Citroen Grand C4 Picasso MOT Results

Registered in 2008

47.5% pass rate

from 451 tests in 2021

(24% worse than other 2008 cars)

Pass rate by mileage

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen Grand C4 Picasso is unusually good or bad.

20% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (45% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 9.5% fail on Stop lamp (150% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 5.3% fail on Headlamps
  - 5.3% fail on Headlamp
- 5.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (150% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Direction indicators
  - 3.8% fail on Flashing type
    - 2.9% fail on Individual direction indicators (110% worse than other 2008 cars)
    - 0.89% fail on Side repeaters
- 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 0.22% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.22% fail on Rear reflectors
- 0.22% fail on Electrical equipment
  - 0.22% fail on Horn
16% fail on Suspension
- 6.0% fail on Springs
  - 6.0% fail on Coil springs
    - 6.0% fail on Coil spring
    - 0.22% fail on Mounting
- 5.8% fail on Suspension arms
  - 4.2% fail on Ball joint (110% worse than other 2008 cars)
  - 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 0.67% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 4.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
  - 3.1% fail on Linkage ball joints (130% worse than other 2008 cars)
  - 0.67% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  - 0.44% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 1.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 0.89% fail on Other suspension component
  - 0.67% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
  - 0.22% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.44% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.44% fail on Sub-frames
  - 0.22% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  - 0.22% fail on Ball joint
- 0.22% fail on Shock absorbers
14% fail on Brakes (37% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 6.4% fail on Brake performance
  - 4.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (83% worse than other 2008 cars)
    - 4.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (92% worse than other 2008 cars)
  - 2.2% fail on Parking brake performance
    - 2.2% fail on Rbt
      - 1.8% fail on Parking brake performance
      - 0.44% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
  - 1.8% fail on Service brake performance
    - 1.8% fail on Rbt
      - 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
      - 0.89% fail on Service brake imbalance
  - 0.44% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
    - 0.44% fail on Rbt (sp)
      - 0.44% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 5.5% fail on Mechanical brake components (75% worse than other 2008 cars)
  - 4.9% fail on Brake linings and pads (120% worse than other 2008 cars)
    - 4.9% fail on Brake pads (130% worse than other 2008 cars)
  - 0.89% fail on Brake discs and drums
    - 0.89% fail on Brake discs
  - 0.44% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
    - 0.44% fail on Cable
- 1.3% fail on Parking brake control
  - 1.3% fail on Electronic parking brake (20 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.3% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
  - 0.89% fail on Electronic stability control
  - 0.67% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  - 0.22% fail on Electronic braking system
- 0.89% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
  - 0.89% fail on Pedal (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.89% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
  - 0.89% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Flexible brake hoses
- 0.22% fail on Hydraulic systems
  - 0.22% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.22% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
  - 0.22% fail on Other components
13% fail on Body, chassis, structure (110% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 9.5% fail on Transmission (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
  - 9.3% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    - 9.3% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
  - 0.22% fail on Prop shafts
    - 0.22% fail on Joints
- 1.1% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.67% fail on Doors
  - 0.44% fail on Other passenger's door
    - 0.44% fail on Door condition
  - 0.22% fail on Front passenger's door
    - 0.22% fail on Door condition
- 0.44% fail on Integral vehicle structure
  - 0.44% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
- 0.44% fail on Chassis
  - 0.44% fail on Chassis condition
- 0.44% fail on Bumpers
- 0.44% fail on Body
  - 0.44% fail on Other body component
- 0.44% fail on Seats
  - 0.22% fail on Driver's seat
  - 0.22% fail on Passenger's seat
- 0.22% fail on Floor
- 0.22% fail on Undertray
11% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (110% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 11% fail on Exhaust emissions (120% worse than other 2008 cars)
  - 5.8% fail on Spark ignition
    - 3.8% fail on Catalyst emissions (120% worse than other 2008 cars)
    - 2.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    - 0.89% fail on Emissions not tested
  - 5.3% fail on Compression ignition (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    - 2.9% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    - 1.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    - 0.67% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
    - 0.44% fail on Emissions not tested
    - 0.22% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
- 0.89% fail on Fluid leaks
  - 0.89% fail on Engine oil leaks
8.6% fail on Visibility
- 5.8% fail on Washers (79% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Wipers
- 0.44% fail on Bonnet
- 0.22% fail on Condition of glass
  - 0.22% fail on Windscreen
8.6% fail on Tyres
- 5.3% fail on Tread depth
- 4.2% fail on Condition
2.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 2.9% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
  - 2.0% fail on Prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
  - 0.67% fail on Condition
  - 0.22% fail on Requirements
1.8% fail on Steering
- 1.8% fail on Steering linkage components
  - 1.8% fail on Track rod end
0.89% fail on Identification of the vehicle
- 0.89% fail on Registration plates