Daihatsu Terios MOT Results

Registered in 2004
48.2% pass rate
from 533 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 cars and highlighted areas where the Daihatsu Terios is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Body, chassis, structure (170% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 9.9% fail on Chassis (24 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 9.9% fail on Chassis condition (24 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 9.0% fail on Transmission (140% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 8.1% fail on Drive shafts (130% worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 8.1% fail on Joints (130% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.94% fail on Prop shafts (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.94% fail on Joints (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 6.8% fail on Exhaust system (95% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.75% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.56% fail on Tank
      • 0.19% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.75% fail on Cabs (32 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.75% fail on Prescribed areas (35 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.38% fail on Body
      • 0.38% fail on Panel
    • 0.19% fail on Doors
      • 0.19% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.19% fail on Door condition
    • 0.19% fail on Undertray
  • 24% fail on Suspension (33% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 14% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 11% fail on Suspension arms (82% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 8.1% fail on Ball joint (190% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.94% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.94% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.75% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (15 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Springs
      • 1.9% fail on Coil springs
        • 1.9% fail on Coil spring
      • 0.19% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.9% fail on Anti-roll bars (70% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.94% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.56% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (8 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.19% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.19% fail on Linkage
    • 1.3% fail on Sub-frames (190% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.94% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.94% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.56% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.19% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.19% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.56% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.56% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.19% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.19% fail on Suspension rod
  • 16% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (100% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 16% fail on Exhaust emissions (120% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 16% fail on Spark ignition (170% worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 9.8% fail on Catalyst emissions (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 8.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (140% worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 2.8% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.19% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.19% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 12% fail on Brakes
    • 4.5% fail on Brake performance (41% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.0% fail on Rbt
          • 2.1% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.19% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.19% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.1% fail on Brake performance not tested (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.56% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.56% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.56% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.56% fail on Rbt
          • 0.19% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.19% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.19% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
    • 4.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.8% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 3.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.38% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.38% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.19% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.19% fail on Cable
    • 0.56% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.56% fail on Pedal
    • 0.56% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.56% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (42% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim (55% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.9% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.19% fail on All position lamps
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamps (66% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp (64% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.75% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.75% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.75% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.75% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.75% fail on Horn
    • 0.38% fail on Direction indicators (87% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Flashing type (87% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.38% fail on Individual direction indicators (79% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.19% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.19% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 9.8% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 9.8% fail on Seat belts (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 9.4% fail on Prescribed areas (8 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.94% fail on Condition
      • 0.19% fail on Requirements
  • 8.1% fail on Visibility
    • 5.8% fail on Wipers
    • 2.1% fail on Washers
    • 0.38% fail on View to rear
      • 0.38% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.19% fail on Driver's view
  • 5.4% fail on Steering
    • 5.4% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 5.3% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.19% fail on Ball joint
  • 4.5% fail on Tyres (40% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.38% fail on Size/type
  • 0.94% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.94% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.19% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.19% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages