Daewoo Matiz MOT Results
Registered in 200547.5% pass rate
from 122 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Daewoo Matiz is unusually good or bad.
-
23% fail on
Suspension
- 16% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
6.6% fail on
Suspension arms
- 4.1% fail on Ball joint
- 1.6% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.82% fail on Suspension arm
- 5.7% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.82% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.82% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.82% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
-
1.6% fail on
Axles
(6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.82% fail on Axle
- 0.82% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
-
17% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
8.2% fail on
Headlamps
- 8.2% fail on Headlamp
- 6.6% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.82% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
0.82% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.82% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.82% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
0.82% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.82% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.82% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.82% fail on Battery(ies)
-
8.2% fail on
Headlamps
-
15% fail on
Brakes
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
-
6.6% fail on
Service brake performance
-
5.7% fail on
Rbt
- 4.1% fail on Service brake performance
- 2.5% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.82% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.82% fail on Service brake performance
-
5.7% fail on
Rbt
-
6.6% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
6.6% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 5.7% fail on Service brake imbalance (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.82% fail on Service brake performance
-
6.6% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 2.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
1.6% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.6% fail on
Rbt
- 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance
-
1.6% fail on
Rbt
-
6.6% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.5% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 2.5% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 1.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
0.82% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.82% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
-
12% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
12% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(93% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
12% fail on
Spark ignition
(140% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 6.6% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 5.7% fail on Catalyst emissions
-
12% fail on
Spark ignition
(140% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.82% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.82% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
12% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(93% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
9.8% fail on
Visibility
- 6.6% fail on Wipers
- 3.3% fail on Washers
-
7.4% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 4.9% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.6% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 1.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
1.6% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.82% fail on Tank
- 0.82% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.82% fail on
Chassis
- 0.82% fail on Chassis condition
- 0.82% fail on Bumpers
-
5.7% fail on
Steering
-
4.1% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 4.1% fail on Track rod end
-
1.6% fail on
Steering gear
- 1.6% fail on Steering rack
-
4.1% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
4.9% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
4.9% fail on
Seat belts
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.9% fail on Prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
4.9% fail on
Seat belts
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Tyres
- 2.5% fail on Condition
- 0.82% fail on Tread depth
-
0.82% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.82% fail on Registration plates
-
0.82% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.82% fail on Attachment