MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Daewoo » Lanos » 2000

Daewoo Lanos MOT Results

Registered in 2000
56.5% pass rate
from 138 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Daewoo Lanos is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 8.7% fail on Stop lamp (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.72% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.4% fail on Position lamps (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Position lamp (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.72% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.72% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.72% fail on Battery(ies)
  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 8.7% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.8% fail on Service brake performance
        • 5.8% fail on Rbt
          • 5.1% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.72% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 3.6% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 3.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 3.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.72% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.72% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.72% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.72% fail on Rbt
          • 0.72% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 4.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.2% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 2.2% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.72% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.72% fail on Pedal
  • 14% fail on Suspension
    • 7.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.9% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.4% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.72% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.72% fail on Linkage
    • 2.2% fail on Springs
      • 2.2% fail on Coil springs
        • 2.2% fail on Coil spring
    • 2.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.72% fail on Suspension arm
    • 0.72% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.72% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.72% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.72% fail on Macpherson strut
  • 10% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.3% fail on Transmission
      • 3.6% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.6% fail on Joints
      • 0.72% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.72% fail on Joints
    • 2.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.4% fail on Chassis
      • 1.4% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.4% fail on Bumpers (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.72% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.72% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.72% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.72% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
  • 8.7% fail on Visibility
    • 5.1% fail on Washers
    • 3.6% fail on Wipers
  • 8.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 7.2% fail on Seat belts (190% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 7.2% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 3.6% fail on Tyres
    • 2.9% fail on Condition
    • 0.72% fail on Tread depth
  • 2.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.9% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.9% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.2% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.72% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 2.2% fail on Steering
    • 2.2% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.2% fail on Track rod end
  • 1.4% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages