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Subframe mounting (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.00% fail on Spring mounting (21 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Drive shafts
      • 5.0% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 4.9% fail on Constant velocity joints
        • 0.12% fail on Couplings
    • 1.7% fail on Suspension arms (60% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (67% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Anti-roll bars (77% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.25% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (94% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Attachment
      • 0.12% fail on Condition
      • 0.12% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.1% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.00% fail on Front
      • 0.12% fail on Rear
    • 1.00% fail on Coil springs (80% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.87% fail on Condition (83% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Location
    • 1.00% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.50% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.50% fail on Condition
    • 0.37% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.25% fail on Condition (13 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.25% fail on Panhard rods (51 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Attachment (275 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.25% fail on Condition
  • 13% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (46% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 4.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.4% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.25% fail on Rear lamps (82% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim (81% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Horn
    • 0.75% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.75% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.75% fail on Direction indicators (74% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.75% fail on Flashing type (74% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.37% fail on Individual lamps (81% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.37% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.12% fail on Tell tales
    • 0.62% fail on Stop lamp (87% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.50% fail on Battery
    • 0.37% fail on Headlamps (91% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Headlamp (91% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 12% fail on Brakes
    • 4.1% fail on Hub components
      • 4.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.25% fail on Brake discs
    • 4.0% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 4.0% fail on Components
        • 3.9% fail on Pipes
        • 0.62% fail on Hoses
    • 3.5% fail on Brake performance (49% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.62% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.62% fail on Brake operation (14 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Service brake performance
    • 2.2% fail on ABS (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.62% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.12% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.12% fail on Condition
    • 0.12% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.12% fail on Pedal
        • 0.12% fail on Anti-slip
  • 11% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 7.0% fail on Emissions (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.5% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.50% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.12% fail on Tank
      • 0.12% fail on Pipe
      • 0.12% fail on Cap
      • 0.12% fail on System
  • 7.3% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.7% fail on Wipers
    • 2.0% fail on Washers
    • 0.12% fail on Bonnet
  • 6.0% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 5.9% fail on Seat belts (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 5.0% fail on Prescribed areas (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.87% fail on Condition
      • 0.12% fail on Requirements
    • 0.12% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.12% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 5.0% fail on Tyres (43% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Tread depth (49% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Condition (45% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Valve stem
  • 3.2% fail on Steering
    • 3.0% fail on Steering system
      • 3.0% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.25% fail on Power steering
      • 0.12% fail on Operation
      • 0.12% fail on Pipes and hoses
  • 3.1% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Vehicle structure (11 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Chassis (11 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Body condition (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Seats
      • 0.12% fail on Passengers
  • 0.25% fail on Towbars (19 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Towbar
    • 0.12% fail on Vehicle structure
  • 0.25% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.25% fail on Attachment
  • 0.25% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.25% fail on Registration plate

Search Good Garages