Daihatsu Terios MOT Results

Registered in 2002

52.4% pass rate

from 187 tests in 2021

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Daihatsu Terios is unusually good or bad.

24% fail on Body, chassis, structure (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 14% fail on Transmission (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 14% fail on Drive shafts (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    - 14% fail on Joints (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 8.0% fail on Exhaust system (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 5.9% fail on Chassis (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 5.9% fail on Chassis condition (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure
  - 1.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
- 0.53% fail on Towbar
  - 0.53% fail on Towbar condition
23% fail on Suspension
- 17% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 8.0% fail on Suspension arms
  - 4.8% fail on Ball joint
  - 2.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  - 1.6% fail on Pins and bushes
- 1.6% fail on Shock absorbers
- 1.1% fail on Springs
  - 0.53% fail on Coil springs
    - 0.53% fail on Coil spring
  - 0.53% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
- 1.1% fail on Anti-roll bars
  - 1.1% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.53% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.53% fail on Sub-frames
  - 0.53% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
14% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (100% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 14% fail on Exhaust emissions (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 14% fail on Spark ignition (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
    - 8.6% fail on Catalyst emissions (170% worse than other 2002 cars)
    - 4.8% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    - 3.2% fail on Emissions not tested (190% worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 0.53% fail on Compression ignition
    - 0.53% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
8.6% fail on Visibility
- 5.3% fail on Wipers
- 2.7% fail on Washers
- 0.53% fail on Condition of glass
  - 0.53% fail on Windscreen
7.5% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (55% better than other 2002 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Headlamps
  - 2.7% fail on Headlamp
- 2.7% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
  - 2.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 2.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 2.1% fail on Stop lamp
- 1.1% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 1.1% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.53% fail on Direction indicators
  - 0.53% fail on Flashing type
    - 0.53% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.53% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
5.9% fail on Steering
- 5.3% fail on Steering linkage components
  - 5.3% fail on Track rod end
- 0.53% fail on Power steering
  - 0.53% fail on Operation
5.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 5.3% fail on Seat belts (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 5.3% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 0.53% fail on Condition
4.8% fail on Brakes (66% better than other 2002 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Mechanical brake components
  - 2.1% fail on Brake linings and pads
    - 2.1% fail on Brake pads
  - 0.53% fail on Brake discs and drums
    - 0.53% fail on Brake discs
- 2.1% fail on Brake performance (73% better than other 2002 cars)
  - 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
    - 1.1% fail on Rbt
      - 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
    - 0.53% fail on Plate brake tester
      - 0.53% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
  - 0.53% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 0.53% fail on Rigid brake pipes
3.7% fail on Tyres
- 2.1% fail on Tread depth
- 1.6% fail on Condition
0.53% fail on Seat belt installation check
- 0.53% fail on Anchorages
0.53% fail on Road Wheels
- 0.53% fail on Attachment