Citroen Saxo MOT Results

Registered in 2004
59.1% pass rate
from 115 tests in 2021
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen Saxo is unusually good or bad.

  • 15% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 7.0% fail on Transmission
      • 7.0% fail on Drive shafts
        • 7.0% fail on Joints
    • 6.1% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.7% fail on Seats (7 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Driver's seat (14 times worse than other 2004 cars)
  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 11% fail on Brake performance
      • 10% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (8 times worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 10% fail on Rbt (sp) (8 times worse than other 2004 cars)
          • 6.1% fail on Service brake imbalance (6 times worse than other 2004 cars)
          • 4.3% fail on Service brake performance (10 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 7.0% fail on Service brake performance
        • 7.0% fail on Rbt
          • 6.1% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.87% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt
          • 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 2.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.87% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.87% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.87% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.87% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.87% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.87% fail on Lever
    • 1.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.87% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.87% fail on Pedal
    • 0.87% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.87% fail on Reservoirs
  • 13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 3.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.5% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.5% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.5% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 1.7% fail on Side repeaters
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.6% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.7% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.87% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.87% fail on Horn
    • 0.87% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.87% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.87% fail on Rear fog lamp
  • 7.8% fail on Visibility
    • 4.3% fail on Wipers
    • 2.6% fail on Washers
    • 0.87% fail on Bonnet
  • 7.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 7.0% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 7.0% fail on Spark ignition
        • 6.1% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 1.7% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.87% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.87% fail on Catalytic converter
  • 5.2% fail on Steering
    • 4.3% fail on Steering gear (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.87% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.87% fail on Track rod end
  • 5.2% fail on Suspension (70% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.87% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.87% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.87% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.87% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.87% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.87% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.87% fail on Other suspension component
  • 3.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.6% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.6% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.87% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 3.5% fail on Tyres
    • 1.7% fail on Condition
    • 1.7% fail on Tread depth
  • 1.7% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.7% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages