Daihatsu Terios MOT Results

Registered in 2002
45.9% pass rate
from 591 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Daihatsu Terios is unusually good or bad.

  • 35% fail on Suspension (59% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 19% fail on Prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 16% fail on Component mounting (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Subframe mounting (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Spring mounting (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 15% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 15% fail on Front drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 15% fail on Constant velocity joints (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.17% fail on Drive shafts
    • 7.1% fail on Suspension arms (48% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 6.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.51% fail on Condition
    • 2.2% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 2.0% fail on Coil springs (51% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.68% fail on Anti-roll bars (88% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.17% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.17% fail on Linkage condition
    • 0.51% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.51% fail on Condition
    • 0.51% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.51% fail on Condition
    • 0.34% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.17% fail on Condition
      • 0.17% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.17% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.17% fail on Attachment
    • 0.17% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.17% fail on Condition
    • 0.17% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.17% fail on Front
  • 19% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (29% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 8.0% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 6.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.6% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.51% fail on Rear lamps (74% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.0% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.85% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.34% fail on Side repeaters
    • 2.2% fail on Stop lamp (66% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim (71% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.5% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.17% fail on Tell tale
    • 1.2% fail on Headlamps (75% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp (74% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.85% fail on Horn
    • 0.34% fail on Battery
    • 0.17% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.17% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.17% fail on Switch
    • 0.17% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 14% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (71% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 9.0% fail on Exhaust system (97% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 7.8% fail on Emissions (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Emissions not tested (180% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.17% fail on Cap
  • 13% fail on Brakes
    • 6.3% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 6.1% fail on Components
        • 5.2% fail on Pipes
        • 0.68% fail on Hoses
        • 0.17% fail on Cylinders
        • 0.17% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.34% fail on Leaks
    • 4.1% fail on Hub components
      • 4.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.51% fail on Brake discs
    • 4.1% fail on Brake performance (54% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.68% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.68% fail on Parking brake performance (85% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.17% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.17% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.51% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.17% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.17% fail on Pedal
        • 0.17% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.17% fail on ABS
  • 13% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 13% fail on Seat belts (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 12% fail on Prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Condition
    • 0.51% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.51% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 12% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 7.8% fail on Vehicle structure (12 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 7.8% fail on Chassis (12 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Body condition (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Seats
      • 0.17% fail on Passengers
  • 9.3% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.6% fail on Wipers
    • 2.9% fail on Washers
    • 0.51% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.17% fail on Mirrors
  • 6.3% fail on Tyres
    • 5.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.4% fail on Condition (65% better than other 2002 cars)
  • 5.8% fail on Steering
    • 5.1% fail on Steering system
      • 4.6% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.34% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.17% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.34% fail on Power steering
      • 0.17% fail on Operation
      • 0.17% fail on Drive system
    • 0.17% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.17% fail on Locking devices
  • 2.0% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 2.0% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.17% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.17% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages