Daihatsu Sirion MOT Results

Registered in 2005
69.8% pass rate
from 1,240 tests in 2017
(33% better than other 2005 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Daihatsu Sirion is unusually good or bad.

  • 12% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (49% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.0% fail on Position lamps (52% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Front lamps (43% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.081% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.081% fail on Rear lamps
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim (57% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Registration plate lamp (60% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Headlamps (48% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp (46% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Battery
    • 0.16% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.081% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.081% fail on Horn
  • 11% fail on Suspension (41% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.7% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.89% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.56% fail on Attachment (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Linkage condition
    • 2.3% fail on Suspension arms (48% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (49% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Condition
    • 2.2% fail on Prescribed areas (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Component mounting (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Subframe mounting (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.97% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.73% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.73% fail on Condition
    • 0.73% fail on Drive shafts (80% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.73% fail on Front drive shafts (79% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.73% fail on Constant velocity joints (79% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.48% fail on Coil springs (90% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Condition (90% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Wheel bearings (73% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Front
    • 0.16% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.16% fail on Condition
    • 0.081% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.081% fail on Condition
  • 7.7% fail on Brakes (42% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 3.1% fail on Components
        • 2.8% fail on Pipes
        • 0.16% fail on Hoses (80% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.081% fail on Cylinders
        • 0.081% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.081% fail on Servos
      • 0.40% fail on Leaks
      • 0.16% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.081% fail on Operation
    • 2.7% fail on Brake performance (60% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.89% fail on Parking brake performance (77% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Rear wheels (86% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.24% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.16% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.081% fail on Brake operation
    • 2.4% fail on Hub components
      • 1.9% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.89% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.48% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.48% fail on Condition
    • 0.32% fail on ABS
    • 0.32% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.16% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.16% fail on Pedal
        • 0.16% fail on Condition
    • 0.16% fail on Prescribed areas (15 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings (76 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  • 6.1% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.4% fail on Wipers
    • 0.97% fail on Washers (70% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.081% fail on Windscreen
  • 5.2% fail on Tyres (40% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Tread depth (44% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Condition (37% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Size/type
  • 4.1% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 2.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.8% fail on Emissions
    • 0.65% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.24% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.16% fail on Pipe
      • 0.081% fail on System
  • 1.7% fail on Steering (58% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Steering system (59% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.97% fail on Track rod end (61% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.24% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.16% fail on Power steering
      • 0.16% fail on Electronic power steering
      • 0.081% fail on Operation
    • 0.081% fail on Locking devices
  • 1.2% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (50% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.81% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.73% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.081% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 0.48% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.24% fail on Condition
      • 0.24% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 1.2% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.65% fail on Vehicle structure (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Chassis (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Body condition
    • 0.16% fail on Seats
      • 0.16% fail on Drivers
    • 0.081% fail on Body security
  • 0.65% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.65% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.081% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.081% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages