Daihatsu Sirion MOT Results

Registered in 2009
73.9% pass rate
from 1,109 tests in 2020
(30% better than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Daihatsu Sirion is unusually good or bad.

  • 8.9% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (36% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.27% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamps (49% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp (47% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.63% fail on Position lamps (72% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Position lamp (75% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.090% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.63% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.36% fail on Horn
      • 0.18% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.090% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.36% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (84% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.090% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.090% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.090% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.090% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.090% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.090% fail on Rear fog lamp
  • 6.8% fail on Suspension (47% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.0% fail on Linkage ball joints (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.90% fail on Ball joint (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Linkage
      • 0.18% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.18% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.090% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.090% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.1% fail on Suspension arms (48% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.18% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.090% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.090% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.45% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.27% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.18% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.090% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.090% fail on Axles
      • 0.090% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.090% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.090% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.090% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.090% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 5.0% fail on Tyres
    • 3.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.3% fail on Condition (58% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Size/type
  • 4.5% fail on Visibility
    • 3.4% fail on Wipers
    • 0.99% fail on Washers (63% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.090% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.090% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.090% fail on View to rear
      • 0.090% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.4% fail on Brakes (44% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Mechanical brake components (41% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.72% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.72% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.5% fail on Brake performance (60% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.90% fail on Service brake performance (57% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.90% fail on Rbt (56% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.72% fail on Service brake performance (58% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.27% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.54% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (66% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.54% fail on Rbt (sp) (64% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.45% fail on Rbt
          • 0.45% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.18% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.18% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.090% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.090% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 1.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.45% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.45% fail on Pedal (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.090% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.090% fail on Lever
    • 0.090% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.090% fail on Brake fluid
  • 2.0% fail on Body, chassis, structure (50% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.99% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.99% fail on Transmission
      • 0.90% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.90% fail on Joints
      • 0.090% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.090% fail on Joints
    • 0.18% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.090% fail on Body
      • 0.090% fail on Other body component
  • 2.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (47% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Exhaust emissions (44% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.5% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.45% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.18% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.090% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.090% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    • 0.090% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.090% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 0.54% fail on Steering (72% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.36% fail on Steering linkage components (77% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Track rod end (75% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Steering coupling (29 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Universal joint (33 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.27% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.27% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.27% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.18% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.090% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.090% fail on Condition
  • 0.090% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.090% fail on Belt(s)/padding
  • 0.090% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.090% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages