Citroen C8 MOT Results
Registered in 200645.4% pass rate
from 452 tests in 2021
(27% worse than other 2006 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2006 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen C8 is unusually good or bad.
-
25% fail on
Suspension
(48% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
8.6% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(69% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (100% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 1.8% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.66% fail on Ball joint
- 0.44% fail on Linkage
- 0.22% fail on Anti-roll bar
-
8.0% fail on
Suspension arms
- 5.5% fail on Ball joint (160% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Ball joint dust cover (150% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Pins and bushes (83% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Suspension arm
-
6.6% fail on
Springs
-
6.4% fail on
Coil springs
- 6.4% fail on Coil spring
- 0.22% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
6.4% fail on
Coil springs
- 6.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
0.88% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.88% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.44% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.22% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.22% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 0.22% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.22% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.22% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.22% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.22% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
8.6% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(69% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
21% fail on
Brakes
(69% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
16% fail on
Brake performance
(140% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
12% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 12% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
6.4% fail on
Parking brake performance
(3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
6.2% fail on
Rbt
(3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 5.8% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.22% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.22% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
6.2% fail on
Rbt
(3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.9% fail on
Rbt
- 2.4% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.44% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
2.9% fail on
Rbt
- 0.88% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.88% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.88% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.66% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.66% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.88% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
12% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
4.0% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
3.1% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 3.1% fail on Brake pads
-
0.88% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
(3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.66% fail on Cable
- 0.22% fail on Lever
-
0.44% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.44% fail on Brake discs
-
3.1% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
0.88% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.88% fail on Lever
-
0.66% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.66% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.44% fail on Electronic stability control
-
0.44% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.44% fail on Pedal
-
0.44% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.44% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.44% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.44% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.22% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
- 0.22% fail on Other components
-
16% fail on
Brake performance
(140% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
20% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(30% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 11% fail on Stop lamp (160% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
6.4% fail on
Headlamps
- 6.2% fail on Headlamp
- 0.22% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
2.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.44% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 2.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.5% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.5% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 0.22% fail on Switch
-
1.5% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
1.3% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.3% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.3% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
1.3% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.22% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.22% fail on Horn
-
15% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(99% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 5.5% fail on Exhaust system (100% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
5.1% fail on
Transmission
-
4.4% fail on
Drive shafts
- 4.2% fail on Joints
- 0.22% fail on Drive shaft
-
0.66% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.66% fail on Joints (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Drive shafts
-
3.3% fail on
Doors
(6 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Other passenger's door
(11 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Door condition (11 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.22% fail on Hinge
-
3.1% fail on
Other passenger's door
(11 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
0.44% fail on
Chassis
- 0.44% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.22% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.22% fail on Pipe
-
0.22% fail on
Spare wheel
- 0.22% fail on Spare wheel condition
-
0.22% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.22% fail on Engine mounting condition
-
0.22% fail on
Body
- 0.22% fail on Panel
-
0.22% fail on
Seats
- 0.22% fail on Passenger's seat
- 0.22% fail on Undertray
-
8.6% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
8.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
4.2% fail on
Spark ignition
- 2.2% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 1.8% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.44% fail on
Emission control equipment
(9 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Other emission control equipment (149 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
4.0% fail on
Compression ignition
(190% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.66% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.66% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.22% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
4.2% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.44% fail on
Noise suppression
(14 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Undertray (20 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
8.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
8.4% fail on
Visibility
- 4.2% fail on Wipers
- 4.0% fail on Washers
-
0.44% fail on
View to rear
- 0.44% fail on Mirrors
-
0.22% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.22% fail on Windscreen
-
6.6% fail on
Tyres
- 3.5% fail on Tread depth
- 3.3% fail on Condition
-
3.1% fail on
Steering
-
1.8% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 1.8% fail on Track rod end
-
0.66% fail on
Power steering
- 0.44% fail on Operation
- 0.22% fail on Pipes and hoses
-
0.44% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.44% fail on Steering rack
- 0.22% fail on Steering column
-
1.8% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
2.9% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
2.2% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.8% fail on Prescribed areas (200% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.66% fail on Condition
- 0.66% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
2.2% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.66% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.66% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review
-
Citroen C8 (2003 - 2010)
Seating for up to eight in a practical, versatile cabin. Plenty of safety and comfort features. Five-star crash rating from 2003. Easy to drive.