MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Dacia » Sandero » 2015

Dacia Sandero MOT Results

Registered in 2015
70.1% pass rate
from 15,062 tests in 2021
(59% worse than other 2015 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2015 cars and highlighted areas where the Dacia Sandero is unusually good or bad.

  • 11% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (130% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Headlamp aim (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 5.1% fail on Headlamp aim (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (87% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamps (110% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp (45% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.83% fail on Headlamp levelling device (20 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Dipswitch (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Electrical equipment (19 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Horn (29 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.040% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.0066% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (190% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.74% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.14% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (42% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Rear fog lamp (42% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Rear fog lamp (42% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.093% fail on Direction indicators (78% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.093% fail on Flashing type (78% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.053% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.027% fail on Side repeaters (91% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.013% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.066% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.046% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.046% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.013% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.013% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.0066% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.0066% fail on Switch
    • 0.0066% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.0066% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 7.5% fail on Visibility (92% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Wipers (67% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Washers (150% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.086% fail on View to rear
      • 0.086% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.027% fail on Driver's view (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.013% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.013% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.013% fail on Windscreen
  • 6.0% fail on Suspension (87% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Springs (42% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Coil springs (42% worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 2.3% fail on Coil spring (42% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Suspension arms (130% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.0066% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.0066% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.0066% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.8% fail on Anti-roll bars (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.94% fail on Linkage (37 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (33 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Pins and bushes (14 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.053% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting (45 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.046% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (21 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.046% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.033% fail on Anti-roll bar (6 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.033% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.15% fail on Other suspension component (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.11% fail on Shock absorbers (53% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.066% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.020% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.0066% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.0066% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.0066% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.0066% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.0066% fail on Suspension rod
  • 6.0% fail on Brakes (71% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Mechanical brake components (51% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Brake linings and pads (17% worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 2.1% fail on Brake pads (18% worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.013% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.6% fail on Brake discs and drums (160% worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Brake discs (160% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.066% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (170% worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.060% fail on Lever (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.0066% fail on Brake slack adjuster
    • 2.8% fail on Brake performance (160% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance (180% worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt (180% worse than other 2015 cars)
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
          • 0.23% fail on Service brake imbalance (110% worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.013% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.013% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.0066% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.0066% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (180% worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 1.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (190% worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.013% fail on Plate brake tester (sp) (11 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.50% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
          • 0.45% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
          • 0.046% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (200% worse than other 2015 cars)
          • 0.0066% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.0066% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.0066% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.0066% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.0066% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.33% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (170% worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.33% fail on Rbt (sp) (180% worse than other 2015 cars)
          • 0.22% fail on Service brake imbalance (190% worse than other 2015 cars)
          • 0.13% fail on Service brake performance (160% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.060% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.37% fail on Parking brake control (170% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Lever (200% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (120% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Hand lever (190% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.053% fail on Pedal
    • 0.066% fail on Hydraulic systems (160% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.053% fail on Brake fluid (200% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.060% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (55% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.053% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.013% fail on Electronic stability control (85% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.027% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.020% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
      • 0.0066% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.013% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.0066% fail on Rigid brake pipes
  • 4.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Transmission (10 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Drive shafts (11 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 4.3% fail on Joints (11 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.013% fail on Flexible couplings (12 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Prop shafts (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Joints (7 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Exhaust system (65% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.086% fail on Doors
      • 0.046% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.046% fail on Door condition (170% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.033% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.033% fail on Door condition
      • 0.013% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.013% fail on Door condition
    • 0.060% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.046% fail on Seats
      • 0.033% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.013% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.040% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.033% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.0066% fail on Tank
    • 0.040% fail on Body
      • 0.033% fail on Other body component
      • 0.0066% fail on Panel
    • 0.020% fail on Undertray
  • 3.9% fail on Tyres
    • 2.8% fail on Tread depth (22% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Condition (43% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.060% fail on Size/type
  • 0.86% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (25% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.81% fail on Exhaust emissions (26% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.44% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.17% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.046% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.013% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.16% fail on Compression ignition (65% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (57% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.033% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (75% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.046% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.033% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.013% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks (6 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.013% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.013% fail on Undertray
  • 0.44% fail on Steering
    • 0.29% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.27% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.027% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.13% fail on Power steering (15 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.100% fail on Operation (23 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.040% fail on Pipes and hoses (22 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.027% fail on Other components (8 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.020% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.020% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.40% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.27% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.19% fail on Condition
      • 0.060% fail on Requirements (7 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Attachment
    • 0.14% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.0066% fail on Airbags
      • 0.0066% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.066% fail on Identification of the vehicle (70% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.066% fail on Registration plates (70% better than other 2015 cars)
  • 0.040% fail on Road Wheels (82% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.027% fail on Condition
    • 0.013% fail on Attachment (92% better than other 2015 cars)
  • 0.0066% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.0066% fail on Speedometer
  • 0.0066% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.0066% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages