MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Citroen » Grand C4 Picasso » 2009

Citroen Grand C4 Picasso MOT Results

Registered in 2009
48.5% pass rate
from 2,544 tests in 2020
(39% worse than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen Grand C4 Picasso is unusually good or bad.

  • 28% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (98% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 11% fail on Stop lamp (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 8.2% fail on Position lamps (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 8.1% fail on Position lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on All position lamps
    • 7.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Headlamps (65% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.2% fail on Headlamp (71% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.039% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 4.8% fail on Headlamp aim (48% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Headlamp aim (51% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.0% fail on Direction indicators (43% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Flashing type (43% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.71% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.28% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.079% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.59% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.59% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.59% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.12% fail on Electrical equipment (73% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.039% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.039% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.039% fail on Horn
    • 0.079% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.079% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 12% fail on Brakes (48% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.3% fail on Mechanical brake components (96% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.0% fail on Brake linings and pads (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 5.0% fail on Brake pads (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Brake discs and drums (53% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Brake discs (51% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.039% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.47% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.47% fail on Cable (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Brake performance (34% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 3.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.039% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.28% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.079% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.039% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.039% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.83% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.83% fail on Rbt
          • 0.71% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.16% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.47% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.47% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.31% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.16% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.20% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.1% fail on Parking brake control (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Electronic parking brake (27 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.75% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.51% fail on Electronic stability control (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.039% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.63% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.47% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.47% fail on Pedal (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.079% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.079% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.16% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.039% fail on Rigid brake pipes
  • 11% fail on Suspension (15% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Springs
      • 4.9% fail on Coil springs
        • 4.9% fail on Coil spring
    • 2.6% fail on Suspension arms (36% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.90% fail on Pins and bushes (47% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.039% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 2.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (32% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.39% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (66% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint dust cover (70% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.079% fail on Linkage
    • 0.83% fail on Shock absorbers (43% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.83% fail on Other suspension component (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.039% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.39% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.24% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.12% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.079% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.039% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.16% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.079% fail on Suspension unit (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.079% fail on Bellows (61 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.039% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.039% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  • 10% fail on Body, chassis, structure (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 9.0% fail on Transmission (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 8.9% fail on Drive shafts (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 8.9% fail on Joints (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.039% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.12% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.12% fail on Joints
    • 0.79% fail on Exhaust system (53% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on Seats (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Driver's seat (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Passenger's seat (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Doors
      • 0.28% fail on Other passenger's door (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.24% fail on Door condition (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.079% fail on Catch (38 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.079% fail on System
      • 0.039% fail on Tank
      • 0.039% fail on Pipe
    • 0.039% fail on Chassis
      • 0.039% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.039% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.039% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.039% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.039% fail on Body
      • 0.039% fail on Other body component
    • 0.039% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.039% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 8.9% fail on Tyres (35% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.7% fail on Tread depth (73% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Condition
    • 0.31% fail on Size/type
  • 8.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 8.4% fail on Exhaust emissions (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 6.2% fail on Compression ignition (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 4.8% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.98% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.51% fail on Emissions not tested (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.039% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.039% fail on Particulate filter
        • 0.039% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.039% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 2.2% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.94% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.12% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.67% fail on Fluid leaks (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Engine oil leaks (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Other leaks (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.039% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.039% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
    • 0.079% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.079% fail on Undertray
      • 0.039% fail on Sound deadening material
  • 8.0% fail on Visibility (46% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Washers (74% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Wipers
    • 0.20% fail on View to rear
      • 0.20% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.16% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.12% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.079% fail on Windscreen
      • 0.039% fail on Window
    • 0.039% fail on Bonnet
  • 1.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.63% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.39% fail on Condition
      • 0.20% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.039% fail on Requirements
    • 0.39% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.039% fail on Airbags
      • 0.039% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.90% fail on Steering (53% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.71% fail on Steering linkage components (55% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Track rod end (62% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.039% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.16% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.16% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.079% fail on Power steering
      • 0.039% fail on Operation
      • 0.039% fail on Pump
  • 0.67% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.67% fail on Attachment (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.55% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.55% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages