Daihatsu Sirion MOT Results

Registered in 1999
50.2% pass rate
from 237 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Daihatsu Sirion is unusually good or bad.

  • 31% fail on Suspension (43% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 20% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 14% fail on Component mounting (200% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 8.4% fail on Spring mounting (19 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 14% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 13% fail on Front drive shafts (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 13% fail on Constant velocity joints (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.42% fail on Drive shafts
    • 3.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.7% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.3% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.3% fail on Rear
    • 0.84% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.84% fail on Condition
    • 0.42% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.42% fail on Condition
  • 17% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 6.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.5% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.3% fail on Rear lamps
    • 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 3.0% fail on Fog lamp
    • 1.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.7% fail on Individual lamps
    • 1.3% fail on Battery
    • 1.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.84% fail on Registration plate lamp (85% better than other 1999 cars)
  • 15% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 7.6% fail on Emissions
    • 5.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.7% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.3% fail on Cap
      • 0.42% fail on Pipe
    • 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 13% fail on Brakes
    • 8.0% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.1% fail on Front wheels
      • 3.4% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.3% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
    • 3.4% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 3.4% fail on Components
        • 2.5% fail on Pipes
        • 0.42% fail on Cylinders
        • 0.42% fail on Hoses
    • 2.1% fail on Hub components
      • 1.7% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.84% fail on Brake discs
  • 9.7% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.8% fail on Wipers
    • 1.3% fail on Washers
    • 0.84% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.42% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.42% fail on Windscreen
  • 7.6% fail on Tyres
    • 5.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.5% fail on Condition
  • 7.6% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 7.6% fail on Seat belts (99% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Prescribed areas (100% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.84% fail on Condition
      • 0.42% fail on Requirements
  • 5.5% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 3.4% fail on Body condition
    • 2.1% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 2.1% fail on Chassis
    • 1.3% fail on Engine mountings (12 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  • 2.1% fail on Steering
    • 1.3% fail on Steering system
      • 0.42% fail on Free play
        • 0.42% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.42% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.42% fail on Track rod end
    • 1.3% fail on Power steering
      • 0.84% fail on Operation
      • 0.84% fail on Other components
  • 0.42% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.42% fail on Registration plate

Search Good Garages