MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Citroen » Grand C4 Picasso » 2009

Citroen Grand C4 Picasso MOT Results

Registered in 2009
48.7% pass rate
from 2,041 tests in 2021
(29% worse than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen Grand C4 Picasso is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (72% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 9.0% fail on Stop lamp (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Headlamps (70% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.4% fail on Headlamp (78% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.049% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.73% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Direction indicators (48% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Flashing type (48% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.78% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.20% fail on Side repeaters (73% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.049% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.54% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.54% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.54% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.39% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.24% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.098% fail on Horn
      • 0.049% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.15% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.15% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.098% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.098% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.098% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 13% fail on Suspension
    • 5.5% fail on Springs
      • 5.5% fail on Coil springs
        • 5.5% fail on Coil spring
    • 4.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.0% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.3% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.24% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.7% fail on Anti-roll bars (30% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.49% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (61% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.098% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.098% fail on Ball joint dust cover (83% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.049% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.049% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.049% fail on Linkage
    • 0.83% fail on Other suspension component (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.69% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.049% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.049% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.049% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.49% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.34% fail on Shock absorbers (61% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Wheel bearings (65% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.049% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.049% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.049% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.049% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.049% fail on Ball joint
  • 12% fail on Body, chassis, structure (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 9.8% fail on Transmission (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 9.6% fail on Drive shafts (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 9.6% fail on Joints (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.24% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.88% fail on Exhaust system (55% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.54% fail on Seats (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Driver's seat (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Passenger's seat (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.34% fail on Integral vehicle structure (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.15% fail on Tank
      • 0.049% fail on Pipe
      • 0.049% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.049% fail on System
    • 0.29% fail on Body
      • 0.24% fail on Other body component
      • 0.049% fail on Panel
    • 0.20% fail on Chassis (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Chassis condition (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.098% fail on Bracket (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.049% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.098% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.049% fail on Boot lid condition
      • 0.049% fail on Other boot lid component
    • 0.098% fail on Undertray
    • 0.049% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.049% fail on Doors
      • 0.049% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.049% fail on Door condition
    • 0.049% fail on Cabs
      • 0.049% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.049% fail on Passenger compartment
  • 12% fail on Brakes (36% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Mechanical brake components (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Brake linings and pads (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 4.4% fail on Brake pads (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.049% fail on Brake linings
      • 2.0% fail on Brake discs and drums (70% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Brake discs (71% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.24% fail on Cable
        • 0.15% fail on Lever (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Brake performance (28% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (50% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 3.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (57% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.5% fail on Rbt
          • 2.3% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.44% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.2% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt
          • 0.98% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.098% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.098% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.098% fail on Parking brake performance (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.29% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.29% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.29% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.20% fail on Service brake performance
    • 0.73% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.49% fail on Electronic stability control (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.098% fail on Electronic braking system (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.64% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.64% fail on Electronic parking brake (14 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.54% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.098% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.44% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.44% fail on Pedal (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.15% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.049% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.049% fail on Valves
    • 0.098% fail on Rigid brake pipes (90% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.098% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.049% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.049% fail on Other components
  • 8.8% fail on Visibility (48% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Washers (56% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Wipers (46% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on View to rear
      • 0.15% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.098% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.098% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.098% fail on Windscreen
  • 8.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (95% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 8.2% fail on Exhaust emissions (97% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Compression ignition (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 4.3% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.39% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.20% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.049% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 2.1% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.73% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.15% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.39% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.34% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.049% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.049% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.049% fail on Undertray
  • 7.6% fail on Tyres (23% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Tread depth (59% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Condition
    • 0.098% fail on Size/type
  • 1.9% fail on Steering
    • 1.4% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.2% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.098% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.049% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.29% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.24% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.049% fail on Operation
    • 0.098% fail on Power steering
      • 0.098% fail on Operation
    • 0.098% fail on Steering play
      • 0.098% fail on Steering rack
  • 1.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.0% fail on Seat belts (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.73% fail on Prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Condition
    • 0.54% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.049% fail on Airbags
      • 0.049% fail on Passengers airbag
  • 1.2% fail on Road Wheels (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.39% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.39% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages