Citroen C4 Cactus MOT Results

Registered in 2016
80.3% pass rate
from 3,278 tests in 2020
(59% worse than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen C4 Cactus is unusually good or bad.

  • 6.9% fail on Visibility (140% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Wipers (150% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Washers (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.092% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.031% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.031% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.031% fail on Windscreen
  • 6.3% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (78% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim (83% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim (76% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Headlamps (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.98% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.34% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.34% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.31% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.031% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.31% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.092% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.092% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.092% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.031% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.031% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.031% fail on Daytime running lamps
    • 0.031% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.031% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 4.0% fail on Tyres
    • 2.5% fail on Tread depth (45% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Condition
    • 0.12% fail on Size/type
  • 3.9% fail on Brakes (94% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Mechanical brake components (100% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Brake linings and pads (97% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 2.6% fail on Brake pads (99% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on Brake discs and drums (170% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.64% fail on Brake discs (170% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.031% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.031% fail on Lever
    • 0.76% fail on Brake performance (81% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.27% fail on Rbt
          • 0.18% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.12% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.27% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.27% fail on Rbt (sp) (150% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on Rbt (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.21% fail on Parking brake performance (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.12% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.092% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.031% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.061% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.21% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.15% fail on Pedal (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.061% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.092% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.061% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.031% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.061% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.031% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.031% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 2.5% fail on Body, chassis, structure (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Transmission (20 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Drive shafts (21 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Joints (22 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.58% fail on Exhaust system (9 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Seats (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Passenger's seat (11 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Undertray (14 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.031% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.031% fail on Bracket
    • 0.031% fail on Body
      • 0.031% fail on Other body component
  • 0.52% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 0.43% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.27% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.12% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.12% fail on Emissions not tested (10 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.061% fail on Catalyst emissions
      • 0.15% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.12% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.031% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.031% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.061% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.061% fail on Engine oil leaks
    • 0.031% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.031% fail on Undertray
  • 0.27% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.15% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.12% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.092% fail on Condition
      • 0.031% fail on Requirements
  • 0.21% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.21% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.21% fail on Suspension (65% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.092% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.031% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.031% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.061% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.031% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.031% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 0.031% fail on Wheel bearings
  • 0.061% fail on Steering
    • 0.031% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.031% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.031% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.031% fail on Track rod end
  • 0.031% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.031% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages