MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Citroen » Synergie » 2000

Citroen Synergie MOT Results

Registered in 2000
52.1% pass rate
from 71 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen Synergie is unusually good or bad.

  • 28% fail on Suspension (84% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 21% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 7.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.2% fail on Ball joint
      • 2.8% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 5.6% fail on Sub-frames (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (10 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Sub-frame
    • 4.2% fail on Springs
      • 2.8% fail on Coil springs
        • 2.8% fail on Coil spring
      • 1.4% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
  • 24% fail on Body, chassis, structure (150% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 9.9% fail on Transmission (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 9.9% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 9.9% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 5.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Chassis (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 5.6% fail on Chassis condition (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.8% fail on Body (8 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Other body component (20 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Doors
      • 2.8% fail on Other passenger's door (10 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 2.8% fail on Door condition (10 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Engine mounting
      • 1.4% fail on Engine mounting condition
  • 17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.2% fail on Headlamp
    • 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.8% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 1.4% fail on Side repeaters
    • 2.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.4% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.4% fail on Horn
  • 11% fail on Brakes
    • 4.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.8% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 2.8% fail on Brake discs
      • 1.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.4% fail on Brake pads
    • 4.2% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.2% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.2% fail on Rbt
          • 4.2% fail on Service brake performance
    • 1.4% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 1.4% fail on Valves
    • 1.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.4% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.4% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 8.5% fail on Visibility
    • 5.6% fail on Wipers
    • 2.8% fail on Washers
  • 4.2% fail on Steering
    • 4.2% fail on Steering gear
      • 4.2% fail on Steering rack
  • 4.2% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 4.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.8% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.4% fail on Condition
  • 2.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.8% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.8% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.4% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 1.4% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
  • 1.4% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages