Citroen Grand C4 Picasso MOT Results

Registered in 2017
82.5% pass rate
from 343 tests in 2020
(76% worse than other 2017 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen Grand C4 Picasso is unusually good or bad.

  • 5.8% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.29% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.58% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.58% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.58% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.29% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.29% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.29% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.29% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.29% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.29% fail on Horn
  • 4.1% fail on Tyres
    • 3.2% fail on Condition (150% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.87% fail on Tread depth
  • 3.5% fail on Brakes (140% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Mechanical brake components (190% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Brake linings and pads (190% worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 2.6% fail on Brake pads (200% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.87% fail on Brake discs and drums (3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.87% fail on Brake discs (3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Brake performance (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.87% fail on Service brake performance (4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.87% fail on Rbt (4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
          • 0.87% fail on Service brake performance (6 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Brake performance not tested
  • 1.7% fail on Visibility
    • 1.5% fail on Washers
    • 0.29% fail on Wipers
  • 1.7% fail on Suspension (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Anti-roll bars (15 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.87% fail on Linkage ball joints (26 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Linkage
      • 0.29% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.29% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.29% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.29% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  • 0.58% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.58% fail on Transmission (5 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Drive shafts (5 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.58% fail on Joints (5 times worse than other 2017 cars)
  • 0.29% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.29% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp

Search Good Garages