Citroen Synergie MOT Results

Registered in 2000
47.0% pass rate
from 251 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen Synergie is unusually good or bad.

  • 27% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 8.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 7.6% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 6.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.6% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.6% fail on Rear lamps
    • 5.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.2% fail on Headlamp
    • 5.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.6% fail on Side repeaters (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.80% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.40% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.40% fail on Tell tales
    • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.6% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.40% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.80% fail on Electrical wiring (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Horn
    • 0.40% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 27% fail on Suspension
    • 10% fail on Prescribed areas (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 6.0% fail on Component mounting
      • 6.0% fail on Subframe mounting (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Spring mounting
    • 9.6% fail on Suspension arms (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 8.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Condition
      • 0.40% fail on Attachment
    • 8.4% fail on Drive shafts (93% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 8.4% fail on Front drive shafts (97% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 8.4% fail on Constant velocity joints (99% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 2.0% fail on Coil springs
      • 2.0% fail on Condition
    • 2.0% fail on Trailing arms (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Sub-frames (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Attachment
    • 2.0% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 2.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.80% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.80% fail on Front
    • 0.40% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.40% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.40% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.40% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.40% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.40% fail on Condition
  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 7.2% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 7.2% fail on Components
        • 4.8% fail on Hoses (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 2.8% fail on Pipes
    • 3.2% fail on Brake performance (65% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.2% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.40% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.40% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.40% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 2.4% fail on Hub components
      • 2.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.80% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.6% fail on ABS
    • 0.80% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.40% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.40% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.40% fail on Condition
  • 12% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 7.6% fail on Wipers
    • 2.8% fail on Washers
    • 1.2% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.80% fail on Windscreen
  • 11% fail on Steering (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 10% fail on Steering system (160% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.80% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.40% fail on Free play
        • 0.40% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.80% fail on Power steering
      • 0.80% fail on Operation
      • 0.40% fail on Other components
  • 9.6% fail on Tyres
    • 5.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 4.4% fail on Condition
  • 8.8% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 6.4% fail on Doors (9 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 6.4% fail on Passengers other (19 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 2.0% fail on Chassis
    • 0.40% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.40% fail on Body condition
  • 8.8% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 5.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.6% fail on Emissions
    • 1.2% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.40% fail on Pipe
      • 0.40% fail on Cap
      • 0.40% fail on System
    • 0.40% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 3.2% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 2.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.6% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.80% fail on Condition
    • 1.2% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 1.2% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 1.2% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.80% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.80% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages