MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Daewoo » Matiz » 2005

Daewoo Matiz MOT Results

Registered in 2005
45.1% pass rate
from 304 tests in 2017
(22% worse than other 2005 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Daewoo Matiz is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 13% fail on Stop lamp (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 7.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 5.9% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.6% fail on Front lamps
      • 2.0% fail on Rear lamps
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.9% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.0% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 0.66% fail on Battery
    • 0.66% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.66% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.33% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.33% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.33% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.33% fail on Horn
  • 21% fail on Suspension
    • 11% fail on Prescribed areas (10 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 11% fail on Component mounting (14 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.3% fail on Wheel bearings (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.9% fail on Rear (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Front
    • 3.9% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.66% fail on Condition
    • 1.6% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.6% fail on Drive shafts
      • 1.6% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 1.6% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 0.99% fail on Trailing arms (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.99% fail on Condition (58 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.33% fail on Condition
    • 0.33% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.33% fail on Condition
    • 0.33% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
    • 0.33% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.33% fail on Condition
  • 18% fail on Brakes
    • 11% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.3% fail on Front wheels (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 5.3% fail on Rear wheels
      • 2.3% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 2.0% fail on Brake imbalance (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Service brake performance
    • 4.9% fail on Hub components
      • 3.9% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.99% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.3% fail on ABS
    • 2.0% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 2.0% fail on Components
        • 1.6% fail on Pipes
        • 0.33% fail on Hoses
    • 1.3% fail on Service brake control components (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Pedal (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Anti-slip (10 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.99% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.99% fail on Condition
    • 0.66% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.33% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.33% fail on Lever
  • 12% fail on Driver's view of the road (53% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.6% fail on Wipers
    • 5.9% fail on Washers (85% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.99% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.33% fail on Bonnet
  • 10% fail on Tyres
    • 6.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.6% fail on Condition
    • 0.99% fail on Size/type
    • 0.33% fail on Valve stem
  • 9.9% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (90% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 8.2% fail on Exhaust system (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Emissions
    • 1.6% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.33% fail on Tank
  • 5.9% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Seat belts (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.6% fail on Prescribed areas (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 1.3% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 4.9% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Body condition (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Vehicle structure (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Chassis (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.66% fail on Doors
      • 0.33% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.33% fail on Passengers other
  • 3.0% fail on Steering
    • 2.3% fail on Steering system
      • 0.99% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.99% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.33% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.33% fail on Steering control
      • 0.33% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.33% fail on Power steering
      • 0.33% fail on Other components
    • 0.33% fail on Locking devices
  • 1.3% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate

Search Good Garages