Citroen Grand C4 Picasso MOT Results

Registered in 2008
52.0% pass rate
from 782 tests in 2017
(30% worse than other 2008 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen Grand C4 Picasso is unusually good or bad.

  • 35% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (89% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 17% fail on Position lamps (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 16% fail on Front lamps (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.13% fail on All position lamps
    • 12% fail on Registration plate lamp (150% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 10% fail on Stop lamp (160% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 8.4% fail on Headlamp aim (78% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Headlamps (53% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 4.7% fail on Headlamp (60% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.7% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.38% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.13% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.26% fail on Battery
    • 0.26% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.26% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.13% fail on Horn
    • 0.13% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 14% fail on Suspension
    • 7.8% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 7.8% fail on Front drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 7.8% fail on Constant velocity joints (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Coil springs (59% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Condition (58% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.64% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.13% fail on Condition
    • 1.4% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.90% fail on Suspension arms (64% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.90% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (63% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.90% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.90% fail on Condition
    • 0.51% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.38% fail on Rear
      • 0.13% fail on Front
    • 0.13% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.13% fail on Condition
    • 0.13% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 13% fail on Brakes (59% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 6.3% fail on Hub components (110% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 5.6% fail on Brake pads (130% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.13% fail on Brake calipers
    • 4.6% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.0% fail on Rear wheels
      • 2.0% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.4% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.13% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.13% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.13% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.13% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.3% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.3% fail on Electronic parking brake (23 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.77% fail on Mechanical components (10 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.77% fail on Cable (12 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.77% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.64% fail on Components
        • 0.26% fail on Hoses
        • 0.26% fail on Reservoirs (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Pipes
      • 0.13% fail on Leaks
    • 0.64% fail on Electronic stability system (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on ABS
    • 0.26% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.13% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.13% fail on Pedal
        • 0.13% fail on Anti-slip
  • 9.3% fail on Driver's view of the road (60% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Washers (100% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Wipers
    • 0.51% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.13% fail on Mirrors
  • 8.2% fail on Tyres
    • 5.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.9% fail on Condition
    • 0.26% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
    • 0.13% fail on Size/type
  • 4.0% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 2.9% fail on Emissions (180% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.38% fail on Exhaust system (78% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.38% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.26% fail on System
      • 0.13% fail on Cap
    • 0.38% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 1.3% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.77% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.77% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
    • 0.51% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.51% fail on Condition
  • 1.3% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.64% fail on Seats (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Passengers (8 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Drivers
    • 0.38% fail on Doors
      • 0.38% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.13% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.13% fail on Body condition
  • 0.77% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.77% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.64% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.64% fail on Attachment
  • 0.38% fail on Steering (76% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.38% fail on Steering system (73% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.13% fail on Track rod end

Search Good Garages