Citroen Synergie MOT Results

Registered in 1996
38.0% pass rate
from 50 tests in 2020
(59% worse than other 1996 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen Synergie is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Body, chassis, structure (110% worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 8.0% fail on Exhaust system
    • 8.0% fail on Transmission
      • 8.0% fail on Drive shafts
        • 8.0% fail on Joints
    • 4.0% fail on Doors (7 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Other passenger's door (18 times worse than other 1996 cars)
        • 4.0% fail on Door condition (19 times worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 2.0% fail on Fuel system
      • 2.0% fail on Hose
    • 2.0% fail on Body
      • 2.0% fail on Other body component
  • 20% fail on Brakes
    • 10% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.0% fail on Service brake performance
        • 6.0% fail on Rbt
          • 4.0% fail on Service brake performance
          • 2.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 6.0% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 6.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 4.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
    • 4.0% fail on Hydraulic systems (10 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Brake fluid
      • 2.0% fail on Valves
    • 4.0% fail on Flexible brake hoses (7 times worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 2.0% fail on Pedal
    • 2.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes
  • 20% fail on Suspension
    • 14% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (170% worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 6.0% fail on Ball joint
      • 4.0% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.0% fail on Axles
      • 2.0% fail on Axle
    • 2.0% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 2.0% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 2.0% fail on Sub-frames
      • 2.0% fail on Sub-frame
  • 18% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 6.0% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 6.0% fail on Direction indicators
      • 6.0% fail on Flashing type
        • 6.0% fail on Individual direction indicators (3 times worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 6.0% fail on Horn (6 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp levelling device
  • 14% fail on Visibility
    • 10% fail on Wipers
    • 4.0% fail on Washers
    • 2.0% fail on Driver's view
    • 2.0% fail on View to rear
      • 2.0% fail on Mirrors
  • 14% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 10% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 6.0% fail on Compression ignition (5 times worse than other 1996 cars)
        • 4.0% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (8 times worse than other 1996 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 4.0% fail on Spark ignition
        • 4.0% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 6.0% fail on Fluid leaks (5 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 2.0% fail on Other leaks
  • 8.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 8.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 4.0% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 2.0% fail on Attachment
      • 2.0% fail on Requirements
      • 2.0% fail on Condition
  • 8.0% fail on Tyres
    • 8.0% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Tread depth
  • 4.0% fail on Steering
    • 4.0% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 4.0% fail on Track rod end

Search Good Garages