Daihatsu Sirion MOT Results
Registered in 200560.1% pass rate
from 1,016 tests in 2021
(10% better than other 2005 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Daihatsu Sirion is unusually good or bad.
-
18% fail on
Suspension
-
8.8% fail on
Suspension arms
(48% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 7.6% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.59% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.39% fail on Pins and bushes (85% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
6.6% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 3.9% fail on Linkage ball joints (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Ball joint (200% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (70% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.20% fail on Linkage
- 0.20% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 4.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Sub-frames
(130% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.89% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.098% fail on Sub-frame
-
0.69% fail on
Springs
(85% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.59% fail on
Coil springs
(87% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.59% fail on Coil spring (87% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.098% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
0.59% fail on
Coil springs
(87% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Wheel bearings (79% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.20% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.098% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.098% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.098% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.098% fail on Ball joint
-
8.8% fail on
Suspension arms
(48% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
9.9% fail on
Brakes
(25% better than other 2005 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Brake performance
(41% better than other 2005 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.1% fail on
Rbt
- 1.5% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.79% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
2.1% fail on
Rbt
-
1.3% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
1.3% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.98% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.39% fail on Service brake performance
-
1.3% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
1.2% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(72% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (70% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.89% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.79% fail on
Rbt
- 0.69% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.098% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.098% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.098% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.79% fail on
Rbt
- 0.39% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
2.1% fail on
Service brake performance
- 3.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
2.7% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.0% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.0% fail on Brake pads
- 0.098% fail on Brake linings
-
1.3% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.3% fail on Brake discs
-
0.098% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.098% fail on Lever
-
2.0% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.39% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.20% fail on Master cylinder (26 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Reservoirs (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.39% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(73% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
0.30% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.30% fail on Pedal
-
0.20% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.098% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 0.098% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
4.3% fail on
Brake performance
(41% better than other 2005 cars)
-
8.2% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(49% better than other 2005 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.7% fail on
Headlamps
(49% better than other 2005 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Headlamp (46% better than other 2005 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.20% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 1.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.49% fail on
Direction indicators
(81% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.49% fail on
Flashing type
(81% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Individual direction indicators (78% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.098% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.49% fail on
Flashing type
(81% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.098% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.098% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.098% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.098% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.098% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.098% fail on Battery(ies)
-
7.6% fail on
Visibility
- 5.3% fail on Wipers
- 1.8% fail on Washers (51% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.30% fail on
View to rear
- 0.30% fail on Mirrors
- 0.20% fail on Bonnet
-
0.098% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.098% fail on Windscreen
-
6.8% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 3.1% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.4% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(110% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Chassis
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.98% fail on Chassis condition (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.098% fail on Strengthening plate
-
1.1% fail on
Transmission
(70% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.98% fail on
Drive shafts
(71% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.98% fail on Joints (70% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.098% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.098% fail on Joints
-
0.98% fail on
Drive shafts
(71% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Bumpers
-
0.30% fail on
Doors
-
0.30% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.30% fail on Door condition
-
0.30% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
0.098% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.098% fail on Hose
- 0.098% fail on Floor
-
4.5% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(33% better than other 2005 cars)
-
4.5% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
4.4% fail on
Spark ignition
- 2.3% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 1.9% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.59% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.20% fail on
Compression ignition
(86% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
4.4% fail on
Spark ignition
-
4.5% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
4.3% fail on
Tyres
(33% better than other 2005 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Tread depth
- 1.9% fail on Condition
- 0.20% fail on Size/type
-
3.6% fail on
Steering
-
2.3% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 2.1% fail on Track rod end
- 0.098% fail on Ball joint
- 0.098% fail on Locking devices
- 0.69% fail on Electronic power steering (9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.39% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.39% fail on Steering rack
-
0.30% fail on
Power steering
- 0.30% fail on Operation
- 0.098% fail on Steering column
-
0.098% fail on
Steering play
- 0.098% fail on Steering rack
-
2.3% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
2.6% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
1.3% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.79% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.49% fail on Condition
- 1.3% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
1.3% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.79% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.79% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review
-
Daihatsu Sirion (2005 - 2009)
Decent small hatchback based on a Toyota Yaris. Reliable and robust. Strong 1.3 engine. Good value for money.