Citroen Xsara MOT Results
Registered in 201059.5% pass rate
from 1,629 tests in 2021
(12% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen Xsara is unusually good or bad.
-
16% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(32% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 5.8% fail on Stop lamp (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.3% fail on Headlamp
- 0.12% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
3.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.25% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
2.3% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.3% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.1% fail on Individual direction indicators (64% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.18% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.061% fail on Side repeaters
-
2.3% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.2% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(120% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(120% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(120% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.49% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
(18 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (19 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Main beam tell-tale (18 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.061% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.061% fail on Position lamp
-
0.061% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.061% fail on Reversing lamps
-
0.061% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.061% fail on Electrical wiring
-
13% fail on
Suspension
-
6.5% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(87% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Linkage ball joints (87% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Ball joint dust cover (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.061% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.061% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.061% fail on Pins and bushes
-
3.6% fail on
Springs
(33% better than other 2010 cars)
-
3.6% fail on
Coil springs
(34% better than other 2010 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Coil spring (35% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.061% fail on Mounting
- 0.061% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
3.6% fail on
Coil springs
(34% better than other 2010 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.9% fail on Ball joint
- 0.80% fail on Pins and bushes (52% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.68% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.98% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.12% fail on Macpherson strut
- 0.061% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.061% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.25% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.18% fail on Ball joint
- 0.061% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.18% fail on Shock absorbers (78% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.12% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.12% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
6.5% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(87% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
10% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(160% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
5.4% fail on
Transmission
(2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
5.4% fail on
Drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 5.3% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.061% fail on Drive shaft
-
5.4% fail on
Drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Exhaust system (86% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(32 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (45 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.74% fail on
Chassis
(31 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.74% fail on Chassis condition (32 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.31% fail on
Seats
(2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Passenger's seat (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Body
- 0.18% fail on Other body component
- 0.061% fail on Panel
-
0.12% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.12% fail on Pipe
- 0.061% fail on Bumpers
-
0.061% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.061% fail on Bracket
-
0.061% fail on
Doors
-
0.061% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.061% fail on Door condition
-
0.061% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
5.4% fail on
Transmission
(2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
6.4% fail on
Tyres
- 3.9% fail on Condition
- 2.8% fail on Tread depth
- 0.18% fail on Size/type
-
5.5% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
4.5% fail on
Seat belts
(9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Prescribed areas (72 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.61% fail on Condition
- 0.98% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
4.5% fail on
Seat belts
(9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
4.8% fail on
Brakes
(39% better than other 2010 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Brake performance
(59% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.98% fail on
Service brake performance
(51% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.92% fail on
Rbt
(53% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.61% fail on Service brake performance (64% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.061% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.061% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.92% fail on
Rbt
(53% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.98% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.98% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.98% fail on Service brake imbalance (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.98% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.55% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(69% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.55% fail on Rbt (sp) (67% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.31% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.31% fail on
Rbt
- 0.25% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.061% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.31% fail on
Rbt
-
0.98% fail on
Service brake performance
(51% better than other 2010 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(120% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Anti-lock braking system (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.86% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
0.86% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(71% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.55% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.49% fail on Brake discs
- 0.061% fail on Brake drums
-
0.49% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(76% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Brake pads (76% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.55% fail on
Brake discs and drums
-
0.31% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.31% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.18% fail on Pedal
-
0.12% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.061% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.061% fail on Valves
- 0.12% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
1.7% fail on
Brake performance
(59% better than other 2010 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Visibility
- 2.5% fail on Washers
- 1.5% fail on Wipers (39% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.31% fail on
Condition of glass
(2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Windscreen (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.061% fail on
View to rear
- 0.061% fail on Mirrors
-
3.9% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
3.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
2.6% fail on
Compression ignition
(100% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.1% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.12% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.061% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.061% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
1.2% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.61% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.31% fail on Catalyst emissions (67% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Emissions not tested
-
2.6% fail on
Compression ignition
(100% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.061% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.061% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
-
3.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
2.0% fail on
Steering
-
0.86% fail on
Steering linkage components
(55% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Track rod end (56% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.061% fail on Ball joint
-
0.68% fail on
Steering gear
(120% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.68% fail on Steering rack (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.49% fail on
Power steering
(5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Other components (11 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Pipes and hoses (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.061% fail on Operation
- 0.061% fail on Rams
-
0.12% fail on
Steering play
- 0.12% fail on Steering rack
-
0.86% fail on
Steering linkage components
(55% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.12% fail on Attachment
-
0.061% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.061% fail on Registration plates
-
0.061% fail on
Speedometer and speed limiter
- 0.061% fail on Speedometer