Citroen Grand C4 Picasso MOT Results

Registered in 2012
60.1% pass rate
from 937 tests in 2020
(52% worse than other 2012 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2012 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen Grand C4 Picasso is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (140% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 7.9% fail on Stop lamp (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 7.4% fail on Direction indicators (4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 7.4% fail on Flashing type (4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 6.8% fail on Individual direction indicators (8 times worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on All direction indicators (4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on Side repeaters
    • 3.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (200% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Headlamps (74% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Headlamp (85% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 0.85% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.85% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.32% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.32% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.32% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.11% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.11% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.11% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.11% fail on Horn
  • 8.5% fail on Brakes (62% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Mechanical brake components (73% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 4.7% fail on Brake linings and pads (89% worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 4.7% fail on Brake pads (90% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.5% fail on Brake discs
    • 3.0% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (190% worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.75% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.75% fail on Rbt
          • 0.43% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.32% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.43% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.43% fail on Rbt
          • 0.32% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.11% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.21% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.21% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.21% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.21% fail on Service brake performance
    • 1.3% fail on Parking brake control (5 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Electronic parking brake (33 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.43% fail on Pedal (4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.32% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.21% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.21% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.11% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.11% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.11% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 8.5% fail on Tyres (52% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Tread depth (67% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Condition
    • 0.11% fail on Size/type
  • 6.5% fail on Visibility (56% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Wipers
    • 3.1% fail on Washers (75% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Driver's view
  • 5.8% fail on Suspension
    • 3.3% fail on Springs
      • 3.3% fail on Coil springs
        • 3.3% fail on Coil spring
        • 0.11% fail on Mounting
    • 1.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.53% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.43% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.1% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.53% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.11% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 0.32% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.32% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.32% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 2.6% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 1.7% fail on Transmission (150% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Drive shafts (160% worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on Joints (160% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on Seats (8 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Driver's seat (14 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Body
      • 0.21% fail on Other body component
    • 0.11% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.11% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.11% fail on Doors
      • 0.11% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.11% fail on Door condition
  • 1.9% fail on Steering (110% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Steering linkage components (100% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Track rod end (120% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.11% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.11% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.11% fail on Power steering
      • 0.11% fail on Operation
    • 0.11% fail on Steering wheel
  • 0.53% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 0.43% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.43% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.21% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.21% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.11% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.11% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.11% fail on Sound deadening material
  • 0.32% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.32% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.21% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.21% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.21% fail on Condition
  • 0.11% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.11% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages