MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Daihatsu » Fourtrak » 1996

Daihatsu Fourtrak MOT Results

Registered in 1996
53.2% pass rate
from 278 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 cars and highlighted areas where the Daihatsu Fourtrak is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 7.9% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.0% fail on Rear lamps (190% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Front lamps
    • 7.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (180% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 7.6% fail on Fog lamp (200% worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 7.2% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 6.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.6% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.6% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.2% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.72% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.36% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.36% fail on Switch
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.2% fail on Battery
    • 1.1% fail on Horn
    • 0.36% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.36% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.36% fail on Switch
  • 23% fail on Suspension
    • 9.7% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 7.6% fail on Component mounting
      • 4.3% fail on Spring mounting (6 times worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 7.2% fail on Anti-roll bars (140% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 2.9% fail on Linkage condition (9 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Attachment (5 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.72% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.36% fail on Presence
    • 4.0% fail on Drive shafts
      • 4.0% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 4.0% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 3.2% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 3.2% fail on Condition
    • 2.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.36% fail on Condition
    • 1.4% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.4% fail on Front
    • 1.1% fail on Panhard rods (15 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Attachment (57 times worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.72% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.36% fail on Condition
      • 0.36% fail on Location
    • 0.72% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.72% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.72% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.72% fail on Attachment (37 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.36% fail on General condition
    • 0.36% fail on Axles
      • 0.36% fail on Axle beam
  • 15% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (170% worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 15% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 14% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Attachment (15 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Condition
  • 15% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (170% worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 10% fail on Body condition (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Vehicle structure (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 5.4% fail on Chassis (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 0.72% fail on Seats
      • 0.72% fail on Passengers
    • 0.36% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.36% fail on Doors
      • 0.36% fail on Passengers front
  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 7.2% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.0% fail on Front wheels
      • 3.6% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.8% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 1.8% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.72% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.36% fail on Brake operation
    • 5.0% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 4.7% fail on Components
        • 4.3% fail on Pipes
        • 0.36% fail on Hoses
      • 0.36% fail on Leaks
    • 1.8% fail on Hub components
      • 1.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.36% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.1% fail on Service brake control components
      • 1.1% fail on Pedal
        • 1.1% fail on Anti-slip (5 times worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 0.72% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.72% fail on Condition
    • 0.36% fail on Restricted movement
  • 9.4% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 6.8% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.2% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.1% fail on Pipe (3 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Cap
      • 0.36% fail on Tank
    • 0.72% fail on Emissions (88% better than other 1996 cars)
  • 5.4% fail on Steering
    • 4.7% fail on Steering system
      • 1.8% fail on Other components (21 times worse than other 1996 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Steering pivot point (25 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.72% fail on Intermediate drop arm (35 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.72% fail on Steering arm (6 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Free play
        • 0.36% fail on Steering box
      • 0.36% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.36% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.36% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.36% fail on Power steering
      • 0.36% fail on Operation
    • 0.36% fail on Locking devices
  • 5.4% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 2.5% fail on Wipers
    • 2.5% fail on Washers
    • 0.72% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.36% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.0% fail on Tyres
    • 2.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.36% fail on Size/type
  • 2.5% fail on Towbars (6 times worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Vehicle structure (3 times worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Towbar (27 times worse than other 1996 cars)
  • 1.4% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plate
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages