Citroen Saxo MOT Results
Registered in 199750.5% pass rate
from 186 tests in 2021
(34% worse than other 1997 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1997 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen Saxo is unusually good or bad.
-
19% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(95% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
9.1% fail on
Transmission
(2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
9.1% fail on
Drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 9.1% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
9.1% fail on
Drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Exhaust system
-
3.8% fail on
Chassis
(180% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Chassis condition (180% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 2.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
2.2% fail on
Doors
(2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 1.1% fail on Door condition (4 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
0.54% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.54% fail on Door condition
-
0.54% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.54% fail on Door condition
-
1.1% fail on
Front passenger's door
-
1.1% fail on
Body
- 1.1% fail on Other body component (7 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
0.54% fail on
Spare wheel
- 0.54% fail on Spare wheel condition
-
9.1% fail on
Transmission
(2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
18% fail on
Brakes
(59% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
13% fail on
Brake performance
(79% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
9.7% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
9.7% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 5.4% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 4.8% fail on Service brake imbalance (190% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
9.7% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
5.4% fail on
Service brake performance
-
5.4% fail on
Rbt
- 4.3% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
5.4% fail on
Rbt
-
3.2% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 3.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
0.54% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.54% fail on
Rbt
- 0.54% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.54% fail on
Rbt
-
9.7% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
2.7% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.6% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.1% fail on Brake discs
- 0.54% fail on Brake drums
-
1.1% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.1% fail on Brake pads
-
0.54% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.54% fail on Cable
-
1.6% fail on
Brake discs and drums
-
2.2% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(4 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Pedal (7 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
(7 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (21 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 1.1% fail on Brake fluid (7 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
0.54% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.54% fail on Lever
- 0.54% fail on Load sensing valves
-
13% fail on
Brake performance
(79% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
17% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(120% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
17% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(130% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
16% fail on
Spark ignition
(130% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 14% fail on Catalyst emissions (150% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Emissions not tested
-
1.1% fail on
Compression ignition
- 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested (5 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
16% fail on
Spark ignition
(130% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 1.1% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
17% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(130% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
15% fail on
Suspension
- 6.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
3.8% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.7% fail on Pins and bushes
- 1.1% fail on Ball joint
- 0.54% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 2.2% fail on Wheel bearings
-
1.6% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.6% fail on Linkage ball joints
-
1.1% fail on
Sub-frames
- 1.1% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
0.54% fail on
Springs
-
0.54% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.54% fail on Coil spring
-
0.54% fail on
Coil springs
-
0.54% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.54% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
12% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
4.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 4.3% fail on Headlamp aim
- 4.3% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.2% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 1.6% fail on Horn
- 0.54% fail on Electrical wiring
-
1.6% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.6% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.1% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.54% fail on Side repeaters
-
1.6% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.1% fail on
Headlamps
- 0.54% fail on Headlamp
- 0.54% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
0.54% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.54% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.54% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.54% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
4.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
8.1% fail on
Visibility
- 4.8% fail on Wipers
- 2.7% fail on Washers
- 0.54% fail on Bonnet
-
2.7% fail on
Tyres
- 1.1% fail on Condition
- 1.1% fail on Tread depth
- 0.54% fail on Size/type
-
1.1% fail on
Steering
-
0.54% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.54% fail on Steering rack
- 0.54% fail on Prescribed areas
-
0.54% fail on
Steering gear
-
1.1% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.54% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.54% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.54% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.54% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.54% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.54% fail on Registration plates
-
0.54% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.54% fail on Condition