Citroen Grand C4 Picasso MOT Results
Registered in 200951.3% pass rate
from 3,240 tests in 2017
(49% worse than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen Grand C4 Picasso is unusually good or bad.
-
34% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(120% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
16% fail on
Position lamps
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 16% fail on Front lamps (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Rear lamps (81% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.093% fail on All position lamps
- 13% fail on Registration plate lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 11% fail on Stop lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 7.0% fail on Headlamp aim (76% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
5.2% fail on
Headlamps
(96% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 5.1% fail on Headlamp (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.031% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.031% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.031% fail on Matched pair
-
0.59% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.56% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.031% fail on Switch
-
0.37% fail on
Direction indicators
(76% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.37% fail on
Flashing type
(76% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Individual lamps (71% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Side repeaters (71% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.37% fail on
Flashing type
(76% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.12% fail on Horn
- 0.062% fail on Battery
- 0.031% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.031% fail on Rear reflectors
-
16% fail on
Position lamps
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
13% fail on
Suspension
(24% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
6.3% fail on
Drive shafts
(4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
6.3% fail on
Front drive shafts
(4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 6.3% fail on Constant velocity joints (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.031% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.031% fail on Drive shafts
-
6.3% fail on
Front drive shafts
(4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Coil springs
- 3.8% fail on Condition
-
2.1% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.6% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.37% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.093% fail on Linkage condition
-
1.3% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.86% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.86% fail on Condition
- 0.65% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.25% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.12% fail on Front
- 0.12% fail on Rear
-
0.19% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.19% fail on Condition
-
0.062% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.062% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
6.3% fail on
Drive shafts
(4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
9.8% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(85% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 4.8% fail on Washers (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 4.6% fail on Wipers (65% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.68% fail on Windscreen (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Mirrors
-
9.4% fail on
Brakes
(45% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
5.3% fail on
Hub components
(89% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 4.5% fail on Brake pads (92% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.99% fail on Brake discs (61% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Brake calipers (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.031% fail on Brake linings
-
3.9% fail on
Brake performance
(36% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Parking brake performance (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Rear wheels
- 0.80% fail on Front wheels
- 0.28% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.062% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.062% fail on Brake operation
- 0.031% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.71% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
0.65% fail on
Components
- 0.28% fail on Hoses
- 0.19% fail on Pipes (63% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Reservoirs (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.062% fail on Leaks
-
0.65% fail on
Components
-
0.59% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.59% fail on Electronic parking brake (17 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.46% fail on
Service brake control components
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.46% fail on
Pedal
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Anti-slip (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.031% fail on Condition
-
0.46% fail on
Pedal
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Mechanical components
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Cable (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Electronic stability system
- 0.12% fail on ABS
-
0.031% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
-
0.031% fail on
Components
- 0.031% fail on Servos
-
0.031% fail on
Components
- 0.031% fail on Restricted movement
-
5.3% fail on
Hub components
(89% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
9.3% fail on
Tyres
(30% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 6.1% fail on Tread depth (61% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Condition
- 0.19% fail on Size/type
- 0.031% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
- 0.031% fail on Valve stem
-
1.7% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Seats
(10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.74% fail on Drivers (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Passengers (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.46% fail on
Doors
(160% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.46% fail on Passengers other (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Body condition
-
0.031% fail on
Load security
- 0.031% fail on Bootlid
-
1.0% fail on
Seats
(10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(36% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.59% fail on Emissions
-
0.34% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.28% fail on System (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.031% fail on Tank
- 0.031% fail on Cap
- 0.22% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.19% fail on Exhaust system (86% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.96% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
0.59% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.59% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (84% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.37% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.28% fail on Condition
- 0.062% fail on Attachment
- 0.031% fail on Requirements
-
0.59% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
-
0.65% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.65% fail on Registration plate
-
0.52% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.49% fail on Attachment (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.031% fail on Condition
-
0.37% fail on
Steering
(69% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.34% fail on
Steering system
(68% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Track rod end (68% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.093% fail on Steering rack
- 0.031% fail on Steering operation
-
0.34% fail on
Steering system
(68% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.031% fail on
Towbars
- 0.031% fail on Towbar