Daihatsu Sirion MOT Results
Registered in 200973.0% pass rate
from 1,031 tests in 2021
(31% better than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Daihatsu Sirion is unusually good or bad.
-
10% fail on
Suspension
(30% better than other 2009 cars)
-
5.3% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 3.5% fail on Linkage ball joints (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.97% fail on Ball joint (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.48% fail on Linkage
- 0.097% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.097% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.097% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.097% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
-
4.1% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.4% fail on Ball joint
- 0.58% fail on Pins and bushes (70% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.097% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.87% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.48% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.39% fail on Ball joint
- 0.097% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.39% fail on
Axles
- 0.39% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
- 0.39% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
0.29% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.097% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.097% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.097% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
0.19% fail on
Springs
(97% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Coil springs
(97% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Coil spring (97% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Coil springs
(97% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.097% fail on Shock absorbers
-
5.3% fail on
Anti-roll bars
-
6.7% fail on
Brakes
- 2.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Brake performance
(54% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.97% fail on
Service brake performance
(60% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.87% fail on
Rbt
(64% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.78% fail on Service brake performance (63% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.097% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.097% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.097% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.87% fail on
Rbt
(64% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.97% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.97% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
0.58% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.58% fail on
Rbt
- 0.48% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.097% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.58% fail on
Rbt
- 0.097% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.97% fail on
Service brake performance
(60% better than other 2009 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(45% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.97% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.97% fail on Brake discs
-
0.87% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(57% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.87% fail on Brake pads (57% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.97% fail on
Brake discs and drums
-
0.48% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.48% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
0.39% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.39% fail on Pedal
-
0.29% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.29% fail on Lever
-
6.2% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(51% better than other 2009 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.2% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.2% fail on Headlamp
-
0.97% fail on
Headlamp aim
(69% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.87% fail on Headlamp aim (69% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.097% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.29% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (85% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.19% fail on Battery(ies)
-
0.097% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.097% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.097% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
0.097% fail on
Flashing type
-
5.6% fail on
Visibility
- 4.6% fail on Wipers (66% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Washers (62% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.097% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.097% fail on Windscreen
-
0.097% fail on
View to rear
- 0.097% fail on Mirrors
-
4.1% fail on
Tyres
(34% better than other 2009 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Tread depth
- 1.5% fail on Condition (51% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Size/type
-
2.7% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(42% better than other 2009 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.87% fail on
Transmission
-
0.87% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.87% fail on Joints
-
0.87% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.29% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.29% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
- 0.19% fail on Bumpers
-
0.097% fail on
Chassis
- 0.097% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.097% fail on
Body
- 0.097% fail on Other body component
-
2.2% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(49% better than other 2009 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(51% better than other 2009 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Spark ignition
- 1.3% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.39% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.29% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (76% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.097% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
2.0% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.19% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.097% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.097% fail on Other leaks
-
2.0% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(51% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.78% fail on
Steering
(67% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.39% fail on
Steering linkage components
(80% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Track rod end (89% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.097% fail on Ball joint
-
0.097% fail on
Other components
- 0.097% fail on Steering component
-
0.29% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.29% fail on Steering rack
-
0.097% fail on
Steering play
- 0.097% fail on Steering rack
-
0.39% fail on
Steering linkage components
(80% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(73% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.097% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.097% fail on Attachment
- 0.097% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.19% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.19% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.19% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review
-
Daihatsu Sirion (2005 - 2009)
Decent small hatchback based on a Toyota Yaris. Reliable and robust. Strong 1.3 engine. Good value for money.