Citroen C5 MOT Results
Registered in 201163.7% pass rate
from 788 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2011 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen C5 is unusually good or bad.
-
14% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(33% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 5.6% fail on Stop lamp (130% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.8% fail on Headlamp
-
2.8% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.51% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 2.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.6% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.6% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.3% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.38% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.13% fail on All direction indicators
-
1.6% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.38% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.38% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.38% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.38% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.38% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.13% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.13% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.13% fail on Horn
-
0.13% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.13% fail on Position lamp
-
0.13% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.13% fail on Reversing lamps
-
9.8% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
9.4% fail on
Transmission
(6 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
9.1% fail on
Drive shafts
(6 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 9.0% fail on Joints (6 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Flexible couplings
-
0.25% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.25% fail on Joints (5 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
9.1% fail on
Drive shafts
(6 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Exhaust system (80% better than other 2011 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Engine mounting
(9 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Engine mounting condition (13 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.13% fail on System
-
9.4% fail on
Transmission
(6 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
9.1% fail on
Suspension
-
4.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(95% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Linkage ball joints (2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.25% fail on Linkage
- 0.25% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.13% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
-
2.4% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.6% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.76% fail on Ball joint
- 0.13% fail on Suspension arm
- 1.0% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.63% fail on
Springs
(86% better than other 2011 cars)
-
0.63% fail on
Coil springs
(86% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.63% fail on Coil spring (86% better than other 2011 cars)
-
0.63% fail on
Coil springs
(86% better than other 2011 cars)
-
0.51% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.38% fail on Pins and bushes (8 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Ball joint
-
0.38% fail on
Air/gas/fluid suspension
(37 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Pipes (223 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Suspension unit
- 0.25% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.13% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.13% fail on Sub-frame
-
4.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(95% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
6.0% fail on
Brakes
-
2.8% fail on
Brake performance
-
1.9% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.8% fail on
Rbt
- 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.38% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.13% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.13% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
1.8% fail on
Rbt
-
0.63% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.63% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.38% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.25% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.63% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.63% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.63% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
0.13% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.13% fail on
Rbt
- 0.13% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.13% fail on
Rbt
-
1.9% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.4% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.0% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.8% fail on Brake pads
- 0.25% fail on Brake linings (14 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
0.51% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.51% fail on Brake discs
-
0.13% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.13% fail on Cable
-
2.0% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.76% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.51% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.38% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
0.38% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.25% fail on Hand lever
- 0.13% fail on Pedal
-
0.25% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.25% fail on Brake fluid
-
2.8% fail on
Brake performance
-
6.0% fail on
Tyres
- 3.8% fail on Tread depth
- 2.4% fail on Condition
- 0.25% fail on Size/type
-
5.5% fail on
Steering
(190% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Power steering
(36 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Operation (36 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Other components (85 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Pipes and hoses (20 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 1.6% fail on Track rod end
- 0.13% fail on Drag link end
-
0.13% fail on
Other components
- 0.13% fail on Steering linkage
-
1.5% fail on
Steering gear
(6 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Steering rack (5 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Operation
- 0.13% fail on Steering box
-
2.5% fail on
Power steering
(36 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Visibility
- 2.2% fail on Washers
- 1.4% fail on Wipers
-
0.25% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.25% fail on Windscreen
- 0.13% fail on Bonnet
-
2.7% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
2.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
1.4% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.89% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.38% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
- 0.38% fail on Emissions not tested
-
1.0% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.89% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.13% fail on Catalyst emissions
-
1.4% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.51% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.38% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.13% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
-
2.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.63% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.51% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.51% fail on Condition
- 0.13% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.51% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.51% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.51% fail on Registration plates
-
0.51% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.51% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review
-
Citroen C5 (2008 - 2016)
Very comfortable. Fantastic refinement. Well equipped from mid-range models upwards.