Citroen C4 Cactus MOT Results

Registered in 2016

73.8% pass rate

from 3,476 tests in 2021

(66% worse than other 2016 cars)

Pass rate by mileage

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen C4 Cactus is unusually good or bad.

10% fail on Visibility (160% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 8.1% fail on Wipers (180% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Washers (130% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.086% fail on Condition of glass
  - 0.058% fail on Windscreen
  - 0.029% fail on Window
- 0.029% fail on View to rear
  - 0.029% fail on Mirrors
7.9% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (130% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Headlamps (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
  - 3.8% fail on Headlamp (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim (87% worse than other 2016 cars)
  - 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim (53% worse than other 2016 cars)
  - 0.60% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.95% fail on Stop lamp
- 0.32% fail on Direction indicators
  - 0.32% fail on Flashing type
    - 0.20% fail on Side repeaters
    - 0.12% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.086% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
  - 0.086% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 0.086% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 0.058% fail on Electrical equipment
  - 0.029% fail on Battery(ies)
  - 0.029% fail on Horn
- 0.029% fail on Position lamps
  - 0.029% fail on Position lamp
- 0.029% fail on Reversing lamps
  - 0.029% fail on Reversing lamps
4.6% fail on Tyres
- 2.8% fail on Tread depth (45% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Condition
- 0.086% fail on Size/type
4.3% fail on Body, chassis, structure (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Transmission (12 times worse than other 2016 cars)
  - 2.9% fail on Drive shafts (13 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    - 2.9% fail on Joints (13 times worse than other 2016 cars)
  - 0.058% fail on Belts (92 times worse than other 2016 cars)
  - 0.029% fail on Prop shafts
    - 0.029% fail on Joints
- 1.2% fail on Exhaust system (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Seats (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
  - 0.12% fail on Passenger's seat (11 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.058% fail on Fuel system
  - 0.029% fail on Tank
  - 0.029% fail on Pipe
- 0.029% fail on Bumpers
- 0.029% fail on Engine mounting
  - 0.029% fail on Engine mounting condition
- 0.029% fail on Undertray
3.0% fail on Brakes
- 2.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
  - 1.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
    - 1.4% fail on Brake pads
  - 0.95% fail on Brake discs and drums (99% worse than other 2016 cars)
    - 0.95% fail on Brake discs (99% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.98% fail on Brake performance
  - 0.55% fail on Service brake performance
    - 0.52% fail on Rbt
      - 0.43% fail on Service brake performance
      - 0.086% fail on Service brake imbalance
    - 0.029% fail on Plate brake tester
      - 0.029% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
  - 0.29% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
    - 0.29% fail on Rbt (sp)
  - 0.26% fail on Parking brake performance (170% worse than other 2016 cars)
    - 0.23% fail on Rbt
      - 0.23% fail on Parking brake performance (180% worse than other 2016 cars)
    - 0.029% fail on Plate brake tester
      - 0.029% fail on Parking brake performance
  - 0.12% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
    - 0.12% fail on Rbt (sp)
      - 0.086% fail on Service brake imbalance
      - 0.058% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.12% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
  - 0.086% fail on Electronic stability control
  - 0.058% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.086% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
  - 0.058% fail on Pedal
  - 0.029% fail on Hand lever
- 0.086% fail on Parking brake control
  - 0.086% fail on Lever
- 0.058% fail on Flexible brake hoses
- 0.029% fail on Rigid brake pipes
1.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 1.0% fail on Exhaust emissions
  - 0.69% fail on Compression ignition (100% worse than other 2016 cars)
    - 0.60% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (140% worse than other 2016 cars)
    - 0.058% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
    - 0.029% fail on Emission control equipment
      - 0.029% fail on Other emission control equipment
    - 0.029% fail on Emissions not tested
  - 0.35% fail on Spark ignition
    - 0.26% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    - 0.058% fail on Catalyst emissions
    - 0.029% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.14% fail on Fluid leaks (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
  - 0.12% fail on Engine oil leaks (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
  - 0.029% fail on Other leaks
- 0.029% fail on Noise suppression
  - 0.029% fail on Undertray
0.63% fail on Suspension (70% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Suspension arms
  - 0.29% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.12% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.12% fail on Anti-roll bars
  - 0.058% fail on Linkage ball joints
  - 0.058% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.058% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.058% fail on Springs (95% better than other 2016 cars)
  - 0.058% fail on Coil springs (95% better than other 2016 cars)
    - 0.058% fail on Coil spring (95% better than other 2016 cars)
0.43% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 0.29% fail on Seat belts
  - 0.26% fail on Condition
  - 0.029% fail on Attachment
- 0.14% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
0.14% fail on Identification of the vehicle
- 0.14% fail on Registration plates
0.14% fail on Road Wheels
- 0.12% fail on Attachment
- 0.029% fail on Condition
0.029% fail on Steering
- 0.029% fail on Steering linkage components
  - 0.029% fail on Track rod end