Citroen ZX MOT Results

Registered in 1995
51.5% pass rate
from 293 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen ZX is unusually good or bad.

  • 30% fail on Suspension (73% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 16% fail on Prescribed areas (150% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 9.6% fail on Component mounting (87% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 6.1% fail on Subframe mounting (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Spring mounting (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 6.5% fail on Anti-roll bars (130% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (140% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.34% fail on Attachment
    • 4.4% fail on Drive shafts
      • 4.4% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 4.4% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 4.1% fail on Wheel bearings (140% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Rear
      • 1.7% fail on Front
    • 2.0% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.7% fail on Sub-frames (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (9 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Attachment (7 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.68% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.68% fail on Condition
    • 0.34% fail on General condition
    • 0.34% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.34% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.34% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.34% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.34% fail on Axles
      • 0.34% fail on Axle beam
  • 23% fail on Brakes (54% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 18% fail on Brake performance (130% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 9.9% fail on Rear wheels (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 8.2% fail on Parking brake performance (150% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 6.8% fail on Front wheels (110% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Service brake performance (160% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.68% fail on Brake operation (7 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 3.8% fail on Components
        • 1.7% fail on Valves (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 1.0% fail on Hoses
        • 0.68% fail on Pipes (80% better than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.34% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.34% fail on Operation
      • 0.34% fail on Leaks
    • 2.4% fail on Parking brake
      • 2.4% fail on Condition
    • 1.7% fail on Hub components
      • 1.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.34% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.68% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.34% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.34% fail on Components
        • 0.34% fail on Hoses
  • 22% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 6.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 5.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.7% fail on Rear lamps
      • 2.4% fail on Front lamps
    • 5.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.8% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 3.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.8% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.0% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.0% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.0% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.34% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.34% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.34% fail on Switch
    • 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.7% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.34% fail on Battery
    • 0.34% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.34% fail on Horn
  • 12% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.8% fail on Washers (93% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Wipers
    • 1.4% fail on Mirrors (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.34% fail on Bonnet
  • 8.5% fail on Tyres
    • 3.4% fail on Condition
    • 2.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.4% fail on Size/type (9 times worse than other 1995 cars)
  • 7.2% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 2.4% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 2.4% fail on Chassis
    • 2.0% fail on Body condition
    • 1.4% fail on Doors
      • 1.0% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.34% fail on Passengers other
    • 1.0% fail on Speedometer (14 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.34% fail on Engine mountings
  • 6.1% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (43% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.7% fail on Emissions
    • 1.4% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.0% fail on System
      • 0.34% fail on Tank
  • 4.8% fail on Steering
    • 3.4% fail on Steering system
      • 2.7% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.68% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.0% fail on Power steering
      • 0.34% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.34% fail on Pump
      • 0.34% fail on Rams
    • 0.34% fail on Steering operation
  • 4.4% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 4.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.4% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.68% fail on Condition
      • 0.34% fail on Attachment
  • 2.4% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 2.4% fail on Registration plate

Search Good Garages