Daihatsu Charade MOT Results

Registered in 2005
64.4% pass rate
from 522 tests in 2020
(22% better than other 2005 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Daihatsu Charade is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Suspension
    • 8.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 6.5% fail on Ball joint (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.77% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 5.9% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Springs (64% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.96% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (36 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Coil springs (86% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.57% fail on Coil spring (86% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.96% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.96% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.57% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.57% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.19% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.19% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.19% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.19% fail on Axles
      • 0.19% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.19% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.19% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.19% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.19% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 10% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (48% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 10% fail on Exhaust emissions (54% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 10% fail on Spark ignition (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 6.5% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 3.1% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.77% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.19% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.19% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 10% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.5% fail on Transmission
      • 2.1% fail on Drive shafts
        • 2.1% fail on Joints
      • 0.38% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.38% fail on Joints
    • 1.9% fail on Fuel system (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Tank (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Hose (29 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Pipe
    • 1.3% fail on Chassis (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Chassis condition (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.96% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.96% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.19% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.19% fail on Doors
      • 0.19% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.19% fail on Door condition
  • 8.0% fail on Brakes (41% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Brake performance (52% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.3% fail on Rbt
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.96% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.77% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.77% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.57% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.38% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.38% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.38% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (91% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.38% fail on Rbt (sp) (90% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.7% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.1% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.77% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.77% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.57% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.57% fail on Pedal
    • 0.57% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (13 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Prescribed areas (34 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.57% fail on Other braking system component (80 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.19% fail on Leaks
    • 0.19% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.19% fail on Valves
    • 0.19% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.19% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 7.1% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (63% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim (55% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.5% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.5% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.1% fail on Headlamps (78% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp (77% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.57% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.57% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.19% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.19% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.19% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.19% fail on Side repeaters
  • 6.5% fail on Visibility
    • 4.6% fail on Wipers
    • 1.3% fail on Washers (62% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.38% fail on View to rear
      • 0.38% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.19% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.19% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.19% fail on Windscreen
  • 4.6% fail on Tyres
    • 3.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.1% fail on Condition (63% better than other 2005 cars)
  • 1.5% fail on Steering (63% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.77% fail on Track rod end (73% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.19% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.19% fail on Power steering
      • 0.19% fail on Operation
  • 1.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.96% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.38% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.38% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 0.38% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.38% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages