Daewoo Tacuma MOT Results
Registered in 200450.0% pass rate
from 98 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 cars and highlighted areas where the Daewoo Tacuma is unusually good or bad.
-
23% fail on
Brakes
(69% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 14% fail on Rigid brake pipes (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
9.2% fail on
Brake performance
-
7.1% fail on
Service brake performance
-
7.1% fail on
Rbt
- 7.1% fail on Service brake performance (190% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
7.1% fail on
Rbt
-
3.1% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 3.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
2.0% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
2.0% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 2.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 1.0% fail on Service brake performance
-
2.0% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
7.1% fail on
Service brake performance
-
5.1% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 5.1% fail on Anti-lock braking system (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.0% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.0% fail on Brake pads
-
1.0% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.0% fail on Brake discs
-
1.0% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
18% fail on
Suspension
- 7.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
5.1% fail on
Springs
-
4.1% fail on
Coil springs
- 4.1% fail on Coil spring
- 1.0% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
4.1% fail on
Coil springs
-
5.1% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 2.0% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 1.0% fail on Pins and bushes
- 1.0% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 1.0% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
2.0% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.0% fail on Pins and bushes
- 1.0% fail on Wheel bearings
- 1.0% fail on Shock absorbers
-
12% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
12% fail on
Seat belts
(6 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 11% fail on Prescribed areas (10 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Requirements
- 1.0% fail on Condition
-
12% fail on
Seat belts
(6 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
11% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
6.1% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(6 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 6.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (6 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Exhaust system
-
2.0% fail on
Chassis
- 2.0% fail on Chassis condition
-
1.0% fail on
Transmission
-
1.0% fail on
Drive shafts
- 1.0% fail on Joints
-
1.0% fail on
Drive shafts
-
6.1% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(6 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
10% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
10% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
10% fail on
Spark ignition
- 6.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 4.1% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 3.1% fail on Emissions not tested
-
1.0% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 1.0% fail on Catalytic converter
-
10% fail on
Spark ignition
-
10% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
8.2% fail on
Visibility
- 6.1% fail on Washers
- 2.0% fail on Wipers
-
4.1% fail on
Tyres
- 3.1% fail on Tread depth
- 2.0% fail on Condition
-
2.0% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(88% better than other 2004 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Stop lamp
-
1.0% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.0% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.0% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
1.0% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.0% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.0% fail on Registration plates