Daihatsu Terios MOT Results

Registered in 2000
47.3% pass rate
from 148 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Daihatsu Terios is unusually good or bad.

  • 30% fail on Suspension (72% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 18% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 8.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.7% fail on Ball joint
      • 3.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.68% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 6.1% fail on Sub-frames (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 5.4% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (13 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Sub-frame
    • 3.4% fail on Springs
      • 3.4% fail on Coil springs
        • 3.4% fail on Coil spring
    • 2.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.68% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.68% fail on Linkage
      • 0.68% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 0.68% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.68% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.68% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.68% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.68% fail on Ball joint
  • 24% fail on Body, chassis, structure (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 12% fail on Chassis (9 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 12% fail on Chassis condition (10 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 8.8% fail on Transmission (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 8.1% fail on Drive shafts (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 8.1% fail on Joints (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.68% fail on Joints
    • 6.8% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.4% fail on Body
      • 0.68% fail on Panel
      • 0.68% fail on Other body component
    • 1.4% fail on Seats
      • 0.68% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.68% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.68% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.68% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.68% fail on Towbar
      • 0.68% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.68% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.68% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.68% fail on Floor
    • 0.68% fail on Cabs
      • 0.68% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 18% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (82% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 18% fail on Exhaust emissions (92% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 16% fail on Spark ignition (91% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 10% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 4.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 2.7% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 1.4% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.68% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.68% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 15% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.7% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.7% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 2.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 2.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.4% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.68% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.68% fail on Headlamp
  • 15% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 15% fail on Seat belts (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 14% fail on Prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Condition
      • 0.68% fail on Requirements
    • 0.68% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 11% fail on Brakes
    • 6.1% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.4% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.4% fail on Rbt
          • 2.7% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.68% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.68% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.68% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.68% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.68% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.68% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.68% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 2.7% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.0% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.4% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.4% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.68% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.68% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.68% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.68% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.68% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
  • 8.1% fail on Visibility
    • 6.1% fail on Wipers
    • 2.0% fail on Washers
    • 0.68% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.68% fail on View to rear
      • 0.68% fail on Mirrors
  • 2.7% fail on Tyres
    • 1.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.68% fail on Size/type
    • 0.68% fail on Condition
  • 1.4% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plates
  • 1.4% fail on Steering
    • 1.4% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.68% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.68% fail on Track rod end

Search Good Garages