MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Daihatsu » Fourtrak » 1995

Daihatsu Fourtrak MOT Results

Registered in 1995
54.6% pass rate
from 194 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Daihatsu Fourtrak is unusually good or bad.

  • 27% fail on Suspension (57% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 12% fail on Anti-roll bars (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 6.2% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 2.1% fail on Attachment (8 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Linkage condition (6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Presence
    • 8.2% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 5.2% fail on Component mounting
      • 2.6% fail on Spring mounting (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 6.7% fail on Drive shafts (120% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 6.2% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 6.2% fail on Constant velocity joints
      • 0.52% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.52% fail on Drive shafts
    • 4.6% fail on Wheel bearings (170% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 4.6% fail on Front (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.52% fail on Condition
      • 0.52% fail on Attachment
    • 3.6% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 3.6% fail on Condition
    • 2.1% fail on Coil springs
      • 1.5% fail on Condition
      • 0.52% fail on Location
    • 2.1% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.5% fail on Trailing arms (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.52% fail on Condition
    • 0.52% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.52% fail on Attachment
  • 24% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 6.2% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 5.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.1% fail on Front lamps
      • 2.1% fail on Rear lamps
    • 5.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 5.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.6% fail on Individual lamps
        • 1.5% fail on All direction indicators
    • 5.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 3.6% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.52% fail on Tell tale
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.5% fail on Battery
    • 1.5% fail on Horn
    • 1.0% fail on Trailer electrical socket (10 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.52% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.52% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.52% fail on Lamp
  • 17% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 17% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 16% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Requirements
  • 15% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (180% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 12% fail on Body condition (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Vehicle structure (160% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 4.6% fail on Chassis (160% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Seats
      • 0.52% fail on Passengers
      • 0.52% fail on Drivers
    • 0.52% fail on Doors
      • 0.52% fail on Passengers front
  • 13% fail on Brakes
    • 5.7% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 5.2% fail on Components
        • 4.6% fail on Pipes
        • 0.52% fail on Hoses
      • 0.52% fail on Leaks
    • 5.7% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.6% fail on Front wheels
      • 2.1% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.5% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 1.0% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.52% fail on Service brake performance
    • 2.6% fail on Service brake control components (7 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Pedal (7 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 2.6% fail on Anti-slip (15 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Hub components
      • 1.0% fail on Brake pads
    • 0.52% fail on Restricted movement
  • 9.8% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 6.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 4.1% fail on Fuel system (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Cap (9 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Tank (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Pipe
    • 1.5% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.52% fail on Emissions
  • 9.3% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.7% fail on Wipers
    • 4.1% fail on Washers
    • 1.0% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.52% fail on Bonnet
  • 5.2% fail on Steering
    • 4.6% fail on Steering system
      • 1.5% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.5% fail on Steering arm (13 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Other components (10 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.52% fail on Steering pivot point
        • 0.52% fail on Steering linkage
      • 0.52% fail on Intermediate drop arm
      • 0.52% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.52% fail on Power steering
      • 0.52% fail on Drive system
  • 4.1% fail on Towbars (9 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Vehicle structure (6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Towbar (24 times worse than other 1995 cars)
  • 4.1% fail on Tyres
    • 2.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.5% fail on Condition
    • 1.0% fail on Size/type
  • 1.0% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.0% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.52% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.52% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages