MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Citroen » Grand C4 Picasso » 2015

Citroen Grand C4 Picasso MOT Results

Registered in 2015
73.4% pass rate
from 271 tests in 2021
(48% worse than other 2015 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2015 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen Grand C4 Picasso is unusually good or bad.

  • 10% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (130% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (8 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamps (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Headlamp (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (10 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.5% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.1% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.37% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.74% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.37% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.37% fail on Position lamp
  • 6.6% fail on Tyres
    • 4.8% fail on Condition (120% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.37% fail on Size/type
  • 5.9% fail on Brakes
    • 4.8% fail on Mechanical brake components (120% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Brake linings and pads (170% worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 4.8% fail on Brake pads (170% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.37% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.37% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.37% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.37% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.37% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.37% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.37% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 0.37% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.37% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.37% fail on Electronic stability control
  • 3.0% fail on Visibility
    • 1.8% fail on Washers
    • 0.74% fail on Wipers
    • 0.37% fail on View to rear
      • 0.37% fail on Mirrors
  • 3.0% fail on Body, chassis, structure (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Transmission (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Drive shafts (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Joints (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.74% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.37% fail on Seats
      • 0.37% fail on Driver's seat
  • 2.6% fail on Suspension
    • 1.5% fail on Anti-roll bars (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (14 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.74% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.37% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.37% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.37% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 2.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.2% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.1% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.74% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.37% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.37% fail on Catalytic converter
      • 1.1% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 1.5% fail on Steering
    • 1.5% fail on Steering linkage components (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Track rod end (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
  • 0.74% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.37% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.37% fail on Condition
    • 0.37% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.74% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.74% fail on Attachment
  • 0.37% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.37% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages