Citroen C4 Picasso MOT Results
Registered in 201681.7% pass rate
from 1,648 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen C4 Picasso is unusually good or bad.
-
4.7% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(35% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Headlamp aim
(84% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim (83% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 1.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.61% fail on
Headlamps
- 0.61% fail on Headlamp
-
0.55% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.55% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.55% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.55% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.12% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.12% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.12% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.12% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.061% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.061% fail on Position lamp
- 0.061% fail on Stop lamp
- 0.061% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.061% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.061% fail on Horn
-
2.6% fail on
Headlamp aim
(84% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
4.6% fail on
Suspension
(120% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(17 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Linkage ball joints (34 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.73% fail on Ball joint (32 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.061% fail on Linkage
- 0.061% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.061% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.67% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.49% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.18% fail on Ball joint
-
0.30% fail on
Springs
(73% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.30% fail on
Coil springs
(73% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Coil spring (73% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.30% fail on
Coil springs
(73% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.061% fail on Wheel bearings
-
3.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(17 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
4.2% fail on
Tyres
- 3.2% fail on Condition (50% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Tread depth
- 0.061% fail on Size/type
-
3.3% fail on
Brakes
-
2.7% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.1% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.1% fail on Brake pads
-
0.91% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.91% fail on Brake discs
-
2.1% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.79% fail on
Brake performance
-
0.67% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.67% fail on
Rbt
- 0.67% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.67% fail on
Rbt
-
0.061% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.061% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.061% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.061% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.061% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.061% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
0.67% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.061% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.061% fail on Pedal
- 0.061% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
0.061% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.061% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.061% fail on Electronic stability control
-
2.7% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.0% fail on
Visibility
(49% better than other 2016 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Washers
- 0.61% fail on Wipers (79% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.12% fail on Windscreen
-
1.3% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(130% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.97% fail on
Transmission
(3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.97% fail on
Drive shafts
(3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.91% fail on Joints (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.061% fail on Drive shaft
-
0.97% fail on
Drive shafts
(3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Seats
(7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Driver's seat (12 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.061% fail on Bumpers
-
0.061% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.061% fail on Other boot lid component
-
0.97% fail on
Transmission
(3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.49% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 0.42% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.061% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.061% fail on Condition
-
0.24% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.24% fail on Registration plates
-
0.24% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.24% fail on Attachment
-
0.18% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(78% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(85% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.061% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.061% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.061% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.061% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.061% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.061% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.061% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
0.12% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(85% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Steering
-
0.12% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.061% fail on Drag link end
- 0.061% fail on Track rod end
-
0.12% fail on
Steering linkage components