Daihatsu Sirion MOT Results

Registered in 2009
79.7% pass rate
from 973 tests in 2017
(38% better than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Daihatsu Sirion is unusually good or bad.

  • 6.7% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (57% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim (41% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.2% fail on Headlamps (53% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp (51% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.92% fail on Position lamps (75% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Front lamps (72% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Rear lamps
    • 0.82% fail on Registration plate lamp (80% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Battery
  • 5.7% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.9% fail on Wipers (75% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Washers
    • 0.10% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.6% fail on Tyres (35% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.7% fail on Condition (50% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Size/type
    • 0.10% fail on Valve stem
  • 4.5% fail on Brakes
    • 1.5% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 1.4% fail on Components (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Pipes (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on Hoses
      • 0.10% fail on Leaks
    • 1.5% fail on Hub components
      • 1.0% fail on Brake pads (56% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.10% fail on Brake calipers
    • 1.5% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.92% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.31% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.21% fail on Rear wheels (86% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Parking brake performance (79% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on ABS
    • 0.10% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.10% fail on Condition
    • 0.10% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.10% fail on Pedal
        • 0.10% fail on Condition
    • 0.10% fail on Restricted movement
  • 4.2% fail on Suspension (61% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.4% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.31% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.10% fail on Linkage condition
    • 0.62% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.41% fail on Rear
      • 0.21% fail on Front
    • 0.51% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.51% fail on Condition
    • 0.31% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.31% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 0.31% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 0.21% fail on Suspension arms (89% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (89% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.10% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.10% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.10% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.10% fail on Subframe mounting
  • 0.72% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (64% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.51% fail on Emissions
    • 0.21% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.10% fail on Exhaust system
  • 0.31% fail on Steering (74% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Steering system
      • 0.21% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.10% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.31% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.21% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.21% fail on Condition
    • 0.10% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.10% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.21% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.21% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.10% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.10% fail on Body condition
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages