Daewoo Matiz MOT Results

Registered in 2003
41.7% pass rate
from 1,482 tests in 2017
(20% worse than other 2003 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Daewoo Matiz is unusually good or bad.

  • 31% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (17% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 11% fail on Headlamp aim (48% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 10% fail on Headlamps (110% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 10% fail on Headlamp (120% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 7.9% fail on Stop lamp (36% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 5.8% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 4.4% fail on Position lamps (39% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Front lamps (42% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Rear lamps
    • 1.0% fail on Battery
    • 0.54% fail on Direction indicators (81% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Flashing type (81% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.27% fail on Individual lamps (84% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.27% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.40% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.34% fail on Rear fog lamp (78% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Fog lamp (77% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.067% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.067% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.067% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 29% fail on Suspension (39% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 14% fail on Prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 13% fail on Component mounting (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Subframe mounting (110% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Spring mounting
    • 8.0% fail on Suspension arms (73% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 7.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (74% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Condition
      • 0.067% fail on Attachment
    • 7.3% fail on Wheel bearings (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 5.7% fail on Rear (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Front (160% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Front suspension joints (120% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Drive shafts (50% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Front drive shafts (49% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Constant velocity joints (49% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.88% fail on Trailing arms (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Condition (26 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.067% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.067% fail on Attachment
    • 0.67% fail on Anti-roll bars (88% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (66% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (95% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Condition
    • 0.20% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.13% fail on Condition
      • 0.067% fail on Attachment
    • 0.20% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices (8 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Shock absorbers (86% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Condition (86% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Torque/reaction arms
      • 0.13% fail on Condition (60 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.067% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.067% fail on Condition
    • 0.067% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.067% fail on Condition
    • 0.067% fail on Panhard rods
      • 0.067% fail on Condition
    • 0.067% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.067% fail on Condition
  • 23% fail on Brakes (41% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 16% fail on Brake performance (100% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 13% fail on Front wheels (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 5.2% fail on Rear wheels (37% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance (56% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance (140% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.0% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 4.7% fail on Components
        • 4.7% fail on Pipes
        • 0.067% fail on Hoses
      • 0.13% fail on Operation
      • 0.13% fail on Leaks
    • 3.0% fail on Hub components
      • 2.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.54% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.13% fail on Brake back plates
      • 0.067% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.067% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 0.81% fail on ABS
    • 0.74% fail on Service brake control components (200% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Pedal (200% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.74% fail on Anti-slip (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.61% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.34% fail on Parking brake (67% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Condition (67% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.067% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.067% fail on Cable
  • 12% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (62% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 8.6% fail on Exhaust system (96% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Emissions (62% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.1% fail on Tank (9 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on System
  • 12% fail on Driver's view of the road (32% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 7.8% fail on Wipers (52% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Washers
    • 0.88% fail on Bonnet (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.13% fail on Mirrors
  • 11% fail on Tyres (26% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 7.2% fail on Tread depth (30% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Condition
    • 0.40% fail on Size/type
    • 0.067% fail on Valve stem
  • 7.3% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (120% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 6.9% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Condition
      • 0.27% fail on Requirements (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.067% fail on Attachment
      • 0.067% fail on Installation check
        • 0.067% fail on Belt(s)/padding
    • 0.40% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (73% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (71% better than other 2003 cars)
  • 5.7% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (160% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Body condition (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Vehicle structure (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Chassis (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Seats (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Drivers (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.067% fail on Passengers
    • 0.20% fail on Body security
    • 0.20% fail on Doors
      • 0.13% fail on Drivers
      • 0.067% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.13% fail on Engine mountings
  • 5.4% fail on Steering
    • 4.9% fail on Steering system
      • 2.8% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.34% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.067% fail on Free play
        • 0.067% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.20% fail on Power steering
      • 0.13% fail on Operation
      • 0.13% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.13% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.067% fail on Steering control
      • 0.067% fail on Steering lock
    • 0.067% fail on Steering operation
  • 1.2% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate
  • 1.0% fail on Road Wheels (110% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.67% fail on Attachment
    • 0.34% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages