Daewoo Matiz MOT Results
Registered in 199948.3% pass rate
from 89 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Daewoo Matiz is unusually good or bad.
-
16% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
7.9% fail on
Headlamps
- 7.9% fail on Headlamp
-
3.4% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.4% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.2% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 1.1% fail on Switch
-
3.4% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.2% fail on Stop lamp
-
1.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.1% fail on Headlamp aim
- 1.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.1% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 1.1% fail on Horn
-
7.9% fail on
Headlamps
-
16% fail on
Suspension
- 7.9% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 4.5% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
4.5% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.2% fail on Ball joint
- 2.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
3.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 3.4% fail on Pins and bushes (8 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
13% fail on
Brakes
-
7.9% fail on
Brake performance
-
6.7% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
6.7% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 5.6% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Service brake performance
-
6.7% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
3.4% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.4% fail on
Rbt
- 3.4% fail on Service brake performance
-
3.4% fail on
Rbt
-
1.1% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
6.7% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
- 4.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
1.1% fail on
Parking brake control
- 1.1% fail on Lever
-
1.1% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 1.1% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
1.1% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.1% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.1% fail on Brake discs
-
1.1% fail on
Brake discs and drums
-
7.9% fail on
Brake performance
-
12% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
12% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
12% fail on
Spark ignition
- 11% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested
-
12% fail on
Spark ignition
-
1.1% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 1.1% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
12% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
9.0% fail on
Visibility
- 9.0% fail on Washers (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Wipers
-
9.0% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
4.5% fail on
Transmission
-
4.5% fail on
Drive shafts
- 4.5% fail on Joints
-
4.5% fail on
Drive shafts
-
2.2% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 2.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
2.2% fail on
Fuel system
- 2.2% fail on Tank (19 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Exhaust system
-
4.5% fail on
Transmission
-
9.0% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
5.6% fail on
Seat belts
- 4.5% fail on Prescribed areas
- 1.1% fail on Requirements
- 3.4% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
5.6% fail on
Seat belts
-
6.7% fail on
Steering
-
3.4% fail on
Steering gear
- 3.4% fail on Steering rack
-
2.2% fail on
Power steering
- 1.1% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 1.1% fail on Other components
-
1.1% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 1.1% fail on Track rod end
-
3.4% fail on
Steering gear
-
4.5% fail on
Road Wheels
(13 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Attachment (13 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Condition
-
3.4% fail on
Tyres
- 2.2% fail on Condition
- 1.1% fail on Tread depth
-
1.1% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.1% fail on Registration plates