Daihatsu Sirion MOT Results

Registered in 2005
60.1% pass rate
from 1,016 tests in 2021
(10% better than other 2005 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Daihatsu Sirion is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Suspension
    • 8.8% fail on Suspension arms (48% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 7.6% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.39% fail on Pins and bushes (85% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 6.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.9% fail on Linkage ball joints (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint (200% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (70% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.20% fail on Linkage
      • 0.20% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 4.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Sub-frames (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.89% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.098% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.69% fail on Springs (85% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Coil springs (87% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.59% fail on Coil spring (87% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.098% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.30% fail on Wheel bearings (79% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.20% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.098% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.098% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.098% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.098% fail on Ball joint
  • 9.9% fail on Brakes (25% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Brake performance (41% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.1% fail on Rbt
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.79% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.98% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.39% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (72% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (70% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.89% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.79% fail on Rbt
          • 0.69% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.098% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.098% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.098% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.39% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.7% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.0% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.0% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.098% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.3% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.3% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.098% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.098% fail on Lever
    • 0.39% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.20% fail on Master cylinder (26 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Reservoirs (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.39% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (73% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.30% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.30% fail on Pedal
    • 0.20% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.098% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.098% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 8.2% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (49% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamps (49% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp (46% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.20% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.49% fail on Direction indicators (81% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Flashing type (81% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.39% fail on Individual direction indicators (78% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.098% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.098% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.098% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.098% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.098% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.098% fail on Battery(ies)
  • 7.6% fail on Visibility
    • 5.3% fail on Wipers
    • 1.8% fail on Washers (51% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on View to rear
      • 0.30% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.20% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.098% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.098% fail on Windscreen
  • 6.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.1% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Chassis (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.98% fail on Chassis condition (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.098% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 1.1% fail on Transmission (70% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.98% fail on Drive shafts (71% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.98% fail on Joints (70% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.098% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.098% fail on Joints
    • 0.39% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.30% fail on Doors
      • 0.30% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.30% fail on Door condition
    • 0.098% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.098% fail on Hose
    • 0.098% fail on Floor
  • 4.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (33% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.4% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.3% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 1.9% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.59% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.20% fail on Compression ignition (86% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.20% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
  • 4.3% fail on Tyres (33% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.9% fail on Condition
    • 0.20% fail on Size/type
  • 3.6% fail on Steering
    • 2.3% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.1% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.098% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.098% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.69% fail on Electronic power steering (9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.39% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.39% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.30% fail on Power steering
      • 0.30% fail on Operation
    • 0.098% fail on Steering column
    • 0.098% fail on Steering play
      • 0.098% fail on Steering rack
  • 2.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.79% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.49% fail on Condition
    • 1.3% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.79% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.79% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages