MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Dacia » Logan MCV » 2017

Dacia Logan MCV MOT Results

Registered in 2017
79.1% pass rate
from 2,364 tests in 2021
(60% worse than other 2017 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 cars and highlighted areas where the Dacia Logan MCV is unusually good or bad.

  • 8.3% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Headlamp aim (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 4.6% fail on Headlamp aim (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamps (3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp (3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Headlamp levelling device (18 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.89% fail on Stop lamp (170% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.63% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.17% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.17% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.085% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.085% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.085% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.085% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.085% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.042% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.085% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.085% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.042% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.042% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.042% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 7.6% fail on Visibility (110% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Wipers (110% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Washers (120% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on View to rear (4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Mirrors (5 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.13% fail on Windscreen
  • 3.0% fail on Tyres
    • 2.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.0% fail on Condition (49% better than other 2017 cars)
  • 2.8% fail on Brakes
    • 1.5% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.2% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.1% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.042% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.47% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.47% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.1% fail on Brake performance (130% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.63% fail on Service brake performance (120% worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.59% fail on Rbt (110% worse than other 2017 cars)
          • 0.51% fail on Service brake performance (120% worse than other 2017 cars)
          • 0.13% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.042% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.042% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.34% fail on Parking brake performance (6 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.34% fail on Rbt (6 times worse than other 2017 cars)
          • 0.25% fail on Parking brake performance (6 times worse than other 2017 cars)
          • 0.085% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (14 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.30% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.085% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.085% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.085% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.042% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.13% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.085% fail on Pedal
      • 0.042% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.13% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.13% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.042% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.085% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.085% fail on Lever
  • 1.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (120% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Exhaust emissions (120% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.72% fail on Spark ignition (130% worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.51% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (160% worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.042% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.42% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.34% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.085% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
    • 0.085% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.085% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 0.85% fail on Suspension
    • 0.51% fail on Anti-roll bars (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Linkage (14 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (36 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.085% fail on Pins and bushes (20 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.042% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.042% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.30% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.30% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.085% fail on Wheel bearings
  • 0.30% fail on Steering
    • 0.25% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.21% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.042% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.042% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.042% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.30% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.085% fail on Transmission
      • 0.085% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.085% fail on Joints
    • 0.042% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.042% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.042% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.042% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.042% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.042% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.042% fail on Seats
      • 0.042% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 0.17% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.17% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.17% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.17% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.17% fail on Condition
    • 0.042% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.042% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.042% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages