Citroen C4 MOT Results
Registered in 201059.6% pass rate
from 3,255 tests in 2017
(37% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen C4 is unusually good or bad.
-
26% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(93% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 9.2% fail on Stop lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 7.4% fail on Headlamp aim (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
7.0% fail on
Position lamps
(140% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 5.3% fail on Front lamps (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Rear lamps (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.031% fail on All position lamps
- 6.3% fail on Registration plate lamp (74% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
5.1% fail on
Headlamps
(120% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 5.0% fail on Headlamp (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.061% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.061% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
-
0.031% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
- 0.031% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
-
2.6% fail on
Direction indicators
(74% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Flashing type
(74% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Individual lamps (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.25% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.092% fail on Side repeaters (83% better than other 2010 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Flashing type
(74% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.61% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.61% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.15% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.12% fail on Horn
- 0.061% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.061% fail on Rear reflectors
- 0.031% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
10% fail on
Suspension
(26% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
3.5% fail on
Drive shafts
(3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
3.5% fail on
Front drive shafts
(3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Constant velocity joints (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
3.5% fail on
Front drive shafts
(3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Coil springs
- 3.2% fail on Condition
-
2.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(76% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (88% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.031% fail on Linkage condition
-
0.71% fail on
Wheel bearings
(120% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Front (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Rear
-
0.49% fail on
Suspension arms
(62% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (61% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Tie bars/rods
(4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Shock absorbers
(83% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Condition (83% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.092% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.092% fail on Condition
-
0.061% fail on
Air suspension
(13 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.061% fail on Suspension unit (30 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.031% fail on
Bonded suspension
- 0.031% fail on Condition
-
0.031% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.031% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
3.5% fail on
Drive shafts
(3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
8.0% fail on
Tyres
(18% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 5.7% fail on Tread depth (63% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Condition
- 0.15% fail on Valve stem
- 0.092% fail on Size/type
-
7.4% fail on
Brakes
(33% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
4.2% fail on
Hub components
(53% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Brake pads (58% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Brake discs
- 0.031% fail on Brake linings
-
2.7% fail on
Brake performance
- 1.6% fail on Rear wheels (57% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Front wheels
- 0.52% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.18% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.092% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 0.061% fail on Brake operation
-
0.43% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
0.37% fail on
Components
- 0.25% fail on Hoses
- 0.061% fail on Pipes (79% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.061% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.031% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.031% fail on Leaks
-
0.37% fail on
Components
- 0.40% fail on ABS
- 0.28% fail on Restricted movement (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.15% fail on Electronic parking brake (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.061% fail on Condition (81% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.15% fail on
Pedal
- 0.15% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.15% fail on
Pedal
- 0.061% fail on Electronic stability system
-
4.2% fail on
Hub components
(53% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
6.3% fail on
Steering
(5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
6.1% fail on
Steering system
(5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Track rod end (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Steering rack (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.77% fail on Steering arm (41 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Ball joint (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.58% fail on
Free play
(30 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Steering rack (30 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Drag link end (15 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.031% fail on
Other components
- 0.031% fail on Steering pivot point
-
0.12% fail on
Power steering
- 0.061% fail on Operation
- 0.061% fail on Pump (30 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.061% fail on Steering operation
-
0.031% fail on
Steering control
- 0.031% fail on Steering wheel
-
6.1% fail on
Steering system
(5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
4.8% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 3.0% fail on Washers (65% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Wipers (50% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Windscreen
- 0.12% fail on Mirrors
- 0.061% fail on Bonnet
-
0.92% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 0.37% fail on Exhaust system (61% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Emissions
-
0.25% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.25% fail on System (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.061% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.74% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
0.49% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.49% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (94% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.18% fail on Condition
- 0.092% fail on Requirements (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.49% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
-
0.52% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.52% fail on Registration plate
-
0.18% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.15% fail on Attachment
- 0.031% fail on Condition
-
0.15% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
0.092% fail on
Doors
- 0.061% fail on Passengers front
- 0.031% fail on Drivers
- 0.031% fail on Engine mountings
- 0.031% fail on Body condition
-
0.092% fail on
Doors
Read the Honest John Review
-
Citroen C4 (2004 - 2010)
Brave styling, decent quality interior and excellent crash test ratings. 1.6 HDi EGS qualifies for £30pa tax. Good compromise between ride and handling