Daihatsu Fourtrak MOT Results
Registered in 199554.6% pass rate
from 194 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Daihatsu Fourtrak is unusually good or bad.
-
27% fail on
Suspension
(57% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
12% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 6.2% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 2.1% fail on Attachment (8 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Linkage condition (6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Presence
-
8.2% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 5.2% fail on Component mounting
- 2.6% fail on Spring mounting (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Subframe mounting
-
6.7% fail on
Drive shafts
(120% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
6.2% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 6.2% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
0.52% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.52% fail on Drive shafts
-
6.2% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
4.6% fail on
Wheel bearings
(170% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 4.6% fail on Front (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
3.6% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.52% fail on Condition
- 0.52% fail on Attachment
-
3.6% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 3.6% fail on Condition
-
2.1% fail on
Coil springs
- 1.5% fail on Condition
- 0.52% fail on Location
- 2.1% fail on Front suspension joints
-
1.5% fail on
Trailing arms
(4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.52% fail on Condition
-
0.52% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.52% fail on Attachment
-
12% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
24% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 6.2% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
5.2% fail on
Position lamps
- 3.1% fail on Front lamps
- 2.1% fail on Rear lamps
- 5.2% fail on Stop lamp
-
5.2% fail on
Direction indicators
-
5.2% fail on
Flashing type
- 3.6% fail on Individual lamps
- 1.5% fail on All direction indicators
-
5.2% fail on
Flashing type
- 5.2% fail on Headlamp aim
-
4.1% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 3.6% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.52% fail on Tell tale
-
3.1% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.1% fail on Headlamp
- 1.5% fail on Battery
- 1.5% fail on Horn
- 1.0% fail on Trailer electrical socket (10 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.52% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.52% fail on Lamp
-
17% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
17% fail on
Seat belts
(2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 16% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Requirements
-
17% fail on
Seat belts
(2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
15% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(180% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 12% fail on Body condition (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
4.6% fail on
Vehicle structure
(160% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 4.6% fail on Chassis (160% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Seats
- 0.52% fail on Passengers
- 0.52% fail on Drivers
-
0.52% fail on
Doors
- 0.52% fail on Passengers front
-
13% fail on
Brakes
-
5.7% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
5.2% fail on
Components
- 4.6% fail on Pipes
- 0.52% fail on Hoses
- 0.52% fail on Leaks
-
5.2% fail on
Components
-
5.7% fail on
Brake performance
- 3.6% fail on Front wheels
- 2.1% fail on Rear wheels
- 1.5% fail on Brake imbalance
- 1.0% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.52% fail on Service brake performance
-
2.6% fail on
Service brake control components
(7 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Pedal
(7 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Anti-slip (15 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Pedal
(7 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Hub components
- 1.0% fail on Brake pads
- 0.52% fail on Restricted movement
-
5.7% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
9.8% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 6.2% fail on Exhaust system
-
4.1% fail on
Fuel system
(2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Cap (9 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Tank (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Pipe
- 1.5% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.52% fail on Emissions
-
9.3% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 5.7% fail on Wipers
- 4.1% fail on Washers
- 1.0% fail on Windscreen
- 0.52% fail on Bonnet
-
5.2% fail on
Steering
-
4.6% fail on
Steering system
- 1.5% fail on Track rod end
- 1.5% fail on Steering arm (13 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Other components
(10 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Steering pivot point
- 0.52% fail on Steering linkage
- 0.52% fail on Intermediate drop arm
- 0.52% fail on Ball joint
-
0.52% fail on
Power steering
- 0.52% fail on Drive system
-
4.6% fail on
Steering system
-
4.1% fail on
Towbars
(9 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Vehicle structure (6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Towbar (24 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
4.1% fail on
Tyres
- 2.6% fail on Tread depth
- 1.5% fail on Condition
- 1.0% fail on Size/type
-
1.0% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.0% fail on Registration plate
-
0.52% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.52% fail on Attachment