Citroen Grand C4 Picasso MOT Results

Registered in 2009
51.3% pass rate
from 3,240 tests in 2017
(49% worse than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen Grand C4 Picasso is unusually good or bad.

  • 34% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 16% fail on Position lamps (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 16% fail on Front lamps (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Rear lamps (81% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.093% fail on All position lamps
    • 13% fail on Registration plate lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 11% fail on Stop lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 7.0% fail on Headlamp aim (76% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Headlamps (96% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.1% fail on Headlamp (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.031% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.031% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.031% fail on Matched pair
    • 0.59% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.56% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.031% fail on Switch
    • 0.37% fail on Direction indicators (76% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Flashing type (76% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Individual lamps (71% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Side repeaters (71% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.12% fail on Horn
    • 0.062% fail on Battery
    • 0.031% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.031% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 13% fail on Suspension (24% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.3% fail on Drive shafts (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Front drive shafts (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 6.3% fail on Constant velocity joints (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.031% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.031% fail on Drive shafts
    • 3.8% fail on Coil springs
      • 3.8% fail on Condition
    • 2.1% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.6% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.37% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.093% fail on Linkage condition
    • 1.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.86% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.86% fail on Condition
    • 0.65% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.25% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.12% fail on Front
      • 0.12% fail on Rear
    • 0.19% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.19% fail on Condition
    • 0.062% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.062% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 9.8% fail on Driver's view of the road (85% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Washers (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Wipers (65% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.68% fail on Windscreen (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Mirrors
  • 9.4% fail on Brakes (45% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Hub components (89% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Brake pads (92% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.99% fail on Brake discs (61% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Brake calipers (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.031% fail on Brake linings
    • 3.9% fail on Brake performance (36% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Parking brake performance (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.80% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.28% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.062% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.062% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.031% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.71% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.65% fail on Components
        • 0.28% fail on Hoses
        • 0.19% fail on Pipes (63% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Reservoirs (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.062% fail on Leaks
    • 0.59% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.59% fail on Electronic parking brake (17 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.46% fail on Service brake control components (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Pedal (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.43% fail on Anti-slip (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.031% fail on Condition
    • 0.19% fail on Mechanical components (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Cable (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.12% fail on ABS
    • 0.031% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.031% fail on Components
        • 0.031% fail on Servos
    • 0.031% fail on Restricted movement
  • 9.3% fail on Tyres (30% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Tread depth (61% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Condition
    • 0.19% fail on Size/type
    • 0.031% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
    • 0.031% fail on Valve stem
  • 1.7% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Seats (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Drivers (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Passengers (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.46% fail on Doors (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Passengers other (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Body condition
    • 0.031% fail on Load security
      • 0.031% fail on Bootlid
  • 1.3% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (36% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.59% fail on Emissions
    • 0.34% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.28% fail on System (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.031% fail on Tank
      • 0.031% fail on Cap
    • 0.22% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.19% fail on Exhaust system (86% better than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.96% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.59% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.59% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (84% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.28% fail on Condition
      • 0.062% fail on Attachment
      • 0.031% fail on Requirements
  • 0.65% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.65% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.52% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.49% fail on Attachment (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.031% fail on Condition
  • 0.37% fail on Steering (69% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.34% fail on Steering system (68% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Track rod end (68% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.093% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.031% fail on Steering operation
  • 0.031% fail on Towbars
    • 0.031% fail on Towbar

Search Good Garages