MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Daihatsu » Terios » 2003

Daihatsu Terios MOT Results

Registered in 2003
51.0% pass rate
from 339 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Daihatsu Terios is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Body, chassis, structure (170% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 12% fail on Transmission (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 11% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 11% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Prop shafts (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.59% fail on Joints
        • 0.29% fail on Flexible couplings
    • 8.6% fail on Chassis (14 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 8.6% fail on Chassis condition (14 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 7.7% fail on Exhaust system (130% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Body (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Panel
      • 0.29% fail on Body condition
      • 0.29% fail on Mounting fixings
    • 0.29% fail on Seats
      • 0.29% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.29% fail on Cabs
      • 0.29% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 22% fail on Suspension
    • 14% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 6.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.2% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.5% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.88% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.29% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.5% fail on Springs
      • 1.5% fail on Coil springs
        • 1.5% fail on Coil spring
    • 1.5% fail on Sub-frames
      • 1.5% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.88% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.29% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.29% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.29% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.59% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.59% fail on Anti-roll bars (88% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 0.29% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.29% fail on Suspension rod
  • 12% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (63% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 12% fail on Exhaust emissions (72% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 12% fail on Spark ignition (91% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 6.5% fail on Catalyst emissions (110% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 4.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 3.5% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.29% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.29% fail on Other emission control equipment
      • 0.59% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.29% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.29% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.29% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.29% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 11% fail on Brakes
    • 5.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.8% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.5% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 3.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.88% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.88% fail on Brake discs
    • 3.8% fail on Brake performance (50% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.7% fail on Rbt
          • 2.4% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.29% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.8% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.88% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.88% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.29% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
  • 8.3% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (51% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim (70% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.29% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.29% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.29% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.29% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.29% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.29% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.29% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.29% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.29% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.29% fail on Battery(ies)
  • 7.1% fail on Visibility
    • 5.6% fail on Wipers
    • 2.1% fail on Washers
  • 7.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (130% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 7.1% fail on Seat belts (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 6.5% fail on Prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Requirements
      • 0.29% fail on Condition
  • 4.7% fail on Steering
    • 4.4% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 3.8% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.59% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.29% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 1.8% fail on Tyres (70% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.59% fail on Condition
  • 0.59% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.59% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages