Citroen Saxo MOT Results
Registered in 199953.3% pass rate
from 285 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen Saxo is unusually good or bad.
-
22% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(170% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
22% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(180% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
22% fail on
Spark ignition
(200% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 19% fail on Catalyst emissions (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.70% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.35% fail on Catalytic converter
- 0.35% fail on NOx sensor
- 0.35% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.70% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.35% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.35% fail on Other emission control equipment
- 0.35% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
0.35% fail on
Emission control equipment
-
22% fail on
Spark ignition
(200% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
22% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(180% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
18% fail on
Brakes
(44% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
15% fail on
Brake performance
(100% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
11% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
11% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 7.0% fail on Service brake imbalance (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 4.9% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
11% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
5.3% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 5.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
3.9% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.9% fail on
Rbt
- 2.5% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
3.9% fail on
Rbt
-
0.35% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.35% fail on
Rbt
- 0.35% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.35% fail on
Rbt
-
11% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
1.4% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Pedal (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Hand lever
- 1.1% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
1.1% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
0.70% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.70% fail on Brake discs
-
0.35% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.35% fail on Brake pads
-
0.70% fail on
Brake discs and drums
-
0.35% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.35% fail on Lever
-
15% fail on
Brake performance
(100% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
17% fail on
Suspension
- 13% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (160% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
4.2% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.8% fail on Ball joint
- 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.70% fail on Pins and bushes
-
1.8% fail on
Sub-frames
- 1.4% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 0.35% fail on Pins and bushes
- 1.1% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.70% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(79% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.35% fail on Linkage ball joints
-
0.35% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.35% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
15% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(59% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 4.6% fail on Exhaust system
-
4.2% fail on
Transmission
-
3.9% fail on
Drive shafts
- 3.9% fail on Joints
-
0.35% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.35% fail on Joints
-
3.9% fail on
Drive shafts
-
3.2% fail on
Chassis
(160% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Chassis condition (160% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 2.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
1.1% fail on
Seats
- 1.1% fail on Driver's seat (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.70% fail on
Doors
-
0.35% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.35% fail on Catch
-
0.35% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.35% fail on Catch
-
0.35% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.70% fail on Floor (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.70% fail on
Cabs
(4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.70% fail on Prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.35% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.35% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.35% fail on Bumpers
-
0.35% fail on
Spare wheel
- 0.35% fail on Spare wheel condition
-
0.35% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.35% fail on Engine mounting condition
-
0.35% fail on
Body
- 0.35% fail on Mounting fixings
-
12% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
4.6% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 4.6% fail on Headlamp aim
-
3.9% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.9% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.1% fail on Side repeaters (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.35% fail on All direction indicators
-
3.9% fail on
Flashing type
- 3.2% fail on Stop lamp
-
1.1% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 1.1% fail on Horn
-
0.70% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.70% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.70% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.70% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.70% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 0.35% fail on Rear reflectors
-
4.6% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
6.7% fail on
Visibility
- 3.5% fail on Wipers
- 3.5% fail on Washers
-
0.35% fail on
View to rear
- 0.35% fail on Indirect vision devices
-
5.6% fail on
Steering
-
4.6% fail on
Steering gear
(3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 4.6% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.70% fail on
Power steering
- 0.70% fail on Operation (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.35% fail on
Steering play
- 0.35% fail on Steering rack
-
4.6% fail on
Steering gear
(3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
4.6% fail on
Tyres
- 2.5% fail on Tread depth
- 1.8% fail on Condition
- 0.35% fail on Size/type
-
3.9% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 2.8% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
1.1% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.70% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.35% fail on Condition
-
0.70% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.70% fail on Registration plates
-
0.35% fail on
Speedometer and speed limiter
- 0.35% fail on Speedometer
-
0.35% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.35% fail on Attachment