Citroen Grand C4 Picasso MOT Results

Registered in 2010
49.5% pass rate
from 2,111 tests in 2020
(47% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen Grand C4 Picasso is unusually good or bad.

  • 31% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 11% fail on Position lamps (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 10% fail on Position lamp (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on All position lamps (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Switch
    • 10% fail on Stop lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 8.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Headlamps (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 6.0% fail on Headlamp (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 4.8% fail on Headlamp aim (61% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Headlamp aim (54% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.71% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Direction indicators (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Flashing type (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 4.0% fail on Individual direction indicators (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.24% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.095% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.047% fail on Switch
    • 0.47% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.47% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.47% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.14% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.14% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.14% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.14% fail on Horn
    • 0.095% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.047% fail on Daytime running lamps
  • 10% fail on Suspension
    • 4.5% fail on Springs
      • 4.5% fail on Coil springs
        • 4.5% fail on Coil spring
        • 0.047% fail on Mounting
    • 2.4% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.38% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.28% fail on Linkage
      • 0.28% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (71% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.57% fail on Pins and bushes (56% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.095% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.71% fail on Other suspension component (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.095% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.52% fail on Shock absorbers (61% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.14% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.095% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.047% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.095% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.047% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.047% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.047% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 0.047% fail on Operation
  • 8.9% fail on Visibility (80% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Washers (99% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Wipers (76% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on View to rear
      • 0.19% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.14% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.047% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.047% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.047% fail on Windscreen
  • 8.7% fail on Brakes (22% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Mechanical brake components (60% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Brake linings and pads (50% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.7% fail on Brake pads (49% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.047% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.3% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.3% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.57% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.52% fail on Cable (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.047% fail on Lever
    • 3.2% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt
          • 0.85% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.28% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.047% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.047% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.43% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.43% fail on Rbt
          • 0.38% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.047% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.33% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.28% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.14% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.14% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.047% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.28% fail on Brake performance not tested (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.71% fail on Parking brake control (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.71% fail on Electronic parking brake (15 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.38% fail on Flexible brake hoses (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.38% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.33% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.24% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.28% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.24% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.047% fail on Master cylinder
    • 0.24% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.24% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.19% fail on Pedal
    • 0.047% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.047% fail on Servos
    • 0.047% fail on Rigid brake pipes
  • 8.7% fail on Body, chassis, structure (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.7% fail on Transmission (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 6.7% fail on Drive shafts (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 6.7% fail on Joints (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.047% fail on Joints
    • 0.52% fail on Exhaust system (62% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on Seats (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Passenger's seat (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Driver's seat (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.38% fail on Body (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Panel (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Other body component
    • 0.24% fail on Doors
      • 0.19% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.19% fail on Door condition
      • 0.047% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.047% fail on Door condition
    • 0.24% fail on Undertray (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.14% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.095% fail on System
      • 0.047% fail on Tank
    • 0.14% fail on Engine mounting (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.095% fail on Engine mounting condition
      • 0.047% fail on Bracket
    • 0.095% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.095% fail on Other boot lid component (38 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.047% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.047% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.047% fail on Sub-frame condition
  • 8.3% fail on Tyres (30% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Tread depth (44% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.33% fail on Size/type
  • 5.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Exhaust emissions (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.0% fail on Compression ignition (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 4.0% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.71% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.24% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.095% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.047% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 0.43% fail on Spark ignition (71% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.24% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (70% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Catalyst emissions (78% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.047% fail on Non catalyst emissions
    • 0.47% fail on Fluid leaks (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Engine oil leaks (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.095% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.047% fail on Transmission oil leaks
    • 0.047% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.047% fail on Undertray
  • 1.8% fail on Steering
    • 1.4% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.2% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.19% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.28% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.28% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.047% fail on Steering play
      • 0.047% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.85% fail on Road Wheels (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.76% fail on Attachment (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.095% fail on Condition
  • 0.47% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.24% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.19% fail on Condition
      • 0.047% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.24% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.43% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.43% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.047% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.047% fail on Belt(s)/padding

Search Good Garages