Daihatsu Sirion MOT Results

Registered in 2004
63.6% pass rate
from 250 tests in 2017
(23% better than other 2004 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 cars and highlighted areas where the Daihatsu Sirion is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (37% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.6% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.40% fail on Rear lamps
    • 5.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.8% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 0.80% fail on Battery
    • 0.80% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.80% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.40% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.80% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.80% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.80% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.40% fail on Individual lamps
  • 11% fail on Brakes
    • 5.2% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.4% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.2% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.80% fail on Rear wheels (78% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.40% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 3.6% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 2.8% fail on Components
        • 2.8% fail on Pipes
      • 0.80% fail on Operation (8 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Hub components
      • 1.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.40% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.40% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.2% fail on Service brake control components (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Pedal (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Condition (16 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.40% fail on Lever
    • 0.40% fail on Restricted movement
  • 10% fail on Suspension (48% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 8.0% fail on Prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 6.4% fail on Component mounting (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Spring mounting (14 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 1.2% fail on Coil springs (75% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Condition (83% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Location
    • 0.80% fail on Suspension arms (82% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (81% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.40% fail on Condition
    • 0.40% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.40% fail on Rear
    • 0.40% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.40% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.40% fail on Condition
  • 6.0% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.4% fail on Wipers
    • 1.6% fail on Washers
    • 0.40% fail on Mirrors
  • 5.6% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 4.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.2% fail on Emissions
    • 0.40% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.40% fail on Cap
    • 0.40% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 4.4% fail on Tyres (51% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.40% fail on Valve stem
  • 2.8% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.6% fail on Body condition
    • 0.40% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.40% fail on Chassis
    • 0.40% fail on Doors
      • 0.40% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.40% fail on Load security
      • 0.40% fail on Tailgate
  • 2.0% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 2.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.0% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 0.80% fail on Steering (84% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.80% fail on Steering system (82% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Track rod end
  • 0.40% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.40% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages