Daewoo Matiz MOT Results

Registered in 1999
41.0% pass rate
from 473 tests in 2017
(21% worse than other 1999 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Daewoo Matiz is unusually good or bad.

  • 29% fail on Suspension (33% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 11% fail on Prescribed areas (78% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 9.7% fail on Component mounting (100% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 11% fail on Drive shafts (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 11% fail on Front drive shafts (180% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 11% fail on Constant velocity joints (180% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.21% fail on Drive shafts
    • 6.1% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 5.1% fail on Rear (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Front
    • 4.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.21% fail on Condition
    • 2.3% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.63% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.63% fail on Condition
    • 0.42% fail on Coil springs (85% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Condition (84% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.42% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.42% fail on Condition (16 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.42% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.42% fail on Condition
    • 0.21% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.21% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.21% fail on Panhard rods
      • 0.21% fail on Condition
  • 26% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 11% fail on Headlamp aim (58% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 7.8% fail on Headlamps (84% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 7.6% fail on Headlamp (86% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.21% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
      • 0.21% fail on Switch
    • 4.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.0% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.63% fail on Rear lamps
    • 4.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.8% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 1.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.1% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.63% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.3% fail on Battery
    • 1.1% fail on Horn
    • 0.63% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.42% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.21% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.21% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 23% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (100% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 17% fail on Emissions (160% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.5% fail on Fuel system (160% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Tank (10 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Cap
      • 0.42% fail on System
      • 0.21% fail on Hose
    • 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 22% fail on Brakes (26% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 13% fail on Brake performance (40% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 9.9% fail on Front wheels (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 4.7% fail on Rear wheels
      • 2.7% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 2.3% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.9% fail on Brake imbalance (190% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 9.3% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 8.7% fail on Components
        • 8.0% fail on Pipes (93% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.63% fail on Hoses
        • 0.21% fail on Cylinders
        • 0.21% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.85% fail on Leaks
      • 0.21% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.21% fail on Operation
    • 1.7% fail on Hub components
      • 0.85% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.63% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.21% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 1.5% fail on Service brake control components (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Pedal (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Anti-slip (9 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on Condition
    • 1.1% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.42% fail on Restricted movement
  • 14% fail on Driver's view of the road (52% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 7.4% fail on Wipers
    • 7.2% fail on Washers (100% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.42% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.42% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.21% fail on Mirrors
  • 8.5% fail on Steering (86% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 7.6% fail on Steering system (97% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Track rod end (95% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.63% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.21% fail on Free play
        • 0.21% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.85% fail on Power steering
      • 0.85% fail on Pipes and hoses (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Steering control
      • 0.21% fail on Steering lock
  • 7.8% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 5.5% fail on Seat belts
      • 5.3% fail on Prescribed areas (68% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Condition
    • 2.3% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 1.9% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.21% fail on Drivers airbag
      • 0.21% fail on Passengers airbag
  • 7.2% fail on Tyres
    • 4.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.2% fail on Condition
    • 0.42% fail on Size/type
  • 3.4% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.9% fail on Body condition
    • 1.5% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.5% fail on Chassis
    • 0.21% fail on Engine mountings
  • 1.3% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.42% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.42% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages