Daewoo Tacuma MOT Results

Registered in 2004
46.8% pass rate
from 269 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 cars and highlighted areas where the Daewoo Tacuma is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Suspension
    • 10% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 5.9% fail on Linkage ball joints (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.1% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.74% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.74% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.37% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 6.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.1% fail on Ball joint
      • 2.2% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 5.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (190% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Springs
      • 1.1% fail on Coil springs
        • 1.1% fail on Coil spring
    • 1.1% fail on Macpherson strut (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Macpherson strut (17 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.74% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.74% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.37% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.37% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.37% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 18% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (130% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 17% fail on Exhaust emissions (120% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 17% fail on Spark ignition (180% worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 14% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 4.1% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.74% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.74% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (6 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Fluid leaks (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Engine oil leaks (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.37% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 17% fail on Brakes
    • 12% fail on Rigid brake pipes (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Brake performance (61% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.2% fail on Rbt
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.5% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.37% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.37% fail on Rbt
          • 0.37% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 2.2% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 2.2% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 1.9% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.5% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.37% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.37% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.74% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.37% fail on Pedal
      • 0.37% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.37% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.37% fail on Leaks
    • 0.37% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.37% fail on Lever
    • 0.37% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.37% fail on Brake fluid
  • 13% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 5.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.0% fail on Chassis (6 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Chassis condition (6 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Transmission
      • 2.2% fail on Drive shafts
        • 2.2% fail on Joints
      • 0.37% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.37% fail on Joints
    • 2.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Body
      • 0.74% fail on Other body component
      • 0.37% fail on Panel
    • 0.37% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.37% fail on Pipe
    • 0.37% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.37% fail on Doors
      • 0.37% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.37% fail on Door condition
  • 12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (41% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.1% fail on Position lamp
    • 3.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.1% fail on Headlamps (80% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp (79% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.74% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.74% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.74% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.74% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.74% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.37% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.37% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.37% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.37% fail on Rear fog lamp
  • 12% fail on Visibility
    • 6.3% fail on Wipers
    • 5.2% fail on Washers
    • 0.37% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.37% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.37% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.37% fail on View to rear
      • 0.37% fail on Mirrors
  • 9.3% fail on Tyres
    • 5.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 4.5% fail on Condition
    • 0.37% fail on Size/type
  • 8.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (180% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 8.9% fail on Seat belts (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 8.2% fail on Prescribed areas (7 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Condition
  • 2.2% fail on Identification of the vehicle (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Registration plates (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
  • 1.9% fail on Steering
    • 1.1% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.1% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.74% fail on Power steering
      • 0.37% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.37% fail on Other components

Search Good Garages