Daihatsu Fourtrak MOT Results

Registered in 1999
57.2% pass rate
from 304 tests in 2021
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Daihatsu Fourtrak is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Body, chassis, structure (100% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 7.6% fail on Transmission (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 6.6% fail on Drive shafts (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 6.6% fail on Joints (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.99% fail on Prop shafts (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.66% fail on Joints
        • 0.33% fail on Prop shaft
    • 6.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 6.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.0% fail on Chassis (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Chassis condition (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.99% fail on Cabs (7 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.99% fail on Prescribed areas (7 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.66% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.33% fail on Tank
      • 0.33% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.66% fail on Body
      • 0.33% fail on Mounting fixings
      • 0.33% fail on Panel
    • 0.66% fail on Seats
      • 0.33% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.33% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.33% fail on Bumpers
  • 19% fail on Suspension
    • 8.9% fail on Anti-roll bars (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Pins and bushes (7 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (17 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.99% fail on Linkage
      • 0.99% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting (28 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Anti-roll bar
    • 5.9% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 4.9% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.3% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.6% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.99% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.33% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.33% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 2.3% fail on Other suspension component (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.99% fail on Ball joint dust cover (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (16 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.33% fail on Ball joint
    • 2.0% fail on Springs
      • 0.99% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.99% fail on Mounting (22 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.99% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.66% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.66% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (58 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.33% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.33% fail on Sub-frame
  • 18% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 5.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 5.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.6% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.0% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.99% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.66% fail on Horn
      • 0.33% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.99% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.99% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.99% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.33% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.33% fail on Switch
  • 12% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 12% fail on Seat belts (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 12% fail on Prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Condition
  • 9.9% fail on Brakes
    • 7.2% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 3.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 2.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 2.3% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.33% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 3.9% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.6% fail on Rbt
          • 3.3% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.33% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.33% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.33% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.99% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.66% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.66% fail on Rbt
          • 0.66% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.66% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (80% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.33% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.33% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
    • 2.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.66% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.66% fail on Pedal
    • 0.33% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.33% fail on Lever
    • 0.33% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.33% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.33% fail on Brake pads
  • 6.3% fail on Steering
    • 4.3% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.3% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.99% fail on Intermediate drop arm (43 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.33% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.33% fail on Other components
        • 0.33% fail on Steering linkage
      • 0.33% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.99% fail on Power steering
      • 0.99% fail on Operation (8 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.99% fail on Steering play (7 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.99% fail on Steering box (33 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  • 4.6% fail on Visibility
    • 2.6% fail on Wipers
    • 1.6% fail on Washers
    • 0.33% fail on View to rear
      • 0.33% fail on Mirrors
  • 3.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (60% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Exhaust emissions (62% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Compression ignition (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Emissions not tested (10 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.99% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.33% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    • 0.33% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.33% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 1.3% fail on Tyres (69% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.66% fail on Condition
    • 0.66% fail on Tread depth
  • 0.99% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.99% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.99% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.99% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages