Daewoo Matiz MOT Results
Registered in 199941.0% pass rate
from 473 tests in 2017
(21% worse than other 1999 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Daewoo Matiz is unusually good or bad.
-
29% fail on
Suspension
(33% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
11% fail on
Prescribed areas
(78% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 9.7% fail on Component mounting (100% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Subframe mounting
-
11% fail on
Drive shafts
(170% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
11% fail on
Front drive shafts
(180% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 11% fail on Constant velocity joints (180% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.21% fail on Drive shafts
-
11% fail on
Front drive shafts
(180% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
6.1% fail on
Wheel bearings
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 5.1% fail on Rear (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Front
-
4.7% fail on
Suspension arms
- 4.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.21% fail on Condition
- 2.3% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.63% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.63% fail on Condition
-
0.42% fail on
Coil springs
(85% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.42% fail on Condition (84% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.42% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.42% fail on Condition (16 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.42% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.42% fail on Condition
-
0.21% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.21% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.21% fail on
Panhard rods
- 0.21% fail on Condition
-
11% fail on
Prescribed areas
(78% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
26% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 11% fail on Headlamp aim (58% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
7.8% fail on
Headlamps
(84% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 7.6% fail on Headlamp (86% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.21% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
- 0.21% fail on Switch
-
4.4% fail on
Position lamps
- 4.0% fail on Front lamps
- 0.63% fail on Rear lamps
- 4.2% fail on Stop lamp
- 3.8% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
1.7% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.7% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.1% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.63% fail on Side repeaters
-
1.7% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.3% fail on Battery
- 1.1% fail on Horn
-
0.63% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.42% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.21% fail on Tell tale
- 0.21% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
23% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(100% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 17% fail on Emissions (160% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 6.1% fail on Exhaust system
-
2.5% fail on
Fuel system
(160% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Tank (10 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.42% fail on Cap
- 0.42% fail on System
- 0.21% fail on Hose
- 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested
-
22% fail on
Brakes
(26% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
13% fail on
Brake performance
(40% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 9.9% fail on Front wheels (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 4.7% fail on Rear wheels
- 2.7% fail on Parking brake performance
- 2.3% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.9% fail on Brake imbalance (190% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.42% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
9.3% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
8.7% fail on
Components
- 8.0% fail on Pipes (93% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.63% fail on Hoses
- 0.21% fail on Cylinders
- 0.21% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.85% fail on Leaks
- 0.21% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.21% fail on Operation
-
8.7% fail on
Components
-
1.7% fail on
Hub components
- 0.85% fail on Brake pads
- 0.63% fail on Brake discs
- 0.21% fail on Wheel cylinder
-
1.5% fail on
Service brake control components
(5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Pedal
(5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Anti-slip (9 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Condition
-
1.5% fail on
Pedal
(5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Parking brake
- 1.1% fail on Condition
- 0.42% fail on Restricted movement
-
13% fail on
Brake performance
(40% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
14% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(52% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 7.4% fail on Wipers
- 7.2% fail on Washers (100% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.42% fail on Bonnet
- 0.42% fail on Windscreen
- 0.21% fail on Mirrors
-
8.5% fail on
Steering
(86% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
7.6% fail on
Steering system
(97% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Track rod end (95% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.63% fail on Ball joint
-
0.21% fail on
Free play
- 0.21% fail on Steering rack
-
0.85% fail on
Power steering
- 0.85% fail on Pipes and hoses (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Steering control
- 0.21% fail on Steering lock
-
7.6% fail on
Steering system
(97% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
7.8% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
5.5% fail on
Seat belts
- 5.3% fail on Prescribed areas (68% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Condition
-
2.3% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 1.9% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
- 0.21% fail on Drivers airbag
- 0.21% fail on Passengers airbag
-
5.5% fail on
Seat belts
-
7.2% fail on
Tyres
- 4.2% fail on Tread depth
- 3.2% fail on Condition
- 0.42% fail on Size/type
-
3.4% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 1.9% fail on Body condition
-
1.5% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 1.5% fail on Chassis
- 0.21% fail on Engine mountings
-
1.3% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.3% fail on Registration plate
-
0.42% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.42% fail on Attachment