Daihatsu Terios MOT Results
Registered in 200245.9% pass rate
from 591 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Daihatsu Terios is unusually good or bad.
-
35% fail on
Suspension
(59% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
19% fail on
Prescribed areas
(5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 16% fail on Component mounting (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Subframe mounting (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Spring mounting (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
15% fail on
Drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
15% fail on
Front drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 15% fail on Constant velocity joints (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.17% fail on Drive shafts
-
15% fail on
Front drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
7.1% fail on
Suspension arms
(48% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 6.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.51% fail on Condition
- 2.2% fail on Front suspension joints
-
2.0% fail on
Coil springs
(51% better than other 2002 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Condition
-
0.68% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(88% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.17% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.17% fail on Linkage condition
-
0.51% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.51% fail on Condition
-
0.51% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.51% fail on Condition
-
0.34% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.17% fail on Condition
- 0.17% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.17% fail on
Bonded suspension
- 0.17% fail on Attachment
-
0.17% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.17% fail on Condition
-
0.17% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.17% fail on Front
-
19% fail on
Prescribed areas
(5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
19% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(29% better than other 2002 cars)
- 8.0% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
6.1% fail on
Position lamps
- 5.6% fail on Front lamps
- 0.51% fail on Rear lamps (74% better than other 2002 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.2% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.0% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.85% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.34% fail on Side repeaters
-
3.2% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.2% fail on Stop lamp (66% better than other 2002 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim (71% better than other 2002 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.5% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.17% fail on Tell tale
-
1.2% fail on
Headlamps
(75% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Headlamp (74% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.85% fail on Horn
- 0.34% fail on Battery
- 0.17% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.17% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.17% fail on Switch
- 0.17% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
14% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(71% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 9.0% fail on Exhaust system (97% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 7.8% fail on Emissions (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Emissions not tested (180% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.17% fail on Cap
-
13% fail on
Brakes
-
6.3% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
6.1% fail on
Components
- 5.2% fail on Pipes
- 0.68% fail on Hoses
- 0.17% fail on Cylinders
- 0.17% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.34% fail on Leaks
-
6.1% fail on
Components
-
4.1% fail on
Hub components
- 4.1% fail on Brake pads
- 0.51% fail on Brake discs
-
4.1% fail on
Brake performance
(54% better than other 2002 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Front wheels
- 0.68% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.68% fail on Parking brake performance (85% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.17% fail on Rear wheels
- 0.17% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 0.51% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.17% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.17% fail on
Pedal
- 0.17% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.17% fail on
Pedal
- 0.17% fail on ABS
-
6.3% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
13% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
13% fail on
Seat belts
(3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 12% fail on Prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.68% fail on Condition
-
0.51% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.51% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
13% fail on
Seat belts
(3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
12% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
7.8% fail on
Vehicle structure
(12 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 7.8% fail on Chassis (12 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 4.7% fail on Body condition (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Seats
- 0.17% fail on Passengers
-
7.8% fail on
Vehicle structure
(12 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
9.3% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 6.6% fail on Wipers
- 2.9% fail on Washers
- 0.51% fail on Windscreen
- 0.17% fail on Mirrors
-
6.3% fail on
Tyres
- 5.4% fail on Tread depth
- 1.4% fail on Condition (65% better than other 2002 cars)
-
5.8% fail on
Steering
-
5.1% fail on
Steering system
- 4.6% fail on Track rod end
- 0.34% fail on Ball joint
- 0.17% fail on Steering rack
-
0.34% fail on
Power steering
- 0.17% fail on Operation
- 0.17% fail on Drive system
- 0.17% fail on Steering operation
- 0.17% fail on Locking devices
-
5.1% fail on
Steering system
-
2.0% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 2.0% fail on Registration plate
-
0.17% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.17% fail on Attachment