Daihatsu Sirion MOT Results

Registered in 2000
46.9% pass rate
from 209 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Daihatsu Sirion is unusually good or bad.

  • 27% fail on Suspension
    • 14% fail on Prescribed areas (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 10% fail on Component mounting (150% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Spring mounting (8 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 12% fail on Drive shafts (190% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 12% fail on Front drive shafts (190% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 12% fail on Constant velocity joints (200% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.9% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.4% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.4% fail on Condition
    • 0.48% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.48% fail on Condition
    • 0.48% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.48% fail on Condition
  • 18% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 5.7% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 5.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.8% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.48% fail on Rear lamps
    • 2.9% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.4% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.96% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.48% fail on All direction indicators
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.9% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 0.96% fail on Battery
    • 0.96% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.96% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.48% fail on Horn
  • 13% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 7.7% fail on Emissions
    • 6.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.4% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.48% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.48% fail on Cap
  • 12% fail on Brakes
    • 8.1% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.2% fail on Front wheels
      • 3.3% fail on Rear wheels
      • 2.4% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.96% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.48% fail on Service brake performance
    • 4.8% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 4.8% fail on Components
        • 4.3% fail on Pipes
        • 0.48% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.48% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 1.4% fail on Hub components
      • 1.4% fail on Brake pads
    • 0.48% fail on ABS
    • 0.48% fail on Restricted movement
  • 9.1% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.7% fail on Wipers
    • 2.4% fail on Mirrors (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Washers
    • 0.48% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.48% fail on Windscreen
  • 8.1% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 8.1% fail on Seat belts (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 8.1% fail on Prescribed areas (190% worse than other 2000 cars)
  • 6.7% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 4.8% fail on Body condition (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.9% fail on Chassis
  • 6.2% fail on Tyres
    • 3.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.9% fail on Condition
    • 0.48% fail on Size/type
  • 1.4% fail on Steering
    • 1.4% fail on Steering system
      • 0.96% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.48% fail on Ball joint
  • 1.4% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plate
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages