Daewoo Matiz MOT Results

Registered in 1999
48.3% pass rate
from 89 tests in 2021
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Daewoo Matiz is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 7.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 7.9% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.2% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 1.1% fail on Switch
    • 2.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.1% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.1% fail on Horn
  • 16% fail on Suspension
    • 7.9% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 4.5% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.2% fail on Ball joint
      • 2.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 3.4% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.4% fail on Pins and bushes (8 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  • 13% fail on Brakes
    • 7.9% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.7% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 6.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 5.6% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
          • 2.2% fail on Service brake performance
      • 3.4% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.4% fail on Rbt
          • 3.4% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 4.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.1% fail on Parking brake control
      • 1.1% fail on Lever
    • 1.1% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 1.1% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 1.1% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.1% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.1% fail on Brake discs
  • 12% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 12% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 12% fail on Spark ignition
        • 11% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.1% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.1% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 9.0% fail on Visibility
    • 9.0% fail on Washers (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Wipers
  • 9.0% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.5% fail on Transmission
      • 4.5% fail on Drive shafts
        • 4.5% fail on Joints
    • 2.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 2.2% fail on Fuel system
      • 2.2% fail on Tank (19 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Exhaust system
  • 9.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 5.6% fail on Seat belts
      • 4.5% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.1% fail on Requirements
    • 3.4% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 6.7% fail on Steering
    • 3.4% fail on Steering gear
      • 3.4% fail on Steering rack
    • 2.2% fail on Power steering
      • 1.1% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 1.1% fail on Other components
    • 1.1% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.1% fail on Track rod end
  • 4.5% fail on Road Wheels (13 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Attachment (13 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Condition
  • 3.4% fail on Tyres
    • 2.2% fail on Condition
    • 1.1% fail on Tread depth
  • 1.1% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages