MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Citroen » Xsara » 1999

Citroen Xsara MOT Results

Registered in 1999
51.3% pass rate
from 158 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen Xsara is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 19% fail on Exhaust emissions (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 18% fail on Spark ignition (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 16% fail on Catalyst emissions (190% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 1.3% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.63% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.63% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    • 0.63% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.63% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 16% fail on Brakes
    • 7.0% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.1% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.4% fail on Rbt
          • 4.4% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.63% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.63% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 3.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 3.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 2.5% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.63% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.63% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.63% fail on Rbt
          • 0.63% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 4.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.8% fail on Load sensing valves (16 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Pedal (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Hand lever (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.9% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.9% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.63% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.63% fail on Cable
    • 0.63% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.63% fail on Leaks
    • 0.63% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.63% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.63% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.63% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 16% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 7.6% fail on Exhaust system (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Transmission
      • 3.8% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.8% fail on Joints
      • 0.63% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.63% fail on Joints
    • 2.5% fail on Doors (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Front passenger's door (7 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Door condition (8 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 1.3% fail on Door condition
      • 0.63% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.63% fail on Door condition
    • 1.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.3% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.63% fail on Pipe
      • 0.63% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.63% fail on Body
      • 0.63% fail on Body condition
  • 11% fail on Suspension
    • 5.1% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.5% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 2.5% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.63% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.63% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 2.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.9% fail on Sub-frames
      • 1.3% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.63% fail on Sub-frame
    • 1.3% fail on Wheel bearings
  • 8.9% fail on Steering (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 8.2% fail on Steering gear (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 8.2% fail on Steering rack (7 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.3% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.63% fail on Power steering
      • 0.63% fail on Operation
  • 8.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.8% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.63% fail on Attachment
    • 4.4% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  • 7.6% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 2.5% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.5% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.3% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.63% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.63% fail on Switch
    • 1.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.3% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.63% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.63% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.63% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.63% fail on Position lamp
  • 7.0% fail on Visibility
    • 3.8% fail on Wipers
    • 1.9% fail on Washers
    • 1.3% fail on View to rear
      • 1.3% fail on Mirrors (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  • 3.8% fail on Tyres
    • 2.5% fail on Condition
    • 0.63% fail on Size/type
    • 0.63% fail on Tread depth
  • 0.63% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.63% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages