Daihatsu Fourtrak MOT Results

Registered in 1999
52.3% pass rate
from 398 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Daihatsu Fourtrak is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Suspension (33% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 8.5% fail on Suspension arms (70% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Ball joint
      • 3.0% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.5% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (19 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 1.0% fail on Suspension arm (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 8.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (59% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 7.5% fail on Anti-roll bars (76% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (14 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.50% fail on Linkage
      • 0.25% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.25% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 2.5% fail on Springs
      • 1.8% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (11 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.75% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.50% fail on Coil spring
        • 0.25% fail on Mounting
    • 2.3% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.3% fail on Other suspension component
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.75% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.50% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.50% fail on Pins and bushes (8 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  • 21% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 7.8% fail on Stop lamp (65% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Direction indicators (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 5.5% fail on Flashing type (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 3.8% fail on Individual direction indicators (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.75% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.25% fail on Switch
    • 3.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.8% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.5% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.5% fail on Position lamp
    • 3.3% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 3.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.25% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.3% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.3% fail on Horn
      • 1.0% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.25% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.50% fail on Rear reflectors (9 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.25% fail on Switch
  • 20% fail on Body, chassis, structure (79% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 7.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 7.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Exhaust system
    • 4.5% fail on Transmission
      • 4.0% fail on Drive shafts
        • 4.0% fail on Joints
      • 0.50% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.50% fail on Joints
    • 4.3% fail on Chassis (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Chassis condition (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.0% fail on Pipe (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Tank
      • 0.25% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 1.0% fail on Body
      • 0.75% fail on Other body component
      • 0.25% fail on Mounting fixings
      • 0.25% fail on Panel
    • 0.75% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.75% fail on Towbar
      • 0.50% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.25% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.50% fail on Seats
      • 0.50% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.50% fail on Cabs (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Floor
    • 0.25% fail on Undertray
  • 12% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 12% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 11% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.75% fail on Condition
      • 0.25% fail on Attachment
  • 8.3% fail on Steering (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 6.5% fail on Steering linkage components (160% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Intermediate drop arm (96 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.25% fail on Locking devices
    • 1.0% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.0% fail on Steering box (18 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.75% fail on Steering play (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.75% fail on Steering box (32 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.50% fail on Power steering
      • 0.25% fail on Operation
      • 0.25% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.25% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 7.3% fail on Brakes (49% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Brake performance (44% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.8% fail on Rbt
          • 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.75% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.5% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 2.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 2.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.75% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.50% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (87% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.50% fail on Rbt (sp) (87% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.8% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Pedal (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.25% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.25% fail on Lever
    • 0.25% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.25% fail on Master cylinder
    • 0.25% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.25% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.25% fail on Brake pads
  • 5.8% fail on Visibility
    • 3.8% fail on Wipers
    • 2.3% fail on Washers
    • 0.25% fail on Bonnet
  • 3.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (61% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Exhaust emissions (67% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Compression ignition (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.50% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.25% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.25% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
      • 0.50% fail on Spark ignition (94% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.50% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.25% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 1.5% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.0% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.50% fail on Other leaks
  • 2.5% fail on Tyres (56% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Condition
    • 1.0% fail on Tread depth (71% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.50% fail on Size/type
  • 0.75% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.50% fail on Attachment
    • 0.25% fail on Condition
  • 0.50% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.50% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages