Dacia Logan MCV MOT Results

Registered in 2016
78.9% pass rate
from 2,967 tests in 2020
(72% worse than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Dacia Logan MCV is unusually good or bad.

  • 9.8% fail on Visibility (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 8.0% fail on Wipers (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Washers (140% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on View to rear
      • 0.13% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.067% fail on Driver's view
  • 7.5% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (110% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Headlamp aim (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 5.9% fail on Headlamp aim (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.1% fail on Headlamps (130% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Headlamp (82% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Headlamp levelling device (23 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.54% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.37% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.34% fail on Electrical equipment (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Horn (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.067% fail on Electrical wiring (10 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.034% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.24% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.24% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.24% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.13% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.13% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.034% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.034% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.034% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.034% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.034% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.034% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.034% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 3.3% fail on Brakes (63% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Mechanical brake components (100% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Brake linings and pads (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 2.8% fail on Brake pads (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.034% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.20% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.20% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.30% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.20% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.20% fail on Rbt
          • 0.13% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.13% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.067% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.067% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.034% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.034% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.034% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.13% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.13% fail on Lever
    • 0.034% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.034% fail on Hand lever
  • 2.7% fail on Tyres
    • 1.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.94% fail on Condition (49% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.034% fail on Size/type
  • 0.61% fail on Steering (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Steering linkage components (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Track rod end (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.034% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.10% fail on Steering gear (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Steering rack (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.067% fail on Power steering (27 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.034% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.034% fail on Other components
  • 0.44% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 0.44% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.27% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.20% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.10% fail on Catalyst emissions
      • 0.17% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.13% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.034% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
  • 0.40% fail on Suspension
    • 0.20% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.034% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.13% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.067% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (34 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.034% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.034% fail on Linkage
    • 0.034% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.034% fail on Springs
      • 0.034% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.034% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.034% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.034% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 0.30% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.10% fail on Transmission
      • 0.067% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.067% fail on Joints
      • 0.034% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.034% fail on Joints
    • 0.067% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.067% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.067% fail on Body
      • 0.067% fail on Other body component
    • 0.034% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.034% fail on Load security
      • 0.034% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.034% fail on Tailgate condition
        • 0.034% fail on Other tailgate component
  • 0.24% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.24% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.20% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.10% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.10% fail on Condition
    • 0.10% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.17% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.13% fail on Condition
    • 0.034% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages