Daihatsu Fourtrak MOT Results

Registered in 2000
55.4% pass rate
from 276 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Daihatsu Fourtrak is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 8.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 6.5% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 6.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 6.2% fail on Fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.6% fail on Rear lamps
      • 1.8% fail on Front lamps
    • 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.2% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.36% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.36% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.36% fail on Switch
    • 1.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.1% fail on Horn
    • 0.36% fail on Battery
    • 0.36% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.36% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 22% fail on Suspension
    • 8.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.9% fail on Linkage condition (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.4% fail on Attachment (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.36% fail on Condition
    • 8.0% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 5.8% fail on Component mounting
      • 2.5% fail on Spring mounting (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Drive shafts
      • 4.7% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 4.7% fail on Constant velocity joints
      • 0.36% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.36% fail on Drive shafts
    • 4.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.36% fail on Condition
    • 2.9% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 2.9% fail on Condition
    • 2.2% fail on Trailing arms (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.72% fail on Condition (20 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.72% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.36% fail on Condition
      • 0.36% fail on Location
    • 0.72% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.36% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.36% fail on Attachment
    • 0.72% fail on Panhard rods (47 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.36% fail on Attachment
    • 0.72% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.72% fail on Front
    • 0.36% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.36% fail on Condition
    • 0.36% fail on Front suspension joints
  • 14% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (180% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 14% fail on Seat belts (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 13% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Condition
  • 12% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 6.9% fail on Body condition (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Vehicle structure (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.7% fail on Chassis (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.36% fail on Body security
  • 11% fail on Brakes (37% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 5.8% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 5.1% fail on Components
        • 5.1% fail on Pipes
      • 0.36% fail on Operation
      • 0.36% fail on Leaks
    • 4.7% fail on Brake performance (48% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.8% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.72% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.72% fail on Parking brake performance (83% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.36% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.72% fail on Hub components
      • 0.36% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.36% fail on Brake back plates
    • 0.36% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.36% fail on Condition
    • 0.36% fail on Restricted movement
  • 10% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 5.8% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.9% fail on Fuel system (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Pipe (13 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.72% fail on Tank
      • 0.36% fail on Cap
    • 2.2% fail on Emissions (66% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 7.6% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.4% fail on Wipers
    • 1.8% fail on Washers
    • 0.36% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.36% fail on Mirrors
  • 6.9% fail on Steering
    • 6.5% fail on Steering system
      • 2.9% fail on Track rod end
      • 2.2% fail on Other components (58 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 2.2% fail on Steering pivot point (73 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.72% fail on Free play (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.72% fail on Steering box (65 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.72% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.36% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.36% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.36% fail on Steering operation
  • 2.9% fail on Tyres (66% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Tread depth (64% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Condition
  • 1.4% fail on Towbars (8 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Vehicle structure (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.72% fail on Towbar (45 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  • 1.1% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.36% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.36% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages