Citroen Dyane MOT Results

Registered in 1982
65.6% pass rate
from 61 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1982 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen Dyane is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 8.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 8.2% fail on Headlamp
    • 8.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 6.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 8.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 8.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 8.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 4.9% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 3.3% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 3.3% fail on Horn
    • 3.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.3% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 1.6% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
  • 15% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.9% fail on Transmission
      • 4.9% fail on Drive shafts
        • 4.9% fail on Joints
    • 3.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.3% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.6% fail on Pipe
      • 1.6% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 3.3% fail on Doors (7 times worse than other 1982 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Driver's door (21 times worse than other 1982 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Door condition
        • 1.6% fail on Catch
      • 1.6% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 1.6% fail on Door condition
    • 1.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.6% fail on Body
      • 1.6% fail on Panel
  • 13% fail on Visibility
    • 8.2% fail on Wipers (2 times worse than other 1982 cars)
    • 8.2% fail on Washers
    • 3.3% fail on View to rear (12 times worse than other 1982 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Mirrors (12 times worse than other 1982 cars)
  • 8.2% fail on Suspension
    • 4.9% fail on Axles (9 times worse than other 1982 cars)
      • 4.9% fail on King pins (25 times worse than other 1982 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 6.6% fail on Brakes
    • 4.9% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.9% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 3.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 1.6% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.6% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
    • 1.6% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 1.6% fail on Pedal
    • 1.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes
  • 6.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 6.6% fail on Seat belts
      • 6.6% fail on Prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 1982 cars)
  • 4.9% fail on Steering
    • 3.3% fail on Steering column (38 times worse than other 1982 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.6% fail on Track rod end
  • 3.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.3% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.3% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.6% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 1.6% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 3.3% fail on Tyres
    • 1.6% fail on Size/type
    • 1.6% fail on Tread depth

Search Good Garages