Citroen Xsara Picasso MOT Results
Registered in 200040.0% pass rate
from 1,635 tests in 2017
(22% worse than other 2000 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen Xsara Picasso is unusually good or bad.
-
32% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(31% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
11% fail on
Position lamps
(75% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 8.0% fail on Front lamps (66% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Rear lamps (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.061% fail on All position lamps
- 11% fail on Registration plate lamp (84% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 10% fail on Stop lamp (83% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
8.4% fail on
Direction indicators
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
8.4% fail on
Flashing type
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 4.6% fail on Individual lamps (180% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 4.5% fail on Side repeaters (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.49% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.12% fail on Tell tales
-
8.4% fail on
Flashing type
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Headlamp aim (46% better than other 2000 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.3% fail on Headlamp
-
0.061% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.061% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
-
1.4% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.3% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.18% fail on Tell tale
- 0.31% fail on Horn
- 0.12% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.061% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.061% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.061% fail on Rear reflectors
-
11% fail on
Position lamps
(75% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
29% fail on
Suspension
(36% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
9.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(99% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 7.9% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (82% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Linkage condition (79% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.061% fail on Condition
- 0.061% fail on Attachment
-
8.8% fail on
Suspension arms
(110% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 8.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Attachment
- 0.061% fail on Condition
-
7.8% fail on
Drive shafts
(79% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
7.6% fail on
Front drive shafts
(80% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 7.6% fail on Constant velocity joints (80% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.061% fail on Drive shafts
-
0.12% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.12% fail on Drive shafts
-
7.6% fail on
Front drive shafts
(80% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
5.3% fail on
Coil springs
(70% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 5.2% fail on Condition (73% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.061% fail on Location
- 3.4% fail on Front suspension joints (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Prescribed areas
(45% better than other 2000 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Component mounting (42% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Subframe mounting
-
1.9% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 1.2% fail on Front
- 0.73% fail on Rear
-
0.49% fail on
Shock absorbers
(70% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Condition (70% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.37% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.37% fail on Condition
-
0.18% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.18% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.12% fail on
Axles
- 0.12% fail on Swivel joints/housing
- 0.061% fail on General condition
-
0.061% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.061% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.061% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.061% fail on Condition
-
0.061% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.061% fail on Condition
-
9.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(99% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
17% fail on
Brakes
-
9.1% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(39% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
8.3% fail on
Components
(36% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 5.9% fail on Pipes (42% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Hoses (66% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Cylinders (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.061% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.92% fail on Leaks (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.061% fail on Operation
-
8.3% fail on
Components
(36% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
5.3% fail on
Brake performance
(42% better than other 2000 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Front wheels
- 2.5% fail on Rear wheels (39% better than other 2000 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance (66% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.86% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.37% fail on Service brake performance (68% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
3.3% fail on
Hub components
- 2.0% fail on Brake pads
- 1.7% fail on Brake discs (92% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Wheel cylinder
- 1.2% fail on ABS
-
0.43% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.43% fail on
Pedal
- 0.43% fail on Anti-slip (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.43% fail on
Pedal
- 0.31% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.24% fail on
Parking brake
(77% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Condition (77% better than other 2000 cars)
-
9.1% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(39% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
15% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(34% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 10% fail on Exhaust system (98% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 5.9% fail on Emissions
- 1.6% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.43% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.18% fail on System
- 0.12% fail on Tank
- 0.061% fail on Hose
- 0.061% fail on Pipe
-
14% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(49% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 8.1% fail on Wipers (44% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 6.3% fail on Washers (73% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Windscreen
- 0.61% fail on Mirrors
-
11% fail on
Tyres
(31% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 7.5% fail on Tread depth (48% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 4.0% fail on Condition
- 0.18% fail on Size/type
- 0.061% fail on Valve stem
-
9.8% fail on
Steering
(110% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
8.6% fail on
Steering system
(120% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 5.0% fail on Track rod end (100% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 3.6% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Ball joint
-
0.18% fail on
Free play
- 0.18% fail on Steering rack
- 0.12% fail on Steering arm
- 0.061% fail on Drag link end
-
1.1% fail on
Power steering
(94% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.55% fail on Other components (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.12% fail on Rams (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.061% fail on Operation
- 0.24% fail on Steering operation
-
0.12% fail on
Steering control
- 0.061% fail on Steering wheel
- 0.061% fail on Steering column
-
8.6% fail on
Steering system
(120% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
9.4% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(87% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
7.1% fail on
Seat belts
(110% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 6.2% fail on Prescribed areas (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.92% fail on Condition
- 0.12% fail on Requirements
-
2.6% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(55% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 2.5% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (58% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.061% fail on Drivers airbag
- 0.061% fail on Passengers airbag
-
7.1% fail on
Seat belts
(110% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
4.1% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 1.5% fail on Body condition
-
1.1% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 1.1% fail on Chassis
-
0.92% fail on
Seats
(170% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.73% fail on Passengers (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Drivers
-
0.37% fail on
Doors
- 0.24% fail on Passengers other
- 0.061% fail on Drivers
- 0.061% fail on Passengers front
- 0.18% fail on Engine mountings
- 0.061% fail on Speedometer
-
0.061% fail on
Load security
- 0.061% fail on Access panel
-
1.2% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.2% fail on Registration plate
-
0.31% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.24% fail on Attachment
- 0.061% fail on Condition
-
0.12% fail on
Towbars
- 0.12% fail on Towbar (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)