Daihatsu Sirion MOT Results

Registered in 2003
58.9% pass rate
from 299 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Daihatsu Sirion is unusually good or bad.

  • 14% fail on Suspension
    • 10% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Suspension arms (68% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.33% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.33% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.3% fail on Springs
      • 0.67% fail on Coil springs (81% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.67% fail on Coil spring (81% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (12 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.67% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.33% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.67% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.67% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.33% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.33% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.33% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.33% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.33% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (34% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 6.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.0% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.0% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.7% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.33% fail on All position lamps
    • 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim (72% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim (70% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.0% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.67% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.67% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.33% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.33% fail on Horn
  • 12% fail on Brakes
    • 5.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 5.0% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.0% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.7% fail on Rbt
          • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.33% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.33% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 2.0% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.0% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.67% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.33% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.33% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (76% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 1.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (75% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.33% fail on Rbt
          • 0.33% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 3.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.0% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.3% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.3% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.0% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 1.0% fail on Pedal
    • 0.67% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.67% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.33% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.33% fail on Servos
    • 0.33% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.33% fail on Lever
  • 12% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 7.7% fail on Exhaust system (100% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Chassis (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Chassis condition (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.67% fail on Transmission (82% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Drive shafts (81% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.67% fail on Joints (81% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Body
      • 0.33% fail on Other body component
  • 10% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 9.7% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 9.7% fail on Spark ignition
        • 5.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 3.7% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 2.0% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.33% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.33% fail on Oxygen sensor
    • 0.33% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.33% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 6.4% fail on Visibility
    • 4.3% fail on Wipers
    • 2.3% fail on Washers
    • 0.67% fail on View to rear
      • 0.67% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.33% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.33% fail on Windscreen
  • 5.4% fail on Tyres
    • 4.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.7% fail on Condition
  • 2.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.7% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.33% fail on Condition
    • 0.33% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 1.7% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.7% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.67% fail on Steering (86% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.67% fail on Steering linkage components (82% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Track rod end (80% better than other 2003 cars)
  • 0.33% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.33% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages