MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Daihatsu » Fourtrak » 2000

Daihatsu Fourtrak MOT Results

Registered in 2000
58.7% pass rate
from 172 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Daihatsu Fourtrak is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 7.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 5.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 4.7% fail on Individual direction indicators (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.58% fail on Switch
    • 3.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.5% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.9% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 2.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 2.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 2.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.7% fail on Position lamps (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Position lamp (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.58% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.58% fail on Horn
    • 0.58% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 18% fail on Suspension
    • 6.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.5% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 2.3% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.58% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 5.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.3% fail on Pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (19 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.58% fail on Anti-roll bar
    • 5.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 4.7% fail on Springs
      • 2.9% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (22 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Coil springs
        • 1.7% fail on Mounting (33 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.2% fail on Axles
      • 1.2% fail on Axle (40 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.58% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 15% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Chassis (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Chassis condition (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Transmission
      • 2.3% fail on Drive shafts
        • 2.3% fail on Joints
      • 1.2% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.58% fail on Prop shaft
        • 0.58% fail on Joints
    • 2.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.7% fail on Body (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Other body component (8 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Mounting fixings
    • 1.2% fail on Bumpers (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.58% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.58% fail on Hose
  • 9.9% fail on Brakes
    • 8.1% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.8% fail on Service brake performance
        • 5.8% fail on Rbt
          • 5.2% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.58% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.58% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.58% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.58% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.58% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.58% fail on Rbt
          • 0.58% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 1.7% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.2% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.2% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.58% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.58% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.2% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 1.2% fail on Pedal
  • 9.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (160% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 9.9% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 9.3% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Attachment
  • 8.1% fail on Steering (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 7.0% fail on Steering linkage components (190% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Drag link end (9 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.7% fail on Intermediate drop arm (90 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Other components
        • 0.58% fail on Steering linkage
    • 1.2% fail on Power steering
      • 1.2% fail on Operation (8 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Other components
  • 6.4% fail on Visibility
    • 4.1% fail on Wipers
    • 1.7% fail on Washers
    • 0.58% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.58% fail on Windscreen
  • 2.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (66% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Exhaust emissions (64% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Compression ignition (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 2.9% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (13 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  • 2.9% fail on Tyres
    • 1.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.58% fail on Size/type
    • 0.58% fail on Condition
  • 0.58% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.58% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.58% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.58% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages