Daihatsu Fourtrak MOT Results

Registered in 1994
63.7% pass rate
from 204 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1994 cars and highlighted areas where the Daihatsu Fourtrak is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Suspension
    • 7.8% fail on Anti-roll bars (190% worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (160% worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Linkage condition (6 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Attachment (6 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 6.9% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 4.4% fail on Component mounting
      • 2.9% fail on Spring mounting (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 4.9% fail on Shock absorbers (150% worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 4.9% fail on Condition (150% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.49% fail on Condition
    • 4.4% fail on Drive shafts
      • 4.4% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 4.4% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 2.9% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 2.9% fail on Front (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Trailing arms (8 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (11 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Panhard rods (23 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (21 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Attachment
    • 1.5% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.98% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.98% fail on Attachment (19 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 0.49% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.49% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.49% fail on Torque/reaction arms
      • 0.49% fail on Attachment
  • 19% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 6.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.9% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.9% fail on Front lamps
      • 2.9% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.49% fail on All position lamps
    • 4.9% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 3.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.9% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.98% fail on All direction indicators
    • 2.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 2.9% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.49% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.98% fail on Horn
    • 0.49% fail on Battery
    • 0.49% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.49% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.49% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 14% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (180% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 14% fail on Seat belts (200% worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 13% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Requirements
      • 0.49% fail on Condition
      • 0.49% fail on Attachment
  • 14% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (140% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 9.8% fail on Body condition (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 3.4% fail on Chassis
    • 0.98% fail on Seats
      • 0.49% fail on Passengers
      • 0.49% fail on Drivers
  • 10% fail on Brakes
    • 6.4% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.4% fail on Front wheels
      • 2.5% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.98% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.49% fail on Parking brake operation
      • 0.49% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 2.9% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 2.9% fail on Components
        • 2.9% fail on Pipes
    • 2.0% fail on Service brake control components (5 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Pedal (5 times worse than other 1994 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Anti-slip (7 times worse than other 1994 cars)
        • 0.49% fail on Condition
    • 0.49% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.49% fail on Condition
    • 0.49% fail on Hub components
      • 0.49% fail on Brake pads
  • 7.8% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 5.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.5% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.98% fail on System
      • 0.49% fail on Pipe
    • 0.98% fail on Emissions (82% better than other 1994 cars)
    • 0.98% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 5.9% fail on Steering
    • 3.9% fail on Steering system
      • 2.5% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.98% fail on Intermediate drop arm (16 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Free play
        • 0.49% fail on Steering box
      • 0.49% fail on Steering box
    • 0.98% fail on Steering control
      • 0.98% fail on Steering lock (50 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 0.98% fail on Power steering
      • 0.98% fail on Operation (5 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Pump
    • 0.98% fail on Locking devices (8 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 0.49% fail on Steering operation
  • 5.4% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 3.9% fail on Wipers
    • 1.5% fail on Washers
    • 0.49% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.49% fail on Windscreen
  • 3.4% fail on Tyres
    • 2.0% fail on Condition
    • 1.5% fail on Tread depth
  • 2.0% fail on Towbars (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Towbar (25 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 0.49% fail on Vehicle structure
  • 1.5% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plate

Search Good Garages