Citroen Grand C4 Picasso MOT Results
Registered in 200852.0% pass rate
from 782 tests in 2017
(30% worse than other 2008 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen Grand C4 Picasso is unusually good or bad.
-
35% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(89% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
17% fail on
Position lamps
(2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 16% fail on Front lamps (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.51% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.13% fail on All position lamps
- 12% fail on Registration plate lamp (150% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 10% fail on Stop lamp (160% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 8.4% fail on Headlamp aim (78% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
4.7% fail on
Headlamps
(53% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 4.7% fail on Headlamp (60% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.2% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.7% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.38% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.13% fail on All direction indicators
-
2.2% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.26% fail on Battery
-
0.26% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.26% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.13% fail on Horn
- 0.13% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
17% fail on
Position lamps
(2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
14% fail on
Suspension
-
7.8% fail on
Drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
7.8% fail on
Front drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 7.8% fail on Constant velocity joints (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
7.8% fail on
Front drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Coil springs
(59% better than other 2008 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Condition (58% better than other 2008 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.64% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.13% fail on Condition
- 1.4% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.90% fail on
Suspension arms
(64% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.90% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (63% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.90% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.90% fail on Condition
-
0.51% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.38% fail on Rear
- 0.13% fail on Front
-
0.13% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.13% fail on Condition
- 0.13% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
-
7.8% fail on
Drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
13% fail on
Brakes
(59% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
6.3% fail on
Hub components
(110% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 5.6% fail on Brake pads (130% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Brake discs
- 0.13% fail on Brake calipers
-
4.6% fail on
Brake performance
- 2.0% fail on Rear wheels
- 2.0% fail on Parking brake performance
- 1.4% fail on Front wheels
- 0.13% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.13% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.13% fail on Brake operation
- 0.13% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
1.3% fail on
Parking brake
- 1.3% fail on Electronic parking brake (23 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.77% fail on
Mechanical components
(10 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.77% fail on Cable (12 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.77% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
0.64% fail on
Components
- 0.26% fail on Hoses
- 0.26% fail on Reservoirs (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Pipes
- 0.13% fail on Leaks
-
0.64% fail on
Components
- 0.64% fail on Electronic stability system (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.26% fail on ABS
- 0.26% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.13% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.13% fail on
Pedal
- 0.13% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.13% fail on
Pedal
-
6.3% fail on
Hub components
(110% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
9.3% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(60% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 4.9% fail on Washers (100% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Wipers
- 0.51% fail on Windscreen
- 0.13% fail on Mirrors
-
8.2% fail on
Tyres
- 5.2% fail on Tread depth
- 2.9% fail on Condition
- 0.26% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
- 0.13% fail on Size/type
-
4.0% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 2.9% fail on Emissions (180% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Exhaust system (78% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.38% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.26% fail on System
- 0.13% fail on Cap
- 0.38% fail on Emissions not tested
-
1.3% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
0.77% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.77% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
0.51% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.51% fail on Condition
-
0.77% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
-
1.3% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
0.64% fail on
Seats
(5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Passengers (8 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Drivers
-
0.38% fail on
Doors
- 0.38% fail on Passengers other
- 0.13% fail on Engine mountings
- 0.13% fail on Body condition
-
0.64% fail on
Seats
(5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.77% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.77% fail on Registration plate
-
0.64% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.64% fail on Attachment
-
0.38% fail on
Steering
(76% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.38% fail on
Steering system
(73% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Ball joint
- 0.13% fail on Track rod end
-
0.38% fail on
Steering system
(73% better than other 2008 cars)