Citroen C4 MOT Results
Registered in 200849.7% pass rate
from 15,366 tests in 2021
(20% worse than other 2008 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen C4 is unusually good or bad.
-
21% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(57% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 9.6% fail on Stop lamp (150% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
5.3% fail on
Headlamps
(48% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 5.3% fail on Headlamp (54% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.052% fail on Headlamp levelling device (73% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Dipswitch
- 4.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (110% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
4.0% fail on
Headlamp aim
(13% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.57% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (58% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Direction indicators
(18% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Flashing type
(18% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Individual direction indicators (57% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Side repeaters (53% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.091% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.0065% fail on Switch
-
2.5% fail on
Flashing type
(18% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.79% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.79% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.79% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.79% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.43% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.18% fail on Horn
- 0.17% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.059% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.026% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
0.23% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.20% fail on Position lamp
- 0.020% fail on All position lamps
- 0.013% fail on Switch
- 0.046% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.026% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.026% fail on Main beam tell-tale
- 0.026% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
0.020% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.020% fail on Switch
-
0.0065% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.0065% fail on Reversing lamps
-
15% fail on
Suspension
-
6.2% fail on
Springs
-
6.2% fail on
Coil springs
- 6.2% fail on Coil spring
- 0.078% fail on Mounting
-
6.2% fail on
Coil springs
-
4.5% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 2.2% fail on Linkage ball joints (64% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.98% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (32% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.68% fail on Ball joint (61% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.46% fail on Ball joint dust cover (28% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.085% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (49% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.078% fail on Linkage (66% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.033% fail on Pins and bushes (71% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.026% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.013% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
4.0% fail on
Suspension arms
(19% better than other 2008 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Ball joint
- 1.6% fail on Pins and bushes (29% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Ball joint dust cover (43% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Suspension arm (91% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.0065% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.92% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (34% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.76% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.68% fail on
Other suspension component
(120% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Ball joint dust cover (95% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.033% fail on Other suspension component
- 0.020% fail on Pins and bushes (73% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.57% fail on Shock absorbers (43% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.35% fail on
Macpherson strut
(62% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (130% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.033% fail on Macpherson strut
- 0.020% fail on Ball joint
- 0.0065% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.11% fail on
Air/gas/fluid suspension
(4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.046% fail on Operation (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.039% fail on Bellows (24 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Suspension unit
- 0.0065% fail on Levelling valve
-
0.085% fail on
Sub-frames
(81% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.065% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 0.013% fail on Ball joint
- 0.0065% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.065% fail on
Axles
(68% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.065% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (64% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.065% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.039% fail on Ball joint
- 0.013% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.0065% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.0065% fail on Pins and bushes
-
6.2% fail on
Springs
-
13% fail on
Brakes
(25% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
6.2% fail on
Brake performance
(18% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
4.0% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(56% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 4.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (63% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (81% better than other 2008 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Service brake performance
(15% better than other 2008 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Rbt
(14% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.43% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.013% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.013% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.0065% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.0065% fail on Service brake performance
-
2.2% fail on
Rbt
(14% better than other 2008 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Parking brake performance
(37% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Rbt
(39% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance (41% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.026% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.039% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.020% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.013% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.0065% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.013% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.013% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
1.5% fail on
Rbt
(39% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.40% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(40% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.39% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(40% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Service brake imbalance (45% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.0065% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
0.39% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(40% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
4.0% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(56% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
5.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(63% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(74% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Brake pads (74% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.033% fail on Brake linings
-
1.6% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(35% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Brake discs (36% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.55% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
(2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.48% fail on Cable (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.065% fail on Lever
- 0.013% fail on Linkage
- 0.0065% fail on Pivot
-
3.8% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(74% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(120% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Anti-lock braking system (81% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Electronic stability control (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Electronic braking system (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.80% fail on
Parking brake control
(76% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.75% fail on Electronic parking brake (11 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.052% fail on Lever (87% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.48% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
(170% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.033% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
0.46% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.43% fail on Pedal (180% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.026% fail on Hand lever (89% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Flexible brake hoses (69% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.13% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.039% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.013% fail on Valves
- 0.10% fail on Rigid brake pipes (93% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.020% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
- 0.020% fail on Other components
-
0.0065% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.0065% fail on Servos
- 0.0065% fail on Load sensing valves
-
6.2% fail on
Brake performance
(18% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
12% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(90% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
9.2% fail on
Transmission
(2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
8.9% fail on
Drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 8.9% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.013% fail on Flexible couplings
- 0.0065% fail on Bearing housing
-
0.28% fail on
Prop shafts
(130% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
8.9% fail on
Drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Exhaust system (53% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.72% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(190% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.72% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.013% fail on
Sub-frame
- 0.0065% fail on Sub-frame condition
- 0.0065% fail on Strengthening plate
-
0.35% fail on
Seats
(200% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Driver's seat (180% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Passenger's seat (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.31% fail on
Chassis
(160% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Chassis condition (160% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Doors
(41% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.18% fail on Door condition
-
0.033% fail on
Front passenger's door
(74% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.026% fail on Door condition (79% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.0065% fail on Catch
-
0.020% fail on
Driver's door
(81% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.013% fail on Door condition (86% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.0065% fail on Pillar
-
0.18% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
0.21% fail on
Body
- 0.12% fail on Other body component
- 0.085% fail on Panel (110% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.0065% fail on Body condition
- 0.16% fail on Bumpers
-
0.14% fail on
Engine mounting
(150% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.098% fail on Engine mounting condition (120% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.046% fail on Bracket (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.10% fail on
Boot lid
(2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.059% fail on Boot lid condition
- 0.046% fail on Other boot lid component (9 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.085% fail on
Fuel system
(68% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.039% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (73% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.033% fail on Tank
- 0.0065% fail on Pipe
- 0.0065% fail on System
-
0.052% fail on
Cabs
(4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.052% fail on Prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.046% fail on Undertray
-
0.013% fail on
Towbar
- 0.0065% fail on Towbar condition
- 0.0065% fail on Other towbar components
-
0.013% fail on
Load security
-
0.013% fail on
Tailgate
- 0.0065% fail on Tailgate condition
- 0.0065% fail on Other tailgate component
-
0.013% fail on
Tailgate
- 0.013% fail on Floor
- 0.013% fail on Passenger compartment (7 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.0065% fail on
Spare wheel
- 0.0065% fail on Spare wheel condition
-
9.2% fail on
Transmission
(2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
8.2% fail on
Visibility
(31% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 5.1% fail on Washers (57% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Wipers
-
0.20% fail on
Condition of glass
(72% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Windscreen (77% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
View to rear
- 0.20% fail on Mirrors
- 0.0065% fail on Indirect vision devices
- 0.16% fail on Bonnet
- 0.0065% fail on Driver's view
-
8.0% fail on
Tyres
(22% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 5.3% fail on Tread depth (43% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Condition
- 0.31% fail on Size/type
-
6.7% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(23% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
6.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(23% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Compression ignition
(140% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.3% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (180% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (92% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Emissions not tested (98% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.085% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
0.039% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.033% fail on Other emission control equipment (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.0065% fail on Particulate filter
- 0.0065% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
-
2.6% fail on
Spark ignition
(28% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.84% fail on Catalyst emissions (52% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Emissions not tested (77% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.013% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.0065% fail on Particulate filter
- 0.0065% fail on Oxygen sensor
-
3.8% fail on
Compression ignition
(140% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.48% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.44% fail on Engine oil leaks (46% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Transmission oil leaks
- 0.020% fail on Other leaks
- 0.0065% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
-
0.039% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.039% fail on Undertray
-
6.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(23% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
4.2% fail on
Steering
(56% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
3.0% fail on
Steering linkage components
(47% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Track rod end (45% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Ball joint (110% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.059% fail on Drag link end
- 0.020% fail on Steering arm
-
0.0065% fail on
Other components
- 0.0065% fail on Steering linkage
-
0.0065% fail on
Rear wheel steering
- 0.0065% fail on Components
-
1.1% fail on
Steering gear
(140% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Steering rack (140% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.052% fail on Operation (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Power steering
(53% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Operation (110% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.072% fail on Pump (11 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.039% fail on Other components
- 0.020% fail on Pipes and hoses
-
0.10% fail on
Steering play
- 0.10% fail on Steering rack
- 0.033% fail on Electronic power steering
-
3.0% fail on
Steering linkage components
(47% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(42% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Seat belts
(92% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.95% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Condition
- 0.072% fail on Requirements (170% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.0065% fail on Attachment
- 0.77% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.020% fail on
Airbags
- 0.013% fail on Drivers airbag
- 0.0065% fail on Passengers airbag
-
1.5% fail on
Seat belts
(92% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.51% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.49% fail on Attachment
- 0.020% fail on Condition (85% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.46% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.46% fail on Registration plates
-
0.0065% fail on
Speedometer and speed limiter
- 0.0065% fail on Speedometer
-
0.0065% fail on
Buses and coaches supplementary tests
-
0.0065% fail on
Doors
- 0.0065% fail on Passenger entrance/exit doors
-
0.0065% fail on
Doors
-
0.0065% fail on
Seat belt installation check
- 0.0065% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review
-
Citroen C4 (2004 - 2010)
Brave styling, decent quality interior and excellent crash test ratings. 1.6 HDi EGS qualifies for £30pa tax. Good compromise between ride and handling