Daihatsu Terios MOT Results

Registered in 2003
44.3% pass rate
from 575 tests in 2020
(20% worse than other 2003 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Daihatsu Terios is unusually good or bad.

  • 27% fail on Suspension (48% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 15% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 11% fail on Suspension arms (69% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 7.7% fail on Ball joint (170% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 1.4% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.35% fail on Suspension arm
    • 1.7% fail on Springs
      • 1.4% fail on Coil springs (61% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Coil spring (60% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.17% fail on Mounting
      • 0.35% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Sub-frames (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (75% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.87% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.17% fail on Linkage
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.17% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.87% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.52% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.35% fail on Other suspension component (9 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.52% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.52% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.17% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.17% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.17% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.35% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.17% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.17% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.17% fail on Wheel bearings
  • 26% fail on Body, chassis, structure (160% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 10% fail on Chassis (20 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 10% fail on Chassis condition (20 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 9.9% fail on Transmission (170% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 9.7% fail on Drive shafts (180% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 9.7% fail on Joints (180% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.35% fail on Joints
    • 7.5% fail on Exhaust system (98% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Sub-frame (13 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.35% fail on Sub-frame condition (14 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.52% fail on Body
      • 0.35% fail on Panel
      • 0.17% fail on Mounting fixings
    • 0.35% fail on Cabs (14 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Prescribed areas (16 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.17% fail on Tank
    • 0.17% fail on Doors
      • 0.17% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.17% fail on Catch
  • 18% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (110% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 18% fail on Exhaust emissions (130% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 17% fail on Spark ignition (160% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 10% fail on Catalyst emissions (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 7.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (110% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 2.4% fail on Emissions not tested (170% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.35% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.17% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
    • 0.17% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.17% fail on Other leaks
  • 11% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (45% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Stop lamp (58% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.9% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.6% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.35% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim (68% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim (65% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.4% fail on Position lamps (59% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Position lamp (58% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.70% fail on Horn
      • 0.35% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.17% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.87% fail on Headlamps (84% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.87% fail on Headlamp (83% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 10% fail on Brakes (33% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 4.2% fail on Brake linings and pads (86% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 4.2% fail on Brake pads (88% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.52% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.17% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.17% fail on Cable
    • 4.0% fail on Brake performance (50% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.1% fail on Rbt
          • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.35% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.9% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.70% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.87% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (79% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.87% fail on Rbt (sp) (78% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Parking brake performance (80% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.35% fail on Rbt (80% better than other 2003 cars)
          • 0.35% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.17% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.17% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.17% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.17% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.17% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.17% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.17% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.17% fail on Other braking system component
    • 0.17% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.17% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 8.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (160% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 8.2% fail on Seat belts (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 6.8% fail on Prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Condition
      • 0.17% fail on Requirements
      • 0.17% fail on Load limiters
    • 0.35% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 7.8% fail on Visibility
    • 5.7% fail on Wipers
    • 3.0% fail on Washers
    • 0.17% fail on Driver's view
  • 5.0% fail on Steering
    • 4.3% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 4.0% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.17% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.52% fail on Power steering
      • 0.35% fail on Operation
      • 0.17% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.17% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.17% fail on Steering rack
  • 3.1% fail on Tyres (57% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.52% fail on Condition (82% better than other 2003 cars)
  • 0.52% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.52% fail on Attachment
  • 0.35% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.35% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.17% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.17% fail on Anchorages

Search Good Garages